Alwalys
Phu m.
- May 19, 2010
- 25,894
- 6,140
i'm not sure what you think this proves. think about it.And those teams did worse than the Sharks too.
i'm not sure what you think this proves. think about it.And those teams did worse than the Sharks too.
Screw that. Waive Dell, tell Jones in no uncertain terms he IS the backup until his contract runs out and bring up anyone else. Really, anyone. This team is going nowhere but slowly down hill. If the call up isn't very good, no great loss. But maybe they'll find someone so energized by the opportunity they've been given the'll be dynamite.That sounds about right to me... best series was with Colorado. Best and worst game was the Las Vegas series. Colorado has minimum scoring threats. So Jones did not have a constant, come at him opponent. Oddly, neither does StL, but not to the extend of Colorado.
I thought the best team the Sharks faced in this playoffs was Las Vegas.
I have doubts going this direction. Looking at the past, Jones has done his best work when he had a legitimate backup goaltender that can take over his job. That was Reimer. Apparently, Jones needs incentive to keep his performance up.
i'm not sure what you think this proves. think about it.
The sharks almost made the SCF with that style. So ... no?I don't think it proves what you think it does. Even if they're worse defensive teams, the Sharks are comparable in what they give up. It's not a formula for success to give up that many opportunities of that type.
We literally did better this year than the last two. I dont understand comments like this.This team is going nowhere but slowly down hill.
The sharks almost made the SCF with that style. So ... no?
There was a shift after game 4 of the Vegas series but by Colorado it was back to what it was. In the end the results were very similar to the regular season. The issue was that our chances going back the other way weren't nearly good enough and a lot of that is on an ineffective Karlsson.The style they had in the regular season and the playoffs were much much different.
Sorry i will rephrase this. The style they had after game 4 of the playoffs was much much different.
The sharks almost made the SCF with that style. So ... no?
I'd say health was the primary reason, but Jones was another big reason, and, as the data show, other goalies fared better even with similarly or more suspect defenses.And it cost them the Cup because it was that style that forced them to go 7 with Vegas and to a lesser extent with Colorado and killed them against St. Louis so yes. Just because they almost made it to the Finals in spite of it doesn't mean it was good for them. It wasn't. This isn't that hard to understand.
I'd say health was the primary reason, but Jones was another big reason, and, as the data show, other goalies fared better even with similarly or more suspect defenses.
When it comes down to it we are in no way the worst defense in the league even with our high risk system, there are actually defenses with poor talent that get beat on every night. Yet the goalies do better. So Jones doesn't get a pass in any way for his performance this year.
Martin Jones will be our starting goaltender in the 2019-2020 season. FULL STOP. You know it's true, stop thinking they won't come out with some statement about "believing in him" blah blah blah... (Translation: He's under a pretty immovable contract and his trade value is as low as could be.)
/thread
I'd say health was the primary reason, but Jones was another big reason, and, as the data show, other goalies fared better even with similarly or more suspect defenses.
lol.... translated "I mean he looks like a goalie, he has pads and stuff but he doesnt do his job"From the Athletic (paywall) article "2019-20 Goalie Tiers: Anonymous panel of GMs and coaches rates all 31 starting goalies".
Ranked #23, Tier 3 of 4. Sample anonymous coach's opinion: "He’s had good moments. But he just didn’t stop pucks. I like the way he looks but he just doesn’t stop pucks.” Sounds about right.
I think trading away Bibeau clears the way for more starts for Shortridge and Korenar and it will be interesting to see who wins the AHL starter job. I like Shortridge's size and resume. How did these two compare in Camp and pre-season games?Yeah, Jones was bad last year but I want to see him in 10 - 20 games before I'm ready to cash in. Dell on the other hand gets a super short leash. Mainly because he should be better and more consistent as his history would indicate. This new Dell needs to come around or GTFO.
The real question is about Shortridge, Bibeau, Korenar; are any of them back up material, or are they all earmarked for starter positions?