Phoenix LIV:E and Let Die

Status
Not open for further replies.

SpcmanSpiff

Registered User
Mar 6, 2011
40
0
Reading between the lines...

it sounds like judge won't grant an injunction, but City admits it's not an emergency, so there is some ability to file for a referendum over the lease?

Lisa Halverstadt ‏@LisaHalverstadt

Birnbaum: At least one party in Goldwater suit went to #Glendale city clerk's office to get referendum papers already. #Coyotes



Sounds like it could happen.
 

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,231
4,316
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
Really sounds like the judge is tearing Birnbaum to shreds.


As a trial lawyer sometimes the judge really digs into you because they're just testing what you have to say because they're about to do exactly what you are asking them to do. The worst response from a judge is actually no response at all.
 

CGG

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
4,136
55
416
The crux of Glendale's argument seems to be that Mr. Jamison is the only person on the planet who's a professional arena manager, and has specific skills, therefore you can pay him $325 million without looking at competitive bids. You need a "professional" to manage the arena, with specific skills, therefore don't need to put the AMF up for competitive bidding.

Judge: "What about a window washer. Doesn't he have specific skills? Couldn't you put the word professional in front of any job title?"

This is hilarious.
 

GuelphStormer

Registered User
Mar 20, 2012
3,811
499
Guelph, ON
The crux of Glendale's argument seems to be that Mr. Jamison is the only person on the planet who's a professional arena manager, and has specific skills, therefore you can pay him $325 million without looking at competitive bids. You need a "professional" to manage the arena, with specific skills, therefore don't need to put the AMF up for competitive bidding.

to be fair, I think his argument is that jamison is the only one buying the coyotes and only the owner of the coyotes is professionally qualified to run the arena. I dont buy it, but I dont think its that absurd an argument.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,433
46,311
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
The crux of Glendale's argument seems to be that Mr. Jamison is the only person on the planet who's a professional arena manager, and has specific skills, therefore you can pay him $325 million without looking at competitive bids. You need a "professional" to manage the arena, with specific skills, therefore don't need to put the AMF up for competitive bidding.

Judge: "What about a window washer. Doesn't he have specific skills? Couldn't you put the word professional in front of any job title?"

This is hilarious.

Really? That's what you took from Glendale's argument? I think it's pretty obvious what they are saying is Jamison is the only professional arena manager that also plans to provide an anchor tenant for 40+ dates a year, in the form of the Phoenix Coyotes NHL franchise.

They are correct. The competitive bid issue really isn't an issue. It's just hot air.
 

Vinc360

Registered User
Apr 3, 2008
1,746
121
When is the BOG meeting exactly? We can expect media coverage surrounding the event right?
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,131
Really? That's what you took from Glendale's argument? I think it's pretty obvious what they are saying is Jamison is the only professional arena manager that also plans to provide an anchor tenant for 40+ dates a year, in the form of the Phoenix Coyotes NHL franchise.

They are correct. The competitive bid issue really isn't an issue. It's just hot air.

I tend to agree with this, but from a purely objective perspective it would be difficult to for a judge to determine whether the Coyotes are needed or not for the arena. There are arenas that are managed by a professional firm (other than Jamison), without a major sports team as an anchor tenant, that have done just fine. They are not examining the financial arguments related to the financial pros and cons of the AMF, so it might be difficult for a judge to accept that including the Coyotes is an indispensable requirement for arena management.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,433
46,311
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
It's not really his job though, is it? GWI's argument was that THIS AMF was not competitively bid, right? Can't be. As COG said, it's beyond that scope.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,433
46,311
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Here's a thought...

The NHL is prepared to allow this process to take as long as it needs during the summer. They are prepared to attempt to make the Jamison deal work until mid August. If it all falls through, and looks as though there is no hope to avoid owning the Coyotes for another season, they sell them to PKP for 170mil. The catch? He's got to own and operate the Phoenix Coyotes for the 2012-2013 season. He's got to incur all of the losses in Glendale for that one lame duck season in jobing.com arena. Then, he can relocate them to QC as soon as their season is through.

HAHA :sarcasm:
 

Mungman

It's you not me.
Mar 27, 2011
2,988
0
Outside the Asylum
Here's a thought...

The NHL is prepared to allow this process to take as long as it needs during the summer. They are prepared to attempt to make the Jamison deal work until mid August. If it all falls through, and looks as though there is no hope to avoid owning the Coyotes for another season, they sell them to PKP for 170mil. The catch? He's got to own and operate the Phoenix Coyotes for the 2012-2013 season. He's got to incur all of the losses in Glendale for that one lame duck season in jobing.com arena. Then, he can relocate them to QC as soon as their season is through.

HAHA :sarcasm:

Well, that's basically how it went down in the move from WPG to PHX, so there'd be a bit of symmetry there.
 

viper0220

Registered User
Oct 10, 2008
8,553
3,486
Can the NHL get dragged into this some how, I really wish that happens and the NHL has to go to court as well.
 

viper0220

Registered User
Oct 10, 2008
8,553
3,486
Here's a thought...

The NHL is prepared to allow this process to take as long as it needs during the summer. They are prepared to attempt to make the Jamison deal work until mid August. If it all falls through, and looks as though there is no hope to avoid owning the Coyotes for another season, they sell them to PKP for 170mil. The catch? He's got to own and operate the Phoenix Coyotes for the 2012-2013 season. He's got to incur all of the losses in Glendale for that one lame duck season in jobing.com arena. Then, he can relocate them to QC as soon as their season is through.

HAHA :sarcasm:


That is a possibility.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,347
12,709
South Mountain
I tend to agree with this, but from a purely objective perspective it would be difficult to for a judge to determine whether the Coyotes are needed or not for the arena. There are arenas that are managed by a professional firm (other than Jamison), without a major sports team as an anchor tenant, that have done just fine. They are not examining the financial arguments related to the financial pros and cons of the AMF, so it might be difficult for a judge to accept that including the Coyotes is an indispensable requirement for arena management.

The judge doesn't have to accept that the team is indispensable to rule in CoG's favor. For GWI to win he would have to go much further than just determining the team isn't indispensable, but that CoG is barred from even including the team/arena operations in a sole source deal.

The more difficult it is for the judge to assess whether the team is needed or not the more deference he'll have to give to the CoG's determination that it is needed.
 

GordonGraham

Registered User
Sep 12, 2009
3,856
1,250
If this goes to a referendum do you think the league will stay put and roll the dice hoping for a win or get out of there ASAP to avoid a lost?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad