Confirmed with Link: Patrik Nemeth signed

Fil Larkmanthanasiou

Registered User
Feb 10, 2018
1,114
603
I dont love Dekeyser by any means but hes definitely a guy who is play above his ability. He shouldnt be a top pairing guy on any team but if the wings had a couple top pairing D and he was on the second pair I think he would be fine. Instead hes forced to play some PP mins and do things hes not really able to do well so we dont like him.
Lol. 14 seconds of PP time per game
 

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
9,715
3,511
T I think DD was good at overtime, because a lot of ice and he can skate. His hockey iq not so good and it is harder for him when 5 on 5 ,
 
  • Like
Reactions: hkydave04

newfy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2010
14,754
8,305
Lol. 14 seconds of PP time per game

Last year sure. A couple years before that he was playing 34 seconds a game. With injuries he ended up playing a regular spot on the PP at times the last couple of years. He has no business being near a PP. If he had the proper guys ahead of him to knock him into what his role should actually be he would look solid enough I think. He definitelyisnt garbage or terrible like some are implying here. If he was on a team like Nashville who had Josi, Ekholm and Ellis ahead of him and he just logged big PK minutes and played second pair, peoples opinions of him would be different
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,860
10,396
Why the defence of Dekeyser from so many? Even if he was paid 2.5 per season, he doesn't really do anything well. No offence, no physicality, not good a moving the puck, he is as bad as Ericsson at getting the puck out of our zone, with lazy lobs and passes. Doesn't defend the goalie or stand up for teammates. I am legit not sure what makes him anymore than a 5-6 guy at absolute best. He skates decently for a big guy and has decent reach, that is about it for his skills, and what good are those when he is so average-below average at everything else, and is paid about 2-2.5 times what he should be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hkydave04

Mlotek

Registered User
Feb 28, 2017
921
346
South of US Border
Why the defence of Dekeyser from so many? Even if he was paid 2.5 per season, he doesn't really do anything well. No offence, no physicality, not good a moving the puck, he is as bad as Ericsson at getting the puck out of our zone, with lazy lobs and passes. Doesn't defend the goalie or stand up for teammates. I am legit not sure what makes him anymore than a 5-6 guy at absolute best. He skates decently for a big guy and has decent reach, that is about it for his skills, and what good are those when he is so average-below average at everything else, and is paid about 2-2.5 times what he should be?
He used to have good defensive positioning when he first broke with the team. Since than its been downhill.

The reason he got paid so much is because he's from Michigan.

You know, Holland and that Michigan fetish.

Same reason why Miller was kept on the team for so long, and why Eaves was the one jettisonned for whatever 3rd line center Holland got from Nashville.
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,147
1,574
I didn't expect Yzerman to do an immediate turn around of the team so I am okay with signings like Patrik Nemeth to a 2-year contract even if he's a bit overpaid.

The thing that makes me nervous is the possibility that signings like stick around forever and get slotted into roles that are over the player's head and block prospects from getting NHL development. That is coming directly from my Holland hangover. I wasn't feeling that way until Yzerman signed Filpulla, but that singing just flooded me with dread. I hope the organization has moved away from the country club that Holland ran and this is truly a short term stay or, if it's a long term stay, he is played the level of depth he is suited for and moved out of the way when someone better is developed.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,128
12,124
Tampere, Finland
Why the defence of Dekeyser from so many?

Last season 5-on-5:
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative Corsi (behind Hronek)
- Best defenceman in Relative GF%
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative xG% (behind Jensen)
- Most starts from Defensive Zone
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative HDCF% (behind Jensen)
- Toughest quality of Competition

So, basicly best 5-on-5 defenceman on the team overall when you combine everything together. Tough to find a stat where he does poorly.

We have many bad defencemen. DeKeyser isn't one of them. Everything would look much much worse without him.
 

obey86

Registered User
Jun 9, 2009
8,013
1,274
Why the defence of Dekeyser from so many? Even if he was paid 2.5 per season, he doesn't really do anything well. No offence, no physicality, not good a moving the puck, he is as bad as Ericsson at getting the puck out of our zone, with lazy lobs and passes. Doesn't defend the goalie or stand up for teammates. I am legit not sure what makes him anymore than a 5-6 guy at absolute best. He skates decently for a big guy and has decent reach, that is about it for his skills, and what good are those when he is so average-below average at everything else, and is paid about 2-2.5 times what he should be?

Agreed. He's bottom pair, replacement level garbage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hkydave04

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,860
10,396
Last season 5-on-5:
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative Corsi (behind Hronek)
- Best defenceman in Relative GF%
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative xG% (behind Jensen)
- Most starts from Defensive Zone
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative HDCF% (behind Jensen)
- Toughest quality of Competition

So, basicly best 5-on-5 defenceman on the team overall when you combine everything together. Tough to find a stat where he does poorly.

We have many bad defencemen. DeKeyser isn't one of them. Everything would look much much worse without him.

You defend him by mentioning he is the best of a very bad bunch and a rookie(s)? There are many teams he wouldn't even be more than a 5-6 guy and some he wouldn't even make the cut. And yet here he sits making $5 million per year.
 

Winger98

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
22,791
4,633
Cleveland
He used to have good defensive positioning when he first broke with the team. Since than its been downhill.

The reason he got paid so much is because he's from Michigan.

You know, Holland and that Michigan fetish.

Same reason why Miller was kept on the team for so long, and why Eaves was the one jettisonned for whatever 3rd line center Holland got from Nashville.

The team around him was also a lot better. The guy didn't progress as any of us hoped, but he's also not as bad as folks are making out. Slot him in as the third or fourth D on this team, with the guys ahead of him clearly better and handling minutes according to that, and Dekeyser looks a lot better.

And I think Eaves was moved because he couldn't stay healthy.In the five seasons after he left Detroit, he played over 60 games just once.
 

obey86

Registered User
Jun 9, 2009
8,013
1,274
The team around him was also a lot better. The guy didn't progress as any of us hoped, but he's also not as bad as folks are making out. Slot him in as the third or fourth D on this team, with the guys ahead of him clearly better and handling minutes according to that, and Dekeyser looks a lot better.

And I think Eaves was moved because he couldn't stay healthy.In the five seasons after he left Detroit, he played over 60 games just once.

Yeah, lots of valid moves to be concerned about, trading Patrick Eaves isn't one of them.
 

hkydave04

Registered User
Mar 8, 2016
52
31
Last season 5-on-5:
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative Corsi (behind Hronek)
- Best defenceman in Relative GF%
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative xG% (behind Jensen)
- Most starts from Defensive Zone
- 2nd best defenceman in Relative HDCF% (behind Jensen)
- Toughest quality of Competition

So, basicly best 5-on-5 defenceman on the team overall when you combine everything together. Tough to find a stat where he does poorly.

We have many bad defencemen. DeKeyser isn't one of them. Everything would look much much worse without him.
You're comparing him to other players on a bottom 5 team. Just cuz he's good on our team doesn't make DD good! I don't think he does anything well, like a poster stated earlier,,but skate well. Shit, Dorothy Hamill skates well...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oddbob

hkydave04

Registered User
Mar 8, 2016
52
31
Why the defence of Dekeyser from so many? Even if he was paid 2.5 per season, he doesn't really do anything well. No offence, no physicality, not good a moving the puck, he is as bad as Ericsson at getting the puck out of our zone, with lazy lobs and passes. Doesn't defend the goalie or stand up for teammates. I am legit not sure what makes him anymore than a 5-6 guy at absolute best. He skates decently for a big guy and has decent reach, that is about it for his skills, and what good are those when he is so average-below average at everything else, and is paid about 2-2.5 times what he should be?
Agreed 100%%
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,128
12,124
Tampere, Finland
You defend him by mentioning he is the best of a very bad bunch and a rookie(s)? There are many teams he wouldn't even be more than a 5-6 guy and some he wouldn't even make the cut. And yet here he sits making $5 million per year.

DeKeyser is the only defenceman on this team who has better 5-on-5 GF/60 than GA/60 from last 2 seasons combined. By far.

He must be doing something good that bashers aren't able to see.

Guy is Defending = preventing goals. When he is on the ice, less goals happen against our goal than against opposite goal. On a bad team, this is more of IMPRESSIVE, than looking bad.

And guy plays against toughest opponents. It's nothing like some statistical fluke, when some guy gets easy matchups + offensive end faceoffs, to ride for nice looking stats. These stats are great and against wind.

You can feel free to say that he LOOKS bad. He can look like anything and be effective. That's what matters. Are you effective or not.
 
Last edited:

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,219
14,930
crease
Disagree 100%.

You can't triple stamp a double stamp!

jZj2tkM.gif
 

avssuc

Hockey is for everyone!
May 1, 2016
988
340
Gulf Coast
I think it depends on the team. I remember people used to say the same thing about Nyquist and how he would NEVER be a top 6 forward on a playoff team, then sure enough he goes to the Sharks and plays in a top 6 role. I think with the right partner on the right team he could be a top 4 guy.

Wasn't the promotion due to attrition based necessity?

I have to disagree. Gus was, at least, willing to high stick dudes in the face along the boards. DeKeyser won't even gently ask guys to move out of the crease... because guys the size of Nyquist can easily destroy him.
 

avssuc

Hockey is for everyone!
May 1, 2016
988
340
Gulf Coast
Dekeyser and Green are probably a better pair than anything the Pens could put together when they won their most recent Cup.

The Capitals had to send Green packing to win a cup. Letang by himself is better than those two put together. I'd take Matta or Schultz over DeKeyser.
 

obey86

Registered User
Jun 9, 2009
8,013
1,274
Wasn't the promotion due to attrition based necessity?

I have to disagree. Gus was, at least, willing to high stick dudes in the face along the boards. DeKeyser won't even gently ask guys to move out of the crease... because guys the size of Nyquist can easily destroy him.

I don't think so. He was immediately slotted onto one of their top 2 lines once acquired IIRC.

Teams rarely put all their best players on line 1, their 2nd best players on line 2, etc. The wealth is typically spread out over multiple lines, so Nyqvist caliber players routinely play in the top 6 across the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kliq and Winger98

kliq

Registered User
Dec 17, 2017
2,727
1,319
Wasn't the promotion due to attrition based necessity?

I have to disagree. Gus was, at least, willing to high stick dudes in the face along the boards. DeKeyser won't even gently ask guys to move out of the crease... because guys the size of Nyquist can easily destroy him.

Well, that’s why with DD who you pair him with is so important.

Regarding Nquist, I’m not sure. But I remember reading over and over again how he wouldn’t sniff the top 6 on a contender.
 

kliq

Registered User
Dec 17, 2017
2,727
1,319
The Capitals had to send Green packing to win a cup. Letang by himself is better than those two put together. I'd take Matta or Schultz over DeKeyser.

Schultz is an interesting one. Like DD, the fan base in Edmonton turned on him, but in Pittsburgh he appears to fitting in just great.
 

obey86

Registered User
Jun 9, 2009
8,013
1,274
Well, that’s why with DD who you pair him with is so important.

Regarding Nquist, I’m not sure. But I remember reading over and over again how he wouldn’t sniff the top 6 on a contender.

People say the same thing now with Mantha, AA, Bertuzzi. They may not be the best player/line driver on a top 6 line for a contender, but they can definitely play in the top 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kliq

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,243
7,583
Bellingham, WA
The Capitals had to send Green packing to win a cup. Letang by himself is better than those two put together. I'd take Matta or Schultz over DeKeyser.
Letang didn't play the last time the Penguins won the Cup. He was injured, Trevor Daley played 21 games in the playoffs. Schultz was the only D who put up any offense.

Offensively, Green is better than that D (with Letang out). Defensively, he falls apart in the playoffs when things get physical because he has no idea how to avoid a check.

Green got bumped down to third pair by Carlson (drafted) and Niskanen (UFA). Green is too expensive to have around as third pair, so the Caps let him go.

But in any case, the 2017 Stanley Cup Pens' D wasn't that great.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->