I don't get that coach. It does seem his strategy is to do just that, but if so it's not working. Sharks probably have the best 3rd and 4th lines in the NHL. This seems to leave the 1st and 2nd lines more exposed though.
Look at it this way, the Sharks finally have a 40 points player as a result of the last game. That is Brent Burns, a defender.
This seems to be the Las Vegas strategy as they don't have a 40+ points player, and neither does Nashville. But teams that roll their strength in the 1st and 2nd lines, and play their 3rd and 4th strategy differently, are in first place across the divisions.
I don't think Jones, Dell, or Vlasic is this bad. What is bad is Pete Deboer. He's funged up a very good team with his weird coaching crap.
Vlasic is -16 while Burns is +4, who would have ever predicted that at the start of the season? I know I wouldn't.
Look at it this way, the Sharks finally have a 40 points player as a result of the last game. That is Brent Burns, a defender.
This seems to be the Las Vegas strategy as they don't have a 40+ points player, and neither does Nashville. But teams that roll their strength in the 1st and 2nd lines, and play their 3rd and 4th strategy differently, are in first place across the divisions.
I don't think Jones, Dell, or Vlasic is this bad. What is bad is Pete Deboer. He's funged up a very good team with his weird coaching crap.
Vlasic is -16 while Burns is +4, who would have ever predicted that at the start of the season? I know I wouldn't.