trahans99
Registered User
Why are all the teams signing there prospects right before the lockout? Whats the difference in signing them now rather than 6 months from now or next September? Wouldn't they rather save the $$$ now and pay later?
MePutPuckInNet said:it's my understanding that the june deadline will be out the window for any 2003 unsigned prospects....at least that's the BS i've been hearing. if that's the case, i think that would suck even more for the 2003 guys still unsigned. sounds like they're really gonna get screwed.....in more ways than one.
trahans99 said:Why are all the teams signing there prospects right before the lockout? Whats the difference in signing them now rather than 6 months from now or next September? Wouldn't they rather save the $$$ now and pay later?
uhhmm....are you sure about this? and what would work to a teams advantage? how?Schlep Rock said:If the kid plays in juniors they pay him nothing. If they are signing a prospect for the AHL, a top prospect would likely rather go back for a 20-year old junior season then sign an AHL deal (LIKELY).
Also, keep in mind... it doesn't make a difference signing them now or later in terms of contract value. If you're drafted prior to September 15, 2004, you are compensated in accordance with the old-CBA. It could work to teams advantage for later round draft picks who have blossomed and would be looking for maximum cash since the entry level system is likely to be overhauled capping top rookies and having the rest "fall in line".
MePutPuckInNet said:uhhmm....are you sure about this? and what would work to a teams advantage? how?
MePutPuckInNet said:unless I'm misreading this.... that doesn't sound accurate, according to Bob McKenzie: TSN am I missing something here?