Flowah
Registered User
- Nov 30, 2009
- 10,249
- 547
I hadn't heard that before.Keep in mind Datsyuk entered negotiations asking for 5 years.
I have and will always have a much bigger problem with what Datsyuk did than Fedorov.
I hadn't heard that before.Keep in mind Datsyuk entered negotiations asking for 5 years.
I have and will always have a much bigger problem with what Datsyuk did than Fedorov.
https://www.freep.com/story/sports/...l-datsyuk-leaving-detroit-red-wings/86081818/I hadn't heard that before.
“In 2013, Gary Greenstin wanted a five-year deal,” Holland said. “What do you think would have happened if I’d countered with one year deal? He would have been on another team.
It took a June 2015 meeting with team owner Mike Ilitch to convince Datsyuk to come back for the 2015-16 season, with the understanding the Wings would not fight Datsyuk leaving this summer and wanting to continue his career in Russia’s KHL.
Datsyuk left when we were bad, when he was past his prime and went back to Russia. I have no real issue with Pavel getting honored.
Fedorov tried to force his way off a top contender while in his prime. Tried to financially break Ilitch in order to go.
To have an issue with Pavel but not Sergei makes me believe you'd have to have been too young to remember Fedorov's antics here and just know him from highlight reels. He was a ******* who didn't want to be here and went to excessive lengths to try and force his way out of Detroit. You don't reward that with a legacy honor of a number in the rafters. At most I'd show respect to the caliber of player he was and him being in the HOF by taking #91 out of circulation, unofficially retire it if you will.
I started watching the Wings in the early 80s so have seen enough of Fedorov to know that's not the case about going to excessive lengths to get out of Detroit. He could be mercurial and frustrating for sure. And the offer sheet was a tough pill to swallow. When fans saw Fedorov take over games seemingly at will the question was always "why doesn't he do that more often?"
But he didn't want out of Detroit. He still spends part of his summers in Michigan and considers it home. What he always seemed to want was the recognition, pay and ice time as the #1 guy on the Wings. That was never going to happen with Yzerman here. Or maybe he just wanted more credit than he was getting in the shadow of Yzerman. He got a lot of praise but the guy was a beast.
I think I have a pretty rare opinion on this, but I wish teams didn't retire numbers. The way I look at it is that it's the player inside the uniform we loved, not the number. I'd rather we allowed others to wears the numbers in their honor.
Your opinion on this issue shouldn't be rare at all. I for one agree with you 100%!!
Way too many primary hockey numbers between 1 and 19 have been retired without just cause were the bar was set too low! Retiring numbers is one hocket tradition that actually subverts hockey tradition. The way this is subversive is the fact that we see so many non-traditional football numbers between 50 and 99, largely due to the inordinate amount of primary hockey numbers that have been retired.
One example on the Detroit Red Wings that really irritates me is Larry Aurie's number 6 being taken out of circulation. This for a player who hasn't played since the 1930's!! It bothers me to see Dekyser wearing 65 when he should wearing number 6. This is just one of many examples.
It annoys me when a number is out of circulation but not retired. Retire it or let someone wear it... make up your mind.
Aurie's family being against the decision to take it down probably does factor here. I am curious though if they will finally go both feet in if they do with the Jack Hughes lottery. He wears 6 and 43 generally just like his brother. So I would be fascinated if Detroit issued him #6.
The big one here is #16 in Detroit. I personally would love to see that go to a special player. Like it would be awesome if Larkin ditched his goofy #71 for it tomorrow. Like I get not issuing it to just anyone, but they clearly at this point aren't going to retire Vladdy, so lets see the number again but only on special talent type guys.
The Wings do take this seriously. For several years after the league retired #99, they put in their program that they did not honor or acknowledge that league decision. Which I thought was amazing.
#16 I get and am ok with.
We’ve had several prospects who wear #91, and there will be more because it is a pretty popular number. I imagine we will have some defenseman that want to wear #6 as well.
So my take is let them wear it or retire it. Don’t straddle the fence. I would personally retire both, but I just think it’s silly they choose to “partially honor” those guys.
For several years after the league retired #99, they put in their program that they did not honor or acknowledge that league decision. Which I thought was amazing.
Wait, why is that amazing?
They put in their NHL programs that they didn't honor it. Now as any old curmudgeon at the JLA would have told you back when they were doing it, if you aren't going to honor Mr. Hockey than nobody should have their jersey retired league-wide. That is why they did it openly too, again putting it right in their NHL programs on game night league logo and all right there too. It is a fairly shocking step, I have been told by people the league office were pretty unhappy about it.
There will be much conversation. And thought.
Kelly I think helps open a door for Fedorov in terms of who is currently up there.
Many of the families won't be happy I'm sure. Besides that, 15 retired numbers isn't that bad. The players would still have 83 numbers to choose from.I'm of the belief that retired numbers should only extend until the year after the death of the player. You can honor the player another way after their death, but put it puts these good numbers back in circulation and it cuts out a lot of these arguments over who really deserves to have their numbers retired. Just for arguments sake, let's say 30 years from now, we have 4 more guys that "deserve" to have their numbers retired. If we keep the current 7, add Kelly, Zetterberg, Fedorov, Datsyuk, and 4 future stars, suddenly you have 15 numbers out of circulation. In 30 years, numbers 1, 4, 7, 9, 10, and 12 back on the ice, with 5, 13, 19, 40, 91, and 4 others in the rafters.
Many of the families won't be happy I'm sure. Besides that, 15 retired numbers isn't that bad. The players would still have 83 numbers to choose from.
Fedorov left as a free agent
Datsyuk bailed on an active contract
what Datsyuk did will always be a million times worse to me and i'll be downright insulted if he gets his number retired before Fedorov,and honestly Datsyuk's number probably shouldn't be retired at all
lots of teams have retired numbers of players that have gone to other teams in free agency in the twilight of their careers(look at like half of Montreal's retired numbers for examle)
how many teams have retired numbers of players that have done anything remotely similar to what Datsyuk did?