I never want to go to court
In the presence of Mr. Tindall and his complete knowledge of the transaction and his strong inclination to correct misstatements, I find the clear statement that a portion of the parking rights is conveyed via the AMULA of 2001 to be very troubling.
I think the record is less than clear. It was like taking a deposition of 8 people at the same time. I don't know that his failure to correct was because he 1) didn't follow what was being said, 2) agreed with what was being said, 3) was focusing on Darcy's mad steer down of the mayor, 4) thinking about what was for dinner or about having another cup cake, 5) ran out of steam at that point, or ....
What I am saying is, I don't put too much stock in the transcript since its inadmissable anyway as no one was under oath. Going back to the documents which will be admissable, I think they demonstrate that the 2,900 lots are not part of what is assumable under the Moyes estate.