Edgy
Registered User
- Nov 30, 2009
- 3,848
- 3,719
Either you're numerating for comparison purposes or you have no point at all. Why would you list all those players, sarcastically call them 3rd liners if it wasn't a jab at everyone saying Danault isn't a first line center? Cut the crap, you made a stupid comparison.i don't call that a comparison at all, but an enumeration of the players who shared the same kind of numbers . It isn't a personal evaluation of their style-value-skills , but an official statistic that i have reported . As someone mentioned , Bergeron missed 8 games because he was and still is injured
I am relaxed, I just hate blatant homerism.Relax Edgy
Ugh...the whole time the article writer says Bergeron is better but if Danault could improve to Bergeron's level he could be our Bergeron. Well no shit sherlock!That said , if you want to compare both Danault and Bergeron , you can read this article that do it ; Could the Canadiens have their own Patrice Bergeron in Phillip Danault?
The biggest difference between the 2, is that Danault has started to play younger and is a better scorer . But their numbers after xxx games are not that far .
edited ; put Danault instead of Bergevin in the last sentence
Last edited: