aingefan
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2008
- 4,610
- 2,506
Innings is a fair concern.Was reading a sportsnet article that they likely won’t call up Pearson to limit his innings but Zeuch and Kay are likely.
Makes sense.
Thanks.
Innings is a fair concern.Was reading a sportsnet article that they likely won’t call up Pearson to limit his innings but Zeuch and Kay are likely.
Pearson likely starts in Buffalo next season, but I wonder if he has a good spring, does he start with the big club?Innings is a fair concern.
Makes sense.
Thanks.
It’s a valid question.Pearson likely starts in Buffalo next season, but I wonder if he has a good spring, does he start with the big club?
Pearson likely starts in Buffalo next season, but I wonder if he has a good spring, does he start with the big club?
Pearson likely starts in Buffalo next season, but I wonder if he has a good spring, does he start with the big club?
Given he’s right around 100 innings so far this season and that’s likely his limit given the lack of pro innings prior he’s likely on a 150ish innings limit next year. So I would say no. I’m curious how they’re going to handle that so he’s not capped at the end of the year but whatever they do it’d likely be in Buffalo.
It will all depend on who is rule 5 eligible this winter I think. It would make sense to try some of those players.Listening to jays talk today on the radio Wilner was on. He brought up what I think was a good point. 40 man roster spots are very valuable in the off season and adding players to it now may not be a good idea. He said only players currently on the 40 man roster will be brought up when rosters expand. That he doesn’t think they will add anyone this year.
Listening to jays talk today on the radio Wilner was on. He brought up what I think was a good point. 40 man roster spots are very valuable in the off season and adding players to it now may not be a good idea. He said only players currently on the 40 man roster will be brought up when rosters expand. That he doesn’t think they will add anyone this year.
The list is a couple years out of date, but bluebird banter did put up a Rule 5 eligibility table in 2017 that forecast all the way through this coming winter.
The notable(ish) names on that list who would need to be protected from selection (1st time eligibility only)
-Riley Adams
-Max Castillo
-Otto Lopez
-Brock Lundquist
-Gabe Moreno
-Kevin Smith
-Samad Taylor
-Logan Warmoth
-Chavez Young
Rule 5-Eligible Players
This isn't the list for the upcoming one but the one after that. The rule 5 happens before the calender changes to 2020 so you need to look at the 2019 list. Not much worth anything on the 2019 list.
T.J. Zeuch
Zach Jackson
Josh Palacios
and I believe Kay via trade. Not sure if anyone else we've acquired would be worth it. Jackson and Palacios both aren't really worth it anyway.
Jeebus......The list is a couple years out of date, but bluebird banter did put up a Rule 5 eligibility table in 2017 that forecast all the way through this coming winter.
The notable(ish) names on that list who would need to be protected from selection (1st time eligibility only)
-Riley Adams
-Max Castillo
-Otto Lopez
-Brock Lundquist
-Gabe Moreno
-Kevin Smith
-Samad Taylor
-Logan Warmoth
-Chavez Young
Rule 5-Eligible Players
Jeebus......
This isn't the list for the upcoming one but the one after that. The rule 5 happens before the calender changes to 2020 so you need to look at the 2019 list. Not much worth anything on the 2019 list.
T.J. Zeuch
Zach Jackson
Josh Palacios
and I believe Kay via trade. Not sure if anyone else we've acquired would be worth it. Jackson and Palacios both aren't really worth it anyway.
This isn't the list for the upcoming one but the one after that. The rule 5 happens before the calender changes to 2020 so you need to look at the 2019 list. Not much worth anything on the 2019 list.
T.J. Zeuch
Zach Jackson
Josh Palacios
and I believe Kay via trade. Not sure if anyone else we've acquired would be worth it. Jackson and Palacios both aren't really worth it anyway.
Take it for a grain of salt, but someone who has been right before on some Jays news named Orlando Barrios and Easton McGee as the pieces from the Rays for Sogard.
The thing with pitchers is that you want to use their bullets while you can. As soon as Pearson is ready, I imagine he'll be up. If that means treating him like Paddack on San Diego and skipping a start here and there while managing his pitch count, then they'll do that. Pitchers are so unpredictable health-wise, especially guys that throw as hard as Pearson. You might gain an extra year of control in the process of keeping him down an extra six months, but then lose him to TJ anyway. Might as well just bring him up when he's ready.
I didn't say he was starting the year with the big club, I said if he's ready he'll likely be with the team. And you can't "prevent" TJ...you just have to hope it doesn't happen. It's just as likely to happen next year as it is those other years. Which is why the Vlad, Eloy treatment doesn't really happen with pitchers.Huh? The Jay's aren't contending with or without Pearson starting the year with the big club. They will definitely want to protect that extra controllable year.
Besides Pearson hasn't pitched much at the triple A level so he can still learn at that level and he needs to have his innings monitored so they can prevent something like Tommy John surgery or any least delay it so they can get some years before it happens when they need him when they're potential playoff team in 2021 or 2022.