Prospect Info: Prospect Rating #5

#5 Prospect

  • Clang

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Angello

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Almari

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reilly

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Drozg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Phillips

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Almeida

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Caulfield

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Zohorna

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lindgren

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Svejkovsky

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Miletic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Larmi

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Airola

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    53
  • Poll closed .

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,519
Now it gets to the stage where I either have to do a bit of research on these guys or just pick fairly randomly.

Probably a good chance to come to the same conclusion :laugh:
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,462
18,609
Should be Blomqvist pretty easy based off previous results. That said, he's a young 2nd round pick goalie. We have two goalies ready now.

I think Poulin, Legare, and POJ are clearly our top 3. OC, good at 4.

I think Maniscalco is #5, personally. Until we see what we have in him.
 

Randy Butternubs

Registered User
Mar 15, 2008
29,777
21,311
Morningside
Gruden for me. Blomqvist will have to show a bit more for me to consider him to be a prospective starting goalie.

May change to Maniscalco though.
 

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
8,287
8,799
I’ll prob vote Blomqvist and Clang back to back.

Even though some of the remaining skaters are okay, everyone left is mostly just org depth imo.
 

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
8,287
8,799
I would have Svejkovsky slightly above Gruden, albeit both lower down the list.

They’ve both played in a Swiss Army knife role at the junior level, however Svejkovsky has better tools imo.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,519
Probably go Gru, then Blu or Puu
 
Last edited:

LRS87

Registered User
Oct 7, 2020
639
572
What happened to Bellerive? Thought he was suppose to be pretty good.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
91,920
74,171
San Diego, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
What happened to Bellerive? Thought he was suppose to be pretty good.

images
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,462
18,609

Brutal. Just one more thing the Devil will covering in my "laughed at inappropriate moments" list on Day 1.

MOAR BJORK! Have you seen this guys physique?!?

-Billy G

I want him to tough and poke that physieque...not anything "feelings" related but I want to make sure those muscles are real and not a blow up suit. For how much the dude get hurt, I want to make sure he's not lying to us.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,393
25,264
Went with Blomqvist as I think we're all out of high certainty prospects.
 

FreeBobbyFarnham

Registered User
Jun 16, 2015
6,706
4,681
Montreal
Why him over Gruden? I almost went with Maniscalco this round.
Because I think his ceiling is much higher than Grudens. I can see him develop into a top 4 two-way defenseman if everything goes well. Also, consider he just had a tremendous season while playing behind Pasichnuk and still put up close to a ppg. Even Marino couldn't do that playing behind Fox. Now, I'm definitely not suggesting he's the next Marino, but it's definitely encouraging.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->