bluesfan94
Registered User
No. In that scenario, they would be tied on GD. The next tiebreaker is GF. Soton has 37 on the year, Swans have 27Soton concede 5 and Swans score 4, should do it no?
No. In that scenario, they would be tied on GD. The next tiebreaker is GF. Soton has 37 on the year, Swans have 27Soton concede 5 and Swans score 4, should do it no?
.....which is still better than getting relegated.Yeah I mentioned that...only for @Stray Wasp to tell us five years down the road how they spent all that money on awful buys with hiring Pardew as eventual manager after they fire Wagner because they're going to slip sometime in the next two seasons...
We're getting rid of our manager for a reason!
Never really celebrated getting rid of the manager as he went out not with a bang, but with a whimper. Go watch the tweet again, it's like they won a Cup. I have no problem cheering for a team who prevented from being relegated, but what they're doing is just pathetic.Lol how bitter can someone get. It's better to celebrate not getting relegated with a weak squad than celebrate getting rid of the manager.
Never really celebrated getting rid of the manager as he went out not with a bang, but with a whimper. Go watch the tweet again, it's like they won a Cup. I have no problem cheering for a team who prevented from being relegated, but what they're doing is just pathetic.
Huddersfield are none of these, only benefit for them in staying up is EPL's TV money.
Never really celebrated getting rid of the manager as he went out not with a bang, but with a whimper. Go watch the tweet again, it's like they won a Cup. I have no problem cheering for a team who prevented from being relegated, but what they're doing is just pathetic.
Prior to last year Huddersfield Town's best season finish in 45 years was 8th place in the 2nd tier. Anyone who's watched English football over the last 20-30 years would have deemed Huddersfield a mid-table 2nd tier team *at best*. That's their ceiling - or so one would have thought. Them being in the Premier League is an astonishing feat in its own right..staying in is no smaller miracle than Leicester winning the league.
You realize for a team that size the revenue they get by being in the PL could end up funding them for years right? This is enormous for them, everyone had them going down but somehow they survived.First off, I've never celebrated fourth place. Second off, anybody who celebrates fourth place is dumb. Third off, making 4th place gives you enormous revenue funds for making the Champion's League, especially when the likes of Spurs, Arsenal, and Liverpool tend to make it thru the round of 16 gaining thirty-million pounds worth of money.
Huddersfield are none of these, only benefit for them in staying up is EPL's TV money.
Which resume would be better?
3rd in PL
semis of FA Cup
quarters of Champions League
4th in PL
round of 32 of FA Cup
lose in finals of Champions League
Considering there is literally no difference between 3rd ard 4th in the PL this season and the FA Cup becoming more irrelevant annually, I'd definitely go with the deeper European run.Which resume would be better?
3rd in PL
semis of FA Cup
round of 16 of Champions League
4th in PL
round of 32 of FA Cup
lose in finals of Champions League
(edited)
If one of the criteria is going longer in the FA Cup, and we want to bring up how Liverpool would have done with Tottenham's draw in Europe, let's remind everyone of the teams Tottenham had to play in the FA Cup: Wimbledon, Newport County (forced replay), Rochdale (forced replay) & Swansea before losing to Man Utd.We only made the RO16, however it was a rather rough draw and it turned out to be an even pair of games. Not sure how Liverpool would have done with such a draw.
In the FA cup we struggled against minnows and Pochettino decided to throw away our largest chance of winning a trophy in a while..
If one of the criteria is going longer in the FA Cup, let's remind everyone of the teams Tottenham had to play in the FA Cup: Wimbledon, Newport County (forced replay), Rochdale (forced replay) & Swansea before losing to Man Utd.
Yes, that is what you said. Not what the initial theorist suggested. I quoted as such for organizational purposesThat's quite literally what I said. Their FA cup run was a tire-fire that shouldn't be a credit to the club.
Which resume would be better?
3rd in PL
semis of FA Cup
round of 16 of Champions League
4th in PL
round of 32 of FA Cup
lose in finals of Champions League
(edited)
I mean...making a final > losing in the Ro16. Especially considering Spurs bottled it pretty hard against Juventus, who they were superior to.There's no difference in prestige between 3rd and 4th in the league, so I would go with the CL final loss assuming they don't get embarrassed. If Liverpool lose in a historically large defeat or bottle it in a way that will be remembered for years (Gerrard slip) I would prefer Spurs season over that.
I don't know why this comparison is being made now though.
Fair enough. I think both sets of fans can be happy with their teams relative to previous years with this season. I also think expectations will be higher for both going into next season.It was 5:20am and I was bored.
Fair enough. I think both sets of fans can be happy with their teams relative to previous years with this season. I also think expectations will be higher for both going into next season.