Confirmed Trade: [PIT/OTT/VGK] PART II (see OP)

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,187
16,598
Moncton, NB





(Go to tweet to see full breakdown)

m6Y4v0R.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,187
16,598
Moncton, NB
The link to the previous thread is here. Just so everybody - myself included - understands...

To OTT: Cole (PIT), Gustavsson (PIT), PIT 1st 2018 (PIT), PIT 3rd 2019 (PIT)
To VGK: Reaves (PIT), VAN 4th 2018 (PIT)
TO PIT: Brassard (OTT; VGK retaining 40%), Lindberg (VGK), Dunn (OTT), OTT 3rd 2018 (OTT)
 

BronzeSpruce

Registered User
Mar 14, 2011
807
76
i like the trade but man pittsburgh has given up a lot of assets to end up with Brassard.

1st 2017, 1st 2018, 3rd 2019, 4th 2018, Gustavsson, Sundquist, Cole for 3rd 2018, Lindberg, Dunn and 40% Brassard
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,200
79,189
Redmond, WA
i like the trade but man pittsburgh has given up a lot of assets to end up with Brassard.

1st 2017, 1st 2018, 3rd 2019, 4th 2018, Gustavsson, Sundquist, Cole for 3rd 2018, Lindberg, Dunn and 40% Brassard

You're not including the 2nd rounder that the Penguins got back in the Reaves trade.

I'm curious how these four separate transactions actually played out.



This thread sums up all of the trades. To summarize, it was:

1. Vegas trades Lindberg to Pittsburgh for Pittsburgh's 2019 3rd
2. Vegas trades Pittsburgh's 2019 3rd to Ottawa for Brassard
3. Vegas trades Brassard with 40% retention to Pittsburgh for Reaves and Vancouver's 2018 4th (acquired in the Pouliot deal)
4. Pittsburgh trades Cole, Gustavsson and a 2018 1st to Ottawa for Dunn and a 2018 3rd
 

Spectra

Registered boozer
Aug 3, 2005
2,520
459
i like the trade but man pittsburgh has given up a lot of assets to end up with Brassard.

1st 2017, 1st 2018, 3rd 2019, 4th 2018, Gustavsson, Sundquist, Cole for 3rd 2018, Lindberg, Dunn and 40% Brassard

Incorrect. They also have: 2nd 2017 (Zachary Lauzon) in the "return" column if you are breaking it down like that.

Unclear if people have memory loss or reading comprehension issues when breaking down the Reaves to PIT trade, it's not really THAT complicated is it?
 

Shockmaster

Registered User
Sep 11, 2012
16,009
3,378
i like the trade but man pittsburgh has given up a lot of assets to end up with Brassard.

1st 2017, 1st 2018, 3rd 2019, 4th 2018, Gustavsson, Sundquist, Cole for 3rd 2018, Lindberg, Dunn and 40% Brassard

Sundqvist is in the AHL, and those picks and prospects won’t make any impact in the NHL for several years, when the Penguins won’t be contending anyways.
 

wej20

Registered User
Aug 14, 2008
27,973
1,938
UK
Incorrect. They also have: 2nd 2017 (Zachary Lauzon) in the "return" column if you are breaking it down like that.

Unclear if people have memory loss or reading comprehension issues when breaking down the Reaves to PIT trade, it's not really THAT complicated is it?

Everyone loved to say Pens traded Reaves for a 1st.
 

CraigBillington

Registered User
Dec 10, 2010
1,678
1,453
This thread sums up all of the trades. To summarize, it was:

1. Vegas trades Lindberg to Pittsburgh for Pittsburgh's 2019 3rd
2. Vegas trades Pittsburgh's 2019 3rd to Ottawa for Brassard
3. Vegas trades Brassard with 40% retention to Pittsburgh for Reaves and Vancouver's 2018 4th (acquired in the Pouliot deal)
4. Pittsburgh trades Cole, Gustavsson and a 2018 1st to Ottawa for Dunn and a 2018 3rd
That's crazy, the Lindberg for a 3rd was about the only fair trade of the bunch haha.
Though, depending what Ottawa gets out of Cole, they could have got quite a package if things turn out in the future. I'm not sure what he's actually qorth, but if some feel he could get a 1st... Though I bet he gets a 2nd and a prospect
 

BronzeSpruce

Registered User
Mar 14, 2011
807
76
Incorrect. They also have: 2nd 2017 (Zachary Lauzon) in the "return" column if you are breaking it down like that.

Unclear if people have memory loss or reading comprehension issues when breaking down the Reaves to PIT trade, it's not really THAT complicated is it?
i stated that the next post, i forgot the 2nd so its all there
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,200
79,189
Redmond, WA
That's crazy, the Lindberg for a 3rd was about the only fair trade of the bunch haha.
Though, depending what Ottawa gets out of Cole, they could have got quite a package if things turn out in the future. I'm not sure what he's actually qorth, but if some feel he could get a 1st... Though I bet he gets a 2nd and a prospect

I don't think he gets that much. A 2nd is probably a safe guess for him, but it depends on how many teams are looking for defensemen at the deadline I think. Maybe he can get something like a 2nd and a 4th.
 

BronzeSpruce

Registered User
Mar 14, 2011
807
76
It was a late first for reeves and a second rd pick. 31st overall which would’ve been a second rounder the year before. To gloss over that and say a first for reeves is misleading.

i did add the 2nd in there for Reaves. im not trying to argue the trades im stating its a lot of assets that have went in several different directions for a round about way to getting Brassard
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankisbad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad