Phoenix XXIX: What's the next act? I'm tired of the dog & pony show

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by LadyStanley, Mar 20, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LadyStanley

    LadyStanley RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    75,594
    Likes Received:
    3,144
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Sin City
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2011
  2. Whileee

    Whileee Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    34,312
    Likes Received:
    7,784
    Trophy Points:
    156
    And I am puzzled as to why you seem to think that you repeating your position is reasonable, and my consistent response is not. I only repeated my position when I saw you once again repeating yours, with which I disagree. I will be happy to cease posting on this topic if you plan to do so as well.

    Are you referring to this sort of document about previous financials (http://docs.bmcgroup.com/phoenixcoyotes/docs/azb_2-09-bk-9488_472.pdf)?

    If so, I have perused this and did not find it too difficult to total up $15-20 million in expenses beyond arena management and hockey / coach salaries and travel. Could you with certainty specify which items in the list of Expenses are clearly excluded from the "Arena Management Fee"? If so, I would like to know how you have done that.

    For example, would the $9.5 million in "Ownership Expenses", "League Expenses" and "Other Management Expense" be excluded from eligible costs? If so, why were they not explicitly excluded as were player / coach salaries, travel and equipment? In addition, how would the $7 million for Business, Finance and Admin, Ticketing and Broadcasting be treated?
     
  3. billy blaze

    billy blaze Registered User

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. Tinalera

    Tinalera Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    6,516
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    The Known Universe
    Alright a new thread! There must some news......:handclap:


    Oh, no news...:(

    Hopefully we get some news tomorrow?

    Please? :help:
     
  5. OthmarAmmann

    OthmarAmmann Omnishambles

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Location:
    NYC
    This situation is becoming lame and boring.
     
  6. Grumpz

    Grumpz Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Couldn't agree more. The NHL has had ever opportunity to make this like the winning bid announcement for the Olympics.

    Which ever way it goes, the Coyotes leave or stay.

    Instead this thing has been strung out, slapping the face of every logical person on the planet who realizes this should be over.

    Anti-climactic to say the least.
     
  7. Brodie

    Brodie Marxist-Harbaughist

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    15,098
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Michigan
    This has been my reaction to like the last 4 threads
     
  8. Faltorvo

    Faltorvo Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    18,205
    Likes Received:
    488
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Scouts , trainers, medical personnel,
     
  9. Blue Shakehead

    Blue Shakehead because lol Jets

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    2,966
    Likes Received:
    1,287
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Home Page:
    As a side note, the Coyotes ticket revenues were $13,328,609 for 2008-09 according to these documents. They lost $27 million. To get an idea of real attendance as opposed to announced, if we use the posted $37/ticket average for 41 games, we get an average of 8,786 fans per game. I realize this isn't scientific.

    The NHL's published attendance for the Coyotes for 2009-09 was 14,875, which either means they are lying (likely) or that the average ticket was $21/game (even more likely). Probably a mixture of both.

    This year, they stand to lose $40 million.
     
  10. kdb209

    kdb209 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    14,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    126
    12-08-2008 Hockey in The Desert (Phoenix franchise and finance/business matters)
    02-04-2009 Hockey in the Desert II (Phoenix Coyotes franchise and business matters)

    05-05-2009 Balsillie puts in $212.5 mil offer for the Coyotes
    05-07-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix part II
    05-18-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix part III
    05-22-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix part IV
    06-03-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix part V
    06-09-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix Part VI
    06-12-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix Part VII: I'm just waitin' on a judge
    06-16-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix Part VIII: It's dead, Jim
    06-24-2009 Balsillie/Phoenix Part IX: 'Dorf on Hockey
    07-25-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part X: The Truth? You Can't Handle The Truth!
    08-03-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XI: A Fistful of Dollars?
    08-07-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XII: For a Few Dollars More
    08-12-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XIII: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
    08-21-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XIV: The Wrath of Baum
    08-27-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XV - SITREP: SNAFU
    09-02-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XVI: Barbarian at the Gate
    09-08-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XVII: Wake Me Up When September Ends
    09-10-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy/ownership Part XVIII: Is that a pale horse in the distance?
    09-12-2009 Phoenix bankruptcy Part XIX: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Baum
    09-21-2009 Phoenix Bankruptcy Part XX: There Will Be Baum
    09-28-2009 Phoenix Bankruptcy Part XXI: 2009 -- A Sports Odyssey
    10-26-2009 Phoenix Bankruptcy Part XXII: Long and winding road

    11-24-2009 Keeping up with potential owners for NHL Phoenix Coyotes (UPD: Ice Edge signs LOI)
    03-14-2010 Part II. Potential owners of NHL's Phoenix Coyotes
    03-26-2010 Part III. Prospective Owners - Phoenix Coyotes (UPD Lease vote 4/13; IEH signs MOU)
    04-10-2010 Part IV Phoenix Coyotes post bankrtuptcy; UPD COG approves Reinsdorf MOU, not IEH MOU
    05-02-2010 Part V Phoenix Coyotes post bankruptcy UPD Reinsdorf out? IEH back in? else Winnipeg?
    05-11-2010 Part VI Phoenix Coyotes post bankruptcy
    05-23-2010 Part VII Phoenix Coyotes post bankrtuptcy
    06-07-2010 Part VIII: Phoenix Coyotes Post-bankrtuptcy
    06-22-2010 Part IX: Phoenix Coyotes Post-bankruptcy UPD: Pres Moss fired 6/30 with IEH input
    07-26-2010 Part X: Phoenix Coyotes - Between Scylla and Charybdis
    08-27-2010 Part XI: Phoenix Coyotes -- Greetings, Starfighter, You have been selected ...
    09-16-2010 Part XII: Phx Coyotes - Still haven't found what I'm looking for
    10-12-2010 Part XIII: Phoenix Coyotes - The Final Cut?
    10-27-2010 Part XIV: Phoenix Coyotes - To Infinity And Beyond....
    12-05-2010 Part XV: Phoenix - the battle of evermore
    12-14-2010 Part XVI: Phoenix -- Money for Nothing
    12-20-2010 Part XVII: Phoenix -- Thread Title Available For Lease
    01-09-2011 Part XVIII: Phoenix -- Imminence Front
    01-24-2011 Phoenix XIXth: Nervous Breakdown
    02-02-2011 Phoenix XX: Two weeks
    02-11-2011 Phoenix XXI: When will then be now?
    02-22-2011 Phoenix XXII: It's Now or Never
    02-28-2011 Phoenix XXIII - Bond: The Phoenix Project
    03-03-2011 Phoenix XXIV: How many twists does the scriptwriter have left?
    03-07-2011 Phoenix XXV: Anyone in the theatre seen a pale horse?
    03-08-2011 Phoenix XXVI: Pain in the AZ
    03-11-2011 Phoenix XXVII: Can we all get along?
    03-16-2011 Phoenix XXVIII: Lawyers, Bonds and Money
    03-20-2011 Phoenix XXIX: What's the next act? I'm tired of the dog & pony show
     
  11. Donwood

    Donwood Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    May be some news on tonights WGN broadcast of the Black Hawks - Coyotes.
     
  12. Dado

    Dado Guest

    I second that emotion.
     
  13. wpgJetsfan

    wpgJetsfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For those who wants news, I'm sorry but you'll be waiting much longer. The NHL will not give any REAL News or answers until the Coyotes are done for the season or the playoffs whichever comes first. I still think May 1st we will get our answers.
     
  14. GSC2k2*

    GSC2k2* Guest

    Actually, I was not repeating mine. I was responding to Ghost's unsupported assertion that the expenses were "grossly inflated", which I take as some sort of suggestion that MH is going to make more than he spends. Post whatever you want, but it is getting tedious on my end, at least.

    Yes.

    - with the exception of "media relations" (which is arguably a promotional expense at $600k), anything above the "Total Hockey Expenses" line would be excluded.

    - pretty well all of "Total Business Expenses" would be split 50/50 as advertising and promotional expenses, but keep in mind that the consultant reports issued while Moyes was trying to get his own deal with CoG indicated that the expenses were grossly inflated, so it is a safe bet that MH will run a tighter ship than the absentee owner Moyes). $16.6M - (20% for efficiency) = $13.4M x 50% = $6.7M

    - League Expenses fails the GAAP test as a non-hockey related expense. They are also in any event primarily levies of the league to cover league-wide insurance and benefits (benefits alone are ~$2.2M)and are thus ineligible as "benefits expenses".

    - Ownership expense is a separate payment to Moyes that he was making to himself, so it is not relevant.

    - Other Ownership Expenses is also a Moyes related-party transaction, and is therefore irrelevant for our purposes.

    - Jobing.com other expenses is probably eligible for reimbursement ($370k).

    - As for AMG operations, that relates to the Arena Management Group expenses, which is another kettle of fish in those financials:

    (i) About $6.1M in Event Expenses, consisting of "event labour" and "event expenses", which may be tighter with the NHL in charge;

    (ii) About $5.3M in Non-Event Expenses, consisting of a variety of direct arena costs which I would not quibble with, although they may be tighter as well with the NHL in charge;

    (iii) About $2.4M in "overhead allocations" from Moyes' other corporate organization for HR, Legal, F&A, IT and executive, despite the hockey team also having all of those services. This is an entry for a Moyes related-party transaction, and I will not count it.

    I will take the $11.4M, deduct 10% for efficiency (not 20% as above, because hopefully the arena may need more event labour for more events), leaving $10.2M.

    So, we have a rough estimate of $6.7M + $600k + $370k + $10.2M, giving us ~$17.9M.

    Does that get us further down the road? Does it at least make the question of jacking up the numbers artificially relatively moot?

    EDIT: Note that the math that I have done above does not rely on anything other than actual expenses directed to the arena, even in the definition that you choose to accept. IMO, it truly does dispose of the nefarious schemes that you had in mind for MH to jack up the numbers.
     
    Last edited by moderator : Mar 20, 2011
  15. Donwood

    Donwood Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    Altough your assuming thats if the bonds don't sell. If Bettman can close the sale you can bet I'll do it ASAP.
     
  16. Whileee

    Whileee Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    34,312
    Likes Received:
    7,784
    Trophy Points:
    156
    It has nothing to do with "jacking up the expenses" in my opinion, but rather an overly broad definition of "non-hockey related expenses". I happen to think that you are making unwarranted assumptions about what might and might not be included in Team expenses. I didn't mention any of the $53 million in hockey operations, but I expect that not all of that is for coach and player salaries / travel and equipment, so some of that will be eligible.

    Suffice to say, non-hockey related expenses are not defined in the Lease as you or I might define them. Instead, they only explicitly exclude a narrow set of specific hockey-related expenses. I am not sure how GAAP helps clarifies this since it is based on the contractual definition of eligibility of expenses, not how they are accounted. Anyway, if this deal proceeds we will see how this is interpreted, and I remain confident that we will see much wider latitude in the expenses that are deemed "non-hockey related" and therefore eligible under the "arena management fee" than you are suggesting.

    I agree it is getting tedious, and won't post anything more on this subject. Other posters can read the lease and financial statements and come to their own conclusions.
     
  17. Blue Shakehead

    Blue Shakehead because lol Jets

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    2,966
    Likes Received:
    1,287
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Home Page:
    In addition to his $97 million in arena management fees (read: present from the City of Glendale, albeit not a gift in the context of the AZ constitution), I wonder if Hulsizer will be taking an egg management fee.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgdTymCZowU
     
  18. King Woodballs

    King Woodballs Captain Awesome

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,799
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Your Mind
    Maybe this saga will soon....
    Or maybe not...
     
  19. Confucius

    Confucius Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,800
    Likes Received:
    619
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Toronto
  20. bleuet

    bleuet Guest

    Gee I am sorry I missed the title contest.

    My suggestions would've been

    The waiting game
    or
    Read my lips: No news in Phoenix
    or
    Art of extending the imminence.
     
  21. Tendencyman

    Tendencyman Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2002
    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Home Page:
    I got a feeling that Bettman will never allow Coyotes to be re-located.
     
  22. PitbulI

    PitbulI Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Logan will not like that fee.

    So no one really has any idea what's going on eh? Did the bonds sell or simply taken off the market due to not finding a buyer?
     
  23. GSC2k2*

    GSC2k2* Guest

    Well, having now done the calculations, I am afraid I won't let you off that easy, whileee. I think there is a further "accounting" to be done here. :)

    As I showed, even if one aggressively assumes (as I did) that MH will cut arena costs by 10-20%, we still have the direct arena costs at a minimum of $17.9M. My aggressive cost reduction assumptions may be invalid if, as one might expect, Hulsizer is going to undertake a massive promotional and advertising campaign after he acquires the team. In fact, the structure of the deal reflects this, with more money available in the first 2.5 years.:

    Since it is now clear that Hulsizer will likely start from a 2008-09 base of $17.9M in indisputable no-trickery arena management costs, even without considering escalation in the first couple of years to do a promo carpetbombing, let's do some math.

    First off, the $17.9M is based on 2008-09 numbers, so let's add 2% annual inflation, so we have a 2010-11 number of $18.6M. We will add 2% per annum for inflation going forward as well.

    First Half Year (now) - $10M maximum amount, less $9.3M (50% of $18.6M) in true direct arena costs = $700k in remaining room for your potential shenanigans (not so at all, if one accepts my interpretation).

    Year 1 - $20M, less $19.0M (without any speculative marketing blitz), leaving $1M in room.

    Year 2 - $20M, less $19.4M (without any speculative marketing blitz), leaving $600k in room.

    Year 3 - $17M, less $19.8M, leaving a shortfall for Hulsizer that he must fund of $2.8M.

    Year 4 - $15M, less $20.2M, leaving a shortfall for Hulsizer that he must fund of $5.2M.

    Year 5 - $15M, less $20.6M, leaving a shortfall for Hulsizer that he must fund of $5.6M.

    Based on the above, this would leave Hulsizer short for direct arena management expenses, without Hulsizer doing any of your proposed padding, by $13.6M.

    Now, even if you allow for Hulsizer to use up the remaining room in the amounts for things which are "really hockey-related" because of an overly broad definition, we have Hulsizer not getting covered for legitimate arena management costs to the tune of $11.3M

    Let's let that sink in: this $97M, this supposed generous "gift", is not going to cover all of Hulsizer's direct arena operating expenses, to the tune of $13.6 million (or $11.3M, if you continue to insist that Hulsizer is going to be allowed to use this for hockey costs).

    Hulsizer - the guy who is getting this team "for free" - is going to have to come up with this money, in addition to his equity investment and his team losses.

    AND THAT is not even accounting for any kind of promo and advertising blitz to try to get the market - especially the corporate market - to recover. Most of that money is going to come out of Hulsizer's pocket, unless he used the $2.3M in room noted above (which then makes it not available for any shenanigans). AND that is assuming that he and the NHL could wring 10-20% in efficiencies out of operations from Moyes' operations.

    As for what this means to your longtime assertions that this fee was ripe for Hulsizer to funnel huge amounts of hockey expenses and get reimbursed for them, that notion is now refuted by basic mathematics. So, you're right, we are probably done on this, although not for the reason you may have intended. :) ;)
     
  24. metalfoot

    metalfoot Karlsson!

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Manitoba, Canada
    Still, though, why should the city reimburse him AT ALL for these expenses?
     
  25. cbcwpg

    cbcwpg Registered User

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    12,065
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Between the Pipes
    Bettman is trying to figure out how he is going to break the news to his wife about how he just bought $100M in potential "junk" bonds.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"