Toggle sidebar

Post-Game Talk: PATROITS at NY Jets - It was an ugly win - Pats 30 NYJ 27 F

DangleCity

DangleCity

Registered User
Jun 23, 2016
7,174
3,363
Smitty93 said:
You know, I've been rooting for them to lose games to get the best draft pick possible in order to draft a QB, but I don't want to see them get embarrassed and this is basically that. The Jets don't even average 12 points a game and they're about to score 20 in the 1st half with Joe f***ing Flacco.
Click to expand...
Lol, posted it earlier, but the people calling for the tank are without a doubt are under 30 and have never experienced a really bad losing season. It flat out sucks and is hard to watch.

Even after a tanking season there is also no guarantee you get number 1 overall
 

Johnnyduke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
22,706
6,632
Troublesome 85 said:
This is god damn pathetic

0-8 Jets spanking this team. Stupid penalties. Letting 60 year old Flacco throw multiple TDs. 50 year old Gore smashing them.

This PBP guy is a moron. WHY would the Jets want Lawrence?
Click to expand...

Huh? Why wouldn't they? Gonna have to turn on Zolak for this 2nd half.
 
Troublesome 85

Troublesome 85

Proud Girl Dad
Dec 28, 2017
9,744
7,408
Sarasota/Bradenton
Also the NFL media is loving the Patriots sucking. They hated them when they were winning and dominant and barely said a good word. Now the Patriots suck and they can all be happy and glow about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mione134
Mione134

Mione134

Queen in the North
Sponsor
Mar 30, 2010
36,307
38,976
Hogwarts-617
The Jets kept up with KC for a long while, and they lost to the Bills 10-18. So perspective here is key.
 

Johnnyduke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
22,706
6,632
DangleCity said:
Lol, posted it earlier, but the people calling for the tank are without a doubt are under 30 and have never experienced a really bad losing season. It flat out sucks and is hard to watch.

Even after a tanking season there is also no guarantee you get number 1 overall
Click to expand...

I am 36 and absolutely remember Pats home games not even being on TV because they didn't sell out. At this point there is no reason to NOT root for the tank. Cam Newton is not the answer going forward. Obviously there's no guarantee but having Lawrence or Fields etc is much more appealing than not having them at this point.
 
Smitty93

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,206
9,368
DangleCity said:
Lol, posted it earlier, but the people calling for the tank are without a doubt are under 30 and have never experienced a really bad losing season. It flat out sucks and is hard to watch.

Even after a tanking season there is also no guarantee you get number 1 overall
Click to expand...

The only thing that would suck would be losing for nothing. They'll probably find a way to win enough games to miss out on the top QBs. Personally, I'd be fine with any of Lawrence, Fields, or Lance, so I don't really care about getting the 1st overall pick. Just need to be high enough to pick one of the top guys.
 
DangleCity

DangleCity

Registered User
Jun 23, 2016
7,174
3,363
Johnnyduke said:
I am 36 and absolutely remember Pats home games not even being on TV because they didn't sell out. At this point there is no reason to NOT root for the tank. Cam Newton is not the answer going forward. Obviously there's no guarantee but having Lawrence or Fields etc is much more appealing than not having them at this point.
Click to expand...
No one is saying Cam is the anwser. But their have beem some good QBs drafted mid-to late first that have panned out. Drafting a top 5ish QB has been really hit or miss recently
 

DueDiligence

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
8,502
4,867
Troublesome 85 said:
Also the NFL media is loving the Patriots sucking. They hated them when they were winning and dominant and barely said a good word. Now the Patriots suck and they can all be happy and glow about it.
Click to expand...
Well there are plenty of reasons why. No need to list them here but the media and rival fans have waited years to dump on them.
 
DangleCity

DangleCity

Registered User
Jun 23, 2016
7,174
3,363
Smitty93 said:
The only thing that would suck would be losing for nothing. They'll probably find a way to win enough games to miss out on the top QBs. Personally, I'd be fine with any of Lawrence, Fields, or Lance, so I don't really care about getting the 1st overall pick. Just need to be high enough to pick one of the top guys.
Click to expand...
Lawrence shouldnt even be mentioned in the same category as Fields or Lance. Whoever gets #1 is taking him and not trading the pick. He is a once a decade type QB. Patriots fans need to stop acting like they have a chance at him.
 

Johnnyduke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
22,706
6,632
OK but if you're telling me to choose between the Patriots sucking and getting a mid round pick or the Patriots sucking and getting a top pick I will take the top pick option. I have no interest in seeing them win a few games and finishing 5-11 or 6-10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smitty93

Johnnyduke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
22,706
6,632
DangleCity said:
Lawrence shouldnt even be mentioned in the same category as Fields or Lance. Whoever gets #1 is taking him and not trading the pick. He is a once a decade type QB. Patriots fans need to stop acting like they have a chance at him.
Click to expand...

Dude, the Patriots are down 10 to the Jets. If you lose to the Jets you can lose every remaining game on your schedule.
 
bwdrums1

bwdrums1

Registered User
Dec 14, 2017
1,708
1,537
Just for sh*** I checked the league YAC stats, I was pretty sure they would have been bottom 5. They are actually 23rd in the league, so I guess that's bottom 9 ? Anyway, just a little bit better than I had thought, but not much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom