Line Combos: Playoffs and the Healthy Roster

Discussion in 'Ottawa Senators' started by Day Man, Apr 7, 2017.

  1. Micklebot Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    32,687
    Likes Received:
    9,497
    Trophy Points:
    187
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Both guys have 3 pts in their last 20 games, but one has been stuck with Kelly while the other has played with Turris.

    I think Dzingel has a good future ahead of him, but he's ice cold.
     
  2. Adele Dazeem Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    2,319
    Likes Received:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    79
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Occupation:
    Stocks and Stuff
    Location:
    On an island
    Wingels has been a solid bottom-6er; I'd much rather drop Burrows but that likely won't happen as he was brought in....
     
  3. KeonHorton Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    9,902
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    So, from the perspective of injured players' status, Ryan and Smith will play, but Method will not?

    Is this an accurate summary?
     
  4. GWNR Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,747
    Likes Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    94
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    You wanna drop a guy known for being clutch in the post season? The guy who scored the playoff clinching goal?

    Good idea!!!
     
  5. HzH Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2015
    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    5,072
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    We dominate the game until an entirely predictable Boro turnover which directly ends up in our net.

    Anyone going to defend him?

    I hope that experiment is over and we go back to dressing 6 nhl D.
     
  6. aragorn #Boucherout

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    20,642
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    Trophy Points:
    231
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Yea me, this is just more ******** & blaming everything that goes wrong with this team on Boro. He played it off the glass which happens a hundred times a game & it got knocked down & ended up on the Bruins stick. That far away from the net near the blueline where were the forwards to support & get that guy? They were no where to be found & allowed him to walk in & shoot & shouldn't Anderson have stopped that, it didn't look like that tough a shot?

    IMO it was more on Anderson who had no shots on net in the second & should have been fresh for the 3rd. It's not one guy's fault but a number of guys made errors & it cost the team which adds to the choker reputation this team has in the playoffs.
     
  7. HzH Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2015
    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    5,072
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    THATS THE PROBLEM.

    The only play Boro makes is to play it off the glass because he sucks at hockey. And this time there was ****ing a logjam of player waiting for the puck by the glass and Boro still can't make the read.

    We looked like world beaters until boro assisted on the game tying goal.
     
  8. Sir Karlsson Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2017
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000

    How is having no shots in the second period a positive for a goalie going into the third? Its usually easier to feel the puck consistently each period to stay sharp.

    I thought Boro played well overall this game, one of the best games I've seen him play in a while. At the end of the day he still took a dumb penalty and was the major contributor to the goal that proved to be the turning point of the game.

    That shot is going in more than 50% of the time on goalies not named Price. Sure he could have made a HUGE save but it was a bad clear that lost us this game.

    Forwards and GB are to blame for not adjusting in the 3rd when things were obviously trending the wrong way... but no way Boro should be in the lineup game 2 given we obviously need to improve our puck moving in the back end. If we don't have EK at 100% we need to compensate with better transition D than boro who can play 18 minutes
     
  9. DJB #MELNYKOUT

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,811
    Likes Received:
    4,306
    Trophy Points:
    235
    SB Cash:
    $ 304,325
    Hoffman needs to be taken off that checking line. He isnt getting scoring chances when he is defending all game
     
  10. 18Hossa And Grace, Too

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    244
    Trophy Points:
    82
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Boucher ****ed with a seemingly optimal lineup then hard matched our worst defensive unit against the Bruins only good line.
    Boro isn't 100% at fault for the first goal either though, he couldve played it better but not solely his fault. Pretty sure Macarthur had a horrendous clearing attempt as well. Didn't help that Anderson fumbled the shot before instead of holding it for the whistle.
     
  11. Sensinitis Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    13,189
    Likes Received:
    1,856
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Gender:
    Male
    MacArthur-Brassard-Ryan
    Hoffman-Turris-Stone
    Dzingel-Pageau-Pyatt
    Stalberg-Smith-Burrows

    Hopefully Methot slots in also.
     
  12. ReginKarlssonLehner Let's Win It All

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    33,701
    Likes Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    186
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Hoffman-Pageau-Stone
    MacArthur-Brassard-Ryan
    Smith-Turris-Burrows
    Stalberg-Wingels-Pyatt
     
  13. DrEasy Out rumptackling

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    7,017
    Likes Received:
    1,768
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    I agree with the first line. Switch Brassard and Turris. Reunite the MoToR line, and try to get the Brassard + Burrows (the "playoff performers") chemistry going again. Add Stalberg, maybe his excellence will rub off on his team mates.

    Hoffman-Pageau-Stone
    MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
    Stalberg-Brassard-Burrows
    Wingels-Smith-Pyatt
     
  14. GWNR Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    2,747
    Likes Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    94
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    This is what I would do.

    You need to get Hoff and Stone to work off one another. Pageau may be the best catalyst to do that.
     
  15. SensFactor Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    1,504
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Location:
    Ottawa
    With Methot back I'd do this:

    Karlsson Methot
    Phaneuf Claesson
    Wideman Ceci

    Boro should sit and that Phaneuf Ceci pairing needs to be broken up.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2017
  16. Real Smart Sens Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2014
    Messages:
    4,760
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    36
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Boro had one or two bad shifts - actually, he really just failed to clear a hectic zone one time - but beyond that he was excellent in his role. Super physical, kept it simple, moved the puck quickly and efficiently. No way he comes out. It will be Claesson. I wish it could be Wideman, but I can't see them rolling only 2RD. Claesson didn't handle the puck well IMO and was a big part of the problem in turning the puck over too much. I like Claesson a lot and think he's been way better throughout the year, but Boro was better last night. It's possible Claesson has been playing "playoff" hockey since he came up to the bigs, whereas Boro saved his best for the playoffs, because there was certainly a shift last night.


    Re: Phaneuf and Ceci, I thought they were pretty damn solid on the PK. We were shorthanded for 5:19 in total last night, giving up 3 shot and 0 goals. Ceci and Phaneuf were on for 4:48 and 4:17 of that, respectively.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2017
  17. Answer Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    4,475
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    124
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Location:
    Edmonton

    Methot - Karlsson
    Harpur - Claesson
    Phaneuf - Ceci
     
  18. Sens of Anarchy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    39,737
    Likes Received:
    18,699
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    I would seriously consider moving Methot with Ceci and playing P9 w EK.

    Methot can move better than P9 and that could get us out of trouble.
     
  19. topshelf15 Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    23,249
    Likes Received:
    3,502
    Trophy Points:
    186
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Saftey is death ,is something Boucher needs to remember.Now isnt the time to be scared to take a chance,put both Dizngle and White in the lineup,up front.Pull Boro and put in Harpur ,and lets score some damn goals and make Boson defend :nod:
     
  20. Sens of Anarchy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    39,737
    Likes Received:
    18,699
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Hoffman - Pageau - Stone
    Mac - Brass- Ryan
    Smith - Turris - Burrows
    Slalberg - Wingels - Pyatt

    Don't use a specific shut down line to match up.. All these lines can play two-way hockey and defend when needed
     
  21. Wallet Inspector Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    1,170
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Stack the top 2 lines:

    Hoffman-Turris-Stone
    Macarthur-Brassard-Ryan
    Dzingel-Pageau-Burrows
    Stalberg-Smith-Pyatt
     
  22. Tkachuk27 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    71
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    MacArthur Turris Ryan
    Smith Pageau Pyatt
    Hoffman Brass Stone
    Dzingel White Burrows

    Claesson Karlsson
    Meth Ceci
    Phanuef Wideman

    Adding Dzingel & White means more skilled options and more speed vs a short handed Boston D

    Also really don't see the point in playing Borowiecki he has a really low hockey IQ

    Match up game Smith Pageau Pyatt vs Marchand Bergeron Backes
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2017
  23. Sens of Anarchy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    39,737
    Likes Received:
    18,699
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
  24. Answer Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    4,475
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    124
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Whats the point of having MacArthur back when that will take out Dzingle out of the lineup. Dzingle has speed, handles the puck, back checks, make plays. We need that in the bottom six.

    Our coach won't let White play because he is a rookie and can't handle playoff pressure on 4th line? While, MacVoy led all skaters in Ice-team playing top paring minutes on defense.

    Stack top 2 lines and fill the rest with best possible remaining players

    Hoffman - Turris - Stone
    MacArthur - Brassard - Ryan
    Dzingle - Pageau - Smith
    Stalberg - White - Burrows

    Pyatt
    Wingels

    Too much grit and not much scoring..
     
  25. Sens of Anarchy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    39,737
    Likes Received:
    18,699
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 300,000
    As much as we'd like to see White and see him do well, if Boucher doesn't trust him he will go down to 11 forwards , mixing and matching and White will sit for large portions
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"