Let's not pollute sport with politics.
Newcastle United were the most televised club outside the top six this season, and the second most the year before that. So they are a massive asset to the league and therefore deserve the right to crush smaller clubs like cockroaches.
I always thought human rights were overrated.
Who doesn't secretly want to grovel before a foreigner who owes their position to their parents rather than any talent of their own? Know your place, say I.
Anyway, isn't the most important human right the right of Europeans to be gratified in their overemotional response to a bunch of strangers kicking a ball around some grass? Football is life. You only have to listen to marketing campaigns to know this fundamental moral truth.
Everybody knows women drivers are a bit on the unreliable side. Isn't keeping them off the roads doing us all a favour?
If anyone mentions Newcastle being funded by lovely people you are racist, and probably enjoy committing sexual acts with fire hydrants.
Besides, who dares cast the first stone?
- what about those who profited from the breakup of Russia?
- what about Franco and his mates?
- what about Calciopoli?
- what about Agent Orange?
- what about the films of Michael Bay?
As you usual A1 post. But women can drive in the UAE. And Human Rights are only for the West(well that's if you go by the American foreign policy.) Just finished the vice. Only took me about 4 days a very entertaining film tbh. Same old **** though.
How many billionaire Arab sheikhs are there anyway?
The only correct answer here is too much.Oil and gas industry is approx. 2 trillion business (2 000 billion). So if let's say 60 % went into expenses, that would leave 800 billionaires annually. If half of them would be of the variety you mentioned, there would be 400...plenty enough for many more clubs. Globally, there are estimated to be over 2 000 billionaires.
A true legend on the pitch (also pictured: Zidane).
A true legend on the pitch (also pictured: Zidane).
That's an easy temptation for anyone. I imagine most Newcastle supporters would bristle at this link the way Stray Wasp seemingly has, similar to West Ham supporters when there was that rumor about Red Bull looking to get into England, though.I mean, Newcastle deserve much better. But I wonder if they couldn’t succeed with a group more like Liverpool’s group. They’re in it for profit, sure, but they attempt to be fair stewards at the same part. I figure their supporters would rather it (though the temptation to see all kinda money being tossed around after Ashley has to be strong).
At the end of the day it's a business. If it's a richer, better run business as long as they're still 'true to the roots' and try to connect with fans I don't see how that would be selling your soul.That's an easy temptation for anyone. I imagine most Newcastle supporters would bristle at this link the way Stray Wasp seemingly has, similar to West Ham supporters when there was that rumor about Red Bull looking to get into England, though.
If you sell your soul for trophies does it even matter?
I was waiting for this from you lol. I was even going to quote him telling him to be careful with that phrase around here.Sell your soul....
There is something to say about certain clubs ethos that wouldn't mesh with certain ownership groups. United would fit right in with a billionaire oil guy, where I don't think a club like Newcastle really do.
They have always had more money than pretty much everyone. They've basically spent like an oil club for years. They've over looked some pretty rotten owners. It would mean they're back to winning everything (or at least a chance at it).
I'm sure it's a bit easier for their club to stomach it.
Why, what's the connotation supposed to be?I was waiting for this from you lol. I was even going to quote him telling him to be careful with that phrase around here.