Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 29,398
- 25,268
Time for a new thread anyway, and I reckon the certainty over the pick makes it a good time. But hey, if we can't have the Laf, we can at least make jokes at Metallica's expense!
Here's the Capfriendly page - Pittsburgh Penguins - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps - let's crack on
Here's the Capfriendly page - Pittsburgh Penguins - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps - let's crack on
I'd leave Pettersson on the second pairing with Ristolainen. Dumo-Marino to take the brunt.
Fwiw, 3 points in 160 odd minutes with Tanger, 8 in 375 minutes with Pettersson, 6 in 147 with Dumo. Whether he'd maintain that Dumo pace, who can say, but it does at least look he hasn't flatlined when pushed up yet.
I think Parayko is a good comparison to Marino and St. Louis basically did a similar thing in moving Shattenkirk out when they found him and Parayko greatly suffered the next two years.
And we certainly saw him flat line in the playoffs.
I f***ing love the gift from god that is Marino, but if he ends up being a Parayko caliber defenseman
I have no idea who the Blues have in the system for goalies but couldn't CDS for Jake Allen as the principals work for both teams. Blues get a backup who isn't all that expensive/has some NHL experience AND $3.1M in cap space. We get a NHL vet with alot of experience and only has a single year left on contract.
Four games of nonsense. Couldn't care less what we saw from guys there by now - that's not how players will look in a well-motivated well-directed unit, and if we're not going to have one of them then this is all bollocks anyway.
But, that said, I wouldn't be that surprised if he did struggle with that, even if my confidence in him is sky high. Although a fall to current/2nd year Parayko offensive standards at 5v5 isn't the end of the world if Ristolainen is taking advantage of being the attacking guy.
I think you're running into a season next year where you're hoping everyone hits a peak instead of valley then.
I am officially anxious
Eh. This works with a little offensive regression from Marino, and it's not assuming any growth on Pettersson's part (which would ease things a lot). Can't have valley, but plateaus will do.
The only guy who has to peak is Ristolainen which of course is risky business.
But then, as I'm sure you're aware, there's pretty much no plan to move Letang and replace him that doesn't involve the incoming offensive dman having to peak. We lose the move in terms of talent (barring an insane peak/robbery) and that's that. The reason to do it stems from desire for a mental shake-up, desire not to just lose Letang for nothing but memories should we stick the course, and the half-suspicion that this team's ability to continue doing well without Letang is real and that we can move him and add to the team in other places and still be okay with a half-decent replacement.
Oh God.
They just showed JR.
He looks pissed that they kept him up past his bedtime.
Well, that's that. I think winning the Lafreniere sweepstakes was the one shot we had to kickstart the mini-rebuild needed to chase another Cup before the era of the big 3 ended. Without Lafreniere, I think there's too much to do to realistically have another shot.
Too much to do? Really?
1) we need a top 6 RW
a) we may have one in house already
2) we could upgrade at 3C
3) we need to make a decision on our goalie
4) we need a 3rd pairing RHD
5) we’d *like* to get rid of/bury JJ
That’s the extent of the work we need to do in my opinion. Every couple years there’s a “doom and gloom” mentality around here, and it’s always super dramatic and a waste of energy.
Idk, I feel like staying the course and only nibbling at small depth players won't make a difference in the long run
You need to get rid of JJ, bring in a top-6 RWer, completely restructure the 3rd line, revamp the 3rd pair, address the goalie situation and address the powerplay. Murray needs to be moved, McCann and Hornqvist should be moved and Letang should be considered a trade candidate.
Last edited: