aufheben
#Norris4Fox
Updated: 03/11/2021
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
PK% | 87.18 | 2nd |
PPGA | 10 | T-3rd |
PPAO | 78 | 17th |
PIM/G | 9.6 | 25th |
SHG | 2 | T-5th |
Last edited:
PK% | 87.18 | 2nd |
PPGA | 10 | T-3rd |
PPAO | 78 | 17th |
PIM/G | 9.6 | 25th |
SHG | 2 | T-5th |
that really changes a lot of things. My gripe with him, or the team in general was that there's too many 'top6 oriented' players. Buch and even Kreider have been a nice surprise on the PKBuchnevich is surprisingly fantastic at PK'ing
I think the size of the hexagon is how much ice time the player has on the PK and the thickness of the line between any two players increases the more time they spend on the ice together.What does the second chart actually show? I read the label and know what it's supposed to show but I have trouble interpreting it. Guy should change his handle to @IneffectiveCharts.
What does the second chart actually show? I read the label and know what it's supposed to show but I have trouble interpreting it. Guy should change his handle to @IneffectiveCharts.
I see that Johnson likely plays frequently with Trouba but still gets fewer minutes than Lindgren. Still, I do wonder why he gets more minutes than Miller on the PK, though our biggest weakness is actually on the right (chart 1) — which indicates Trouba is likely the true weak link, given his playing time relative to that of the other RDs (chart 2).I can't figure out what the point of the chart is at this point. It's completely incomprehensible.
I see that Johnson likely plays frequently with Trouba but still gets fewer minutes than Lindgren. Still, I do wonder why he gets more minutes than Miller on the PK, though our biggest weakness is actually on the right (chart 1) — which indicates Trouba is likely the true weak link, given his playing time relative to that of the other RDs (chart 2).
In short: Trouba sucks.
Buchnevich is surprisingly fantastic at PK'ing
Kreider tooBuchnevich is surprisingly fantastic at PK'ing
They can be linked because partners change. You can have Trouba playing PK1 the whole time with his partner changing game to game (for example).How can two different sized hexagons be linked? How many shared minutes is that when each hexagon is a set amount of minutes, it's very confusing.
Edit: I guess it's based on how fat the links are.
What does the second chart actually show? I read the label and know what it's supposed to show but I have trouble interpreting it. Guy should change his handle to @IneffectiveCharts.
Size of hexagon = ice-timeI can't figure out what the point of the chart is at this point. It's completely incomprehensible.
Size of hexagon = ice-time
Size of lines = shared ice-time
Maybe I’m just a visual thinker but it’s clear for me?
It's a bit goofy. I mean, a spreadsheet might have been easier to see the info but advanced stats = advaaaaanced graphs.Yeah, I think I kind of figured it out later. It didn't realize the lines were also a factor until later.
Sorry I would have added some notes but honestly I was just bored on my lunch break and made this thread on my phone.Yeah, I think I kind of figured it out later. It didn't realize the lines were also a factor until later.
Sorry.It's a bit goofy. I mean, a spreadsheet might have been easier to see the info but advanced stats = advaaaaanced graphs.
I personally don't understand what % availability means. Is that the % of time they were standing around not actively engaged in the play and thus available or open?