Why on earth would Vegas elect to give a 2 year contract to Karlsson? They give him a 1 year contract, and spend until January talking to his agent about what acceptable terms are for a contract, while getting a chance to see if last year was a fluke. And if they can't reach favourable terms, then they repeat thie arbitrationpprocess next year and sign him to a 2 year contract, taking away one of his UFA years.
I just don't understand all the people who believe that teams want aby promising players to obtain UFA status... As RFAs, they can only be given a 1-2 year contract in arbitration - that's next to no leverage to get a bigger or longer contract.
If the team allows a player to become a UFA, suddenly the player can rebuke with, well Team XY offered me 13x7, match it or I walk... There's absolutely no benefit to allowing a player that you want to keep to become a UFA. The players if they're lucky become subjects of a bidding war and chose where they want to go.
Should a RFA not take the offered contract all they can do is not play hockey. They can't go play elsewhere. They lose money, development time, the option to play high level hockey - which if you play in the NHL you're absolutely passionate about (at least at the age you're an RFA at).
aint that the truth uncle benBig day today for Trouba!
I still think Trouba's motive is take the likely 1 year and force them to deal him next summer as he only has 2 years until UFA. He apparently pulled his trade reqeust but I believe he still wants to go to an American team. He is a huge part of the Jets blueline but still gets 0 PP time as he is behind Buff, Morrissey, Laine on the point and Myers when it comes to coaches PP usage. That has to upset him a bit as well IMO
Keep in mind those dollar values are what each side is proposing for 1 RFA year. Consider:Jets, Trouba $3 million apart: Arbitration filings are in with Friday’s hearing approaching
"According to a source, the Jets are offering $4 million, while the Trouba camp is countering by asking for $7 million."
if they Really offered 4M/yr that's an insulting offer... yes I do understand it's a negotiating tactic, but lowballing a player doesn't do you any favors
Jets, Trouba $3 million apart: Arbitration filings are in with Friday’s hearing approaching
"According to a source, the Jets are offering $4 million, while the Trouba camp is countering by asking for $7 million."
if they Really offered 4M/yr that's an insulting offer... yes I do understand it's a negotiating tactic, but lowballing a player doesn't do you any favors
The arbitrator has 48 hours before handing down his ruling. Until then the team & player can continue to negotiate in hopes of reaching a settlement.I confess I usually am not that interested in arbitration, but with a number of recognizable names among the defensemen going to arbitration (Trouba, Dumba, Ceci, Montour, Edmundson for example), and that Edmonton is negotiating with Nurse and both sides are probably watching the outcome of these hearings with interest, I find myself paying more attention this year, but I do not know the process. Trouba for example has his hearing today, so I assume at some point negotiations cease and they are locked into the arbitration process, but how long before we hear any decisions? (I assume that many of those scheduled for arbitration will be settled before the hearing date, as many already have been).
there's going low and lowballing someone... and there's also RFA negotiations and presenting an arbitration hearing... both completely 2 different thingsAs a Sens fan, you should know as well as anyone that going low in arbitration can be the best move.
there's going low and lowballing someone... and there's also RFA negotiations and presenting an arbitration hearing... both completely 2 different things
Jets, Trouba $3 million apart: Arbitration filings are in with Friday’s hearing approaching
"According to a source, the Jets are offering $4 million, while the Trouba camp is countering by asking for $7 million."
if they Really offered 4M/yr that's an insulting offer... yes I do understand it's a negotiating tactic, but lowballing a player doesn't do you any favors
Is there a hard limit on the 48hrs after the meeting?
Is it 48hrs exactly from the time the meeting ends or is it a soft limit and just more like 48hours -ish.
Very curious to see what happens with Trouba.
According to local media out here & what I've read on a few sports sites the word will come down & be announced this afternoon. Hockey signings don't punch a timeclock. I think it was the Dumba deal that happened late into the night. So a Sunday announcement would be the norm.im not sure if they announce things on sundays
Is there a hard limit on the 48hrs after the meeting?
Is it 48hrs exactly from the time the meeting ends or is it a soft limit and just more like 48hours -ish.
Very curious to see what happens with Trouba.
im not sure if they announce things on sundays
Thank you.It's a soft limit. There have been cases in the past where the arbitrator took 3-4 days, usually due to other commitments.
It’s the process. If they did it like mlb the arbitrator picks one of the numbers presented.It’s not an offer to Trouba. It’s an estimate of value to the arbitrator. Just like Trouba’s estimate of himself was $7 million to the arbitrator. Few people would agree that Troubas value is either of those.
I’m sure the Jets offered multiple contracts to Trouba that are more than $4 million. My hunch is $5.5 - $6 million per year. He either wants more money or he wants out.