Speculation: Playoff positioning

mooncalf

Registered User
Mar 15, 2017
1,493
1,182
San Jose
I was curious how the sharks did down the stretch of the Stanley Cup Finals year, and I noticed they lost three in a row at home in regulation, games 73-75 of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoloTonyBrownTown

stator

Registered User
Apr 17, 2012
5,021
1,010
San Jose
I was curious how the sharks did down the stretch of the Stanley Cup Finals year, and I noticed they lost three in a row at home in regulation, games 73-75 of the season.

Yes, but Jones finished that season with a .918 SV% which that is likely impossible for him now with these few games left.
 

Jaleel619

Registered User
Nov 16, 2016
1,217
432
SJ
I think we can beat Beat Vegas. W Karlssons only got 40 points on the 1st line, the only ones to lock down are Stone and Alex Tuch(of course marchesualt). I think if Sharks stay healthy and everybody is prepared we'd be probably have a better time solidifying 2nd seed and preparing for them because our players are better top to bottom. I also think whoever takes the 4th WC could give the flames a good reckoning.

If they survive the 2nd round they'll probably be more knocked up than us since Vegas didn't seem as physical as previously thought.
 

Crewouse

Registered User
Mar 30, 2016
76
75
Those look pretty cool but I can't see myself buying Sharks playoff gear till they finally win one. I don't know why.

Ya I wouldn't, kind of feels like clinging onto the smallest of victories. Like Preds raising that regular season western champions banner, ish
 

Naki

Registered User
Oct 8, 2009
4,560
899
We now shift from "can they win the division?" To "can they keep home ice in the first round?"
 

Negatively Positive

Mr. Longevity
Mar 2, 2011
10,298
2,202
The division race is over. Deboer has less than 3 weeks to figure out how to beat Vegas 4 out of 7 times. Imagine losing to Vegas in 6 last year then adding Erik freaking Karlsson and losing to them in 4 or 5.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,349
13,737
Folsom
The division race is over. Deboer has less than 3 weeks to figure out how to beat Vegas 4 out of 7 times. Imagine losing to Vegas in 6 last year then adding Erik freaking Karlsson and losing to them in 4 or 5.

Imagine a coach that has a need to ice a completely useless player because of how the boys like him rather than how he performs and also still icing said player even when he and the team got punked because of said player. I'd can DeBoer if he loses to Vegas but I know the team won't since they just extended this past off-season.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,801
10,392
San Jose
Imagine a coach that has a need to ice a completely useless player because of how the boys like him rather than how he performs and also still icing said player even when he and the team got punked because of said player. I'd can DeBoer if he loses to Vegas but I know the team won't since they just extended this past off-season.
I don’t think Deboer is safe if that happens. This season hasn’t gone well for him, and much like McLellan they’re succeeding in spite of him. Karlsson turning into hot fire essentially saved his job. That hot streak doesn’t happen and I feel fairly confident he would have been gone already.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,349
13,737
Folsom
I don’t think Deboer is safe if that happens. This season hasn’t gone well for him, and much like McLellan they’re succeeding in spite of him. Karlsson turning into hot fire essentially saved his job. That hot streak doesn’t happen and I feel fairly confident he would have been gone already.

I wish I had your confidence on this. The way they handled McLellan is the reason why I can't see them canning DeBoer anytime soon. This organization does not seem to care for paying people to not be there from a coaching perspective.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,801
10,392
San Jose
I wish I had your confidence on this. The way they handled McLellan is the reason why I can't see them canning DeBoer anytime soon. This organization does not seem to care for paying people to not be there from a coaching perspective.
That’s a fair point. I just think that Doug took a big risk trying to go all in this season, and Deboer has the team underperforming. I think that Doug didn’t want to have to make that call which is why they had that meeting. If they hadn’t turned it around, I really do think Deboer would have been canned. I mean, he rearranged his coaching staff. That seems like a desperation move by a coach when he knows that his job hangs in the balance.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,349
13,737
Folsom
That’s a fair point. I just think that Doug took a big risk trying to go all in this season, and Deboer has the team underperforming. I think that Doug didn’t want to have to make that call which is why they had that meeting. If they hadn’t turned it around, I really do think Deboer would have been canned. I mean, he rearranged his coaching staff. That seems like a desperation move by a coach when he knows that his job hangs in the balance.

I agree but the fact that he got that opportunity to run with a rearranged staff is in itself a signal of how averse they are to making the coaching change. You don't see stuff like that very often in this league.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,801
10,392
San Jose
I agree but the fact that he got that opportunity to run with a rearranged staff is in itself a signal of how averse they are to making the coaching change. You don't see stuff like that very often in this league.
Doug definitely doesn’t like to make coaching changes. He held on to McLellan for 3 years too long. I feel like Deboer has worn out his welcome at this point, but I’m hoping Doug doesn’t waste another year holding on to him.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,349
13,737
Folsom
Doug definitely doesn’t like to make coaching changes. He held on to McLellan for 3 years too long. I feel like Deboer has worn out his welcome at this point, but I’m hoping Doug doesn’t waste another year holding on to him.

I assume some of that depends on where EK65 is at with a new contract. If he walks, their only legitimate free agent option to try and make up for that is Matt Duchene and moving Cooch to wing then try to find another offensive top four level guy on defense.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,801
10,392
San Jose
I assume some of that depends on where EK65 is at with a new contract. If he walks, their only legitimate free agent option to try and make up for that is Matt Duchene and moving Cooch to wing then try to find another offensive top four level guy on defense.
Duchene or Panarin. I think if Karlsson walks Doug will go hard after one of those 2.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Duchene or Panarin. I think if Karlsson walks Doug will go hard after one of those 2.

If he strikes out on Erik Karlsson and those two, I suspect he’ll make a hard push for Taylor Hall.

Hall-Hertl-Meier would be a force to be reckoned with.

The division race is over. Deboer has less than 3 weeks to figure out how to beat Vegas 4 out of 7 times. Imagine losing to Vegas in 6 last year then adding Erik freaking Karlsson and losing to them in 4 or 5.

Kind of like Toronto losing to Boston in 7, adding John Tavares, and then losing in 4 or 5 lol.

I don’t think Deboer is safe if that happens. This season hasn’t gone well for him, and much like McLellan they’re succeeding in spite of him. Karlsson turning into hot fire essentially saved his job. That hot streak doesn’t happen and I feel fairly confident he would have been gone already.

Yeah, I wish I shared your optimism as well but I don’t. Who signs a coach to an extension and then fires him before it even starts? Has that ever happened before?
 

Fistfullofbeer

Moderator
May 9, 2011
30,277
8,970
Whidbey Island, WA
I'd go for both to be honest in such a scenario. They need a legit top six center that'll permanently push Cooch to wing. He's done as a center.
I know Cooch has been terrible at C but do we have any idea why? Is is basically his ability in face-offs? He was never really a play-making C or overly physical to begin with.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad