GWT: PL FINALE - Matchweek 38

hatterson

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
35,197
12,489
North Tonawanda, NY
It also ignores the fact that games would play out differently if long shots were worth more. Not just in terms of shot selection, but also in terms of teams pressing for equalizers or winners when they're suddenly tied or down instead of being ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stray Wasp

Corto

Faceless Man
Sep 28, 2005
15,993
943
Braavos
Is Man City the best team of the PL era?

You mean as in this one season or on the whole?

I'd say no to both.

Wenger's Arsenal probably peaked the highest, and Fergie's ManU was a dynasty of which City can still only dream of - including results in Europe.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
You mean as in this one season or on the whole?

I'd say no to both.

Wenger's Arsenal probably peaked the highest, and Fergie's ManU was a dynasty of which City can still only dream of - including results in Europe.

I can't see any argument for another PL team to have peaked higher than this City.
 

Corto

Faceless Man
Sep 28, 2005
15,993
943
Braavos
I can't see any argument for another PL team to have peaked higher than this City.

I dunno, Arsenal was fantastic. Did just as well in the league, never losing a game, and the competition wasn't exactly awful either - Fergie's ManU, Abramovich's Chelsea (though still early days), Liverpool (who'd go on to win the CL next season), Shearer's Newcastle...

In many ways, seeing how City and Liverpool (and even Spurs) bolted ahead of the struggling Utd/Arsenal/Chelsea, I think Arsenal had bigger competition in 03-04 when it comes to harder games (though obviously noone stayed at their heels like Liverpool and City this season).

Lauren, Campbell, Toure, Cole, Vieira, Ljundberg, Pires, Bergkamp, Henry, etc....

It was a phenomenal team. I don't know that I'd put Pep's City above Wenger's peak Arsenal.

(this is just an opinion, obviously, no real way to compare the two, but all I'm saying is that there is definitely room for debate IMO)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Il Mediano

hatterson

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
35,197
12,489
North Tonawanda, NY
I dunno, Arsenal was fantastic. Did just as well in the league, never losing a game, and the competition wasn't exactly awful either - Fergie's ManU, Abramovich's Chelsea (though still early days), Liverpool (who'd go on to win the CL next season), Shearer's Newcastle...

In many ways, seeing how City and Liverpool (and even Spurs) bolted ahead of the struggling Utd/Arsenal/Chelsea, I think Arsenal had bigger competition in 03-04 when it comes to harder games (though obviously noone stayed at their heels like Liverpool and City this season).

Lauren, Campbell, Toure, Cole, Vieira, Ljundberg, Pires, Bergkamp, Henry, etc....

It was a phenomenal team. I don't know that I'd put Pep's City above Wenger's peak Arsenal.

(this is just an opinion, obviously, no real way to compare the two, but all I'm saying is that there is definitely room for debate IMO)

I think the City of the last 2 years is a clear step ahead of any other English team in terms of domestic dominance.

198 points and 5 trophies in 2 years is absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YNWA14

East Coast Bias

Registered User
Feb 28, 2014
8,362
6,422
NYC
I have no problem with people saying City's run is the best PL team. I'm not sure I agree, but I understand.

I just find it really hard to compare teams from different decades.

Recently watched the United 2008 CL run. They finished 2 pts above Chelsea in the league, and beat them in the CL.

Both of those teams were insanely good.

Van der Sar, Brown/Vidic/Rio/Evra, Carrick/Scholes/Giggs, Ronaldo/Rooney/Tevez. Hargreaves and Park super subs.

Cech, Essien/Carvhalho/Terry/Cole, Lampard/Ballack/Markele, Joe Cole/Drogba/Malouda.

Arsenal was good that year. Liverpool was real good - had the Xavi/Gerrard/Mascherano MF with Torres scoring 30+.

So while the numbers City put up are insane, I still look back and don't see them as better than this. Maybe it's nostalgia.
 

Il Mediano

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
1,837
690
Yeah, I've said here a couple of times, but I find it very difficult to judge (or crown) this City side when the top 6 is in the state it is.

One could argue 3 of 6 should be, or are about to be, in rebuild mode. And anyone who knows me knows I love me some Spurs, but they spent 0$ in the transfer market and moved to a new stadium mid-season. That squad was spread pretty thin this season, let's be real.

You could even extend this discussion outside of England and look at Europe's traditional elite clubs. Which of them are playing at a level you'd consider exceptional, or even close to their peak? Barca fans want Valverde gone, Kovac's Bayern isn't exactly super, Madrid is a mess, Ronaldo didn't really raise Juve's level that much and Allegri's out; Inter and AC are nothing like they used to be. I mean honestly, which club? Even clubs like PSG and Atletico aren't at a level you'd consider their highest in recent memory and look to be going through a transition stage.

Basically, our only way to really judge City is Liverpool. And the Liverpool side that completely smacked City in the CL (the healthy De Bruyne, 100 point City I might add), is the exact same Liverpool Roma played.

And sure, Liverpool were really good, at times exceptional even; they clearly deserved to go through and I'd never suggest otherwise, but after we made some adjustments I thought we at least caused them a few issues. Maybe the Liverpool fans here view that tie differently, but I think I'm being pretty reasonable.

But despite them being the superior side, at no point did I feel Roma were playing some slayer of all-time greatness. I mean, if that Liverpool side Roma played was truly the team that not only beat, but smoked, the greatest team in Premier League history 5-1... then I dunno what to tell ya.

And look, I know the CL isn't always the greatest indicator of quality. Weird things can happen, and upsets exist, but I think for the most part, if you know what you're looking at it, you can generally get a good idea of how good a team is over 180 minutes despite the result. And in cases when it's two teams so familiar with each other, from the same damn league, I think it becomes a little more valid. Why did the greatest team ever from England get smoked by another team.... from England? Someone, please explain that to me. And please don't tell me that Liverpool is the 2nd greatest team ever from England, because at that point, we're handing out greatness cards like Oprah. If you want to say this season's edition has a claim, fine, I'd probably disagree, but it's more valid than 2017-18's edition.

Furthermore, I could easily make the argument our 2006-08 team was just as good, if not better than our 2017-18 side. And when we played United in the CL, they murdered us. That time, I actually came away from the tie thinking we were miles apart. There was no adjusting or clawing back, no glimmer of hope ...nothing.

And of course, I'm well aware how I view the game is just as flawed and biased as anyone else. Maybe the sample size is too small, or maybe I'm forgetting things, or maybe I'm just completely wrong - I dunno.

What I do know is, is that I'd really like to stop seeing City get knocked out of the CL by clubs from England. Not a great look for supposedly the country's greatest ever side. You should probably avoid doing that, one would think.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,096
25,204
Yeah, I've said here a couple of times, but I find it very difficult to judge (or crown) this City side when the top 6 is in the state it is.

One could argue 3 of 6 should be, or are about to be, in rebuild mode. And anyone who knows me knows I love me some Spurs, but they spent 0$ in the transfer market and moved to a new stadium mid-season. That squad was spread pretty thin this season, let's be real.

You could even extend this discussion outside of England and look at Europe's traditional elite clubs. Which of them are playing at a level you'd consider exceptional, or even close to their peak? Barca fans want Valverde gone, Kovac's Bayern isn't exactly super, Madrid is a mess, Ronaldo didn't really raise Juve's level that much and Allegri's out; Inter and AC are nothing like they used to be. I mean honestly, which club? Even clubs like PSG and Atletico aren't at a level you'd consider their highest in recent memory and look to be going through a transition stage.

Basically, our only way to really judge City is Liverpool. And the Liverpool side that completely smacked City in the CL (the healthy De Bruyne, 100 point City I might add), is the exact same Liverpool Roma played.

And sure, Liverpool were really good, at times exceptional even; they clearly deserved to go through and I'd never suggest otherwise, but after we made some adjustments I thought we at least caused them a few issues. Maybe the Liverpool fans here view that tie differently, but I think I'm being pretty reasonable.

But despite them being the superior side, at no point did I feel Roma were playing some slayer of all-time greatness. I mean, if that Liverpool side Roma played was truly the team that not only beat, but smoked, the greatest team in Premier League history 5-1... then I dunno what to tell ya.

And look, I know the CL isn't always the greatest indicator of quality. Weird things can happen, and upsets exist, but I think for the most part, if you know what you're looking at it, you can generally get a good idea of how good a team is over 180 minutes despite the result. And in cases when it's two teams so familiar with each other, from the same damn league, I think it becomes a little more valid. Why did the greatest team ever from England get smoked by another team.... from England? Someone, please explain that to me. And please don't tell me that Liverpool is the 2nd greatest team ever from England, because at that point, we're handing out greatness cards like Oprah. If you want to say this season's edition has a claim, fine, I'd probably disagree, but it's more valid than 2017-18's edition.

Furthermore, I could easily make the argument our 2006-08 team was just as good, if not better than our 2017-18 side. And when we played United in the CL, they murdered us. That time, I actually came away from the tie thinking we were miles apart. There was no adjusting or clawing back, no glimmer of hope ...nothing.

And of course, I'm well aware how I view the game is just as flawed and biased as anyone else. Maybe the sample size is too small, or maybe I'm forgetting things, or maybe I'm just completely wrong - I dunno.

What I do know is, is that I'd really like to stop seeing City get knocked out of the CL by clubs from England. Not a great look for supposedly the country's greatest ever side. You should probably avoid doing that, one would think.

Yup. Well said. I definitely think they’re one of the best teams of all time, but they aren’t the definitive best team of all time for a lot of the reasons you mentioned above.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad