SoCalShark
Registered User
Well, that's some of the highlights of issues of having a team in Vegas. YMMV.
LS, I think you summed up the issues with Las Vegas very well. The economy is in the tank there and I know because I was looking to relocate. There are no tangible jobs for my industry at the level of income required to be a STH.
The NHL might have to go the Expos route and move the franchise to a market with fan interest and an NHL quality arena. The bar has been lowered a bit now that MTS in Winnipeg is considered a suitable site.
Every market mentioned earlier has its issues!
Quebec - Fan interest, potential owner but no current or approved arena
Kansas City - Arena w/ possible ownership but luke warm fan interest (is that why the Pens are playing a pre-season game there to gage fan support)
Portland - Arena but no interested ownership and unproven fan support (WHL team but not an AHL/ECHL team)
Houston - Arena w/ an owner that showed an interest a while ago and some fan support (Aeros of the AHL) but with a non-traditional NHL sports saturated market (a la Atlanta).
Hamilton - Arena (needs upgrades) with fan support (Ballsile ticket drive) and a possible owner (rumors of interested parties) but the fees associated encroachment of Toronto / Buffalo markets would be costly.
Seattle - No Arena, possible ownership group and unproven fan support (see Portland).
Las Vegas is not a long term realistic option. The Pacific Northwest could work but the rumored Seattle ownership group would have to use Portland's arena to really get the franchise going. So the NHL would have to pick its poison and the Pens playing in KC might be an indicator the way the NHL is thinking.
Winnipeg was the perfect storm of ownership, fans and arena at the right time.
Last edited: