RightKinger
Registered User
Two small guys with loads of offensive talent.
Similarities? Differences? Potential? etc.
Similarities? Differences? Potential? etc.
Patrick Kane is a better player in nearly every single category.
Well, Kane is not stronger or more able to play a well-rounded game. Yet. Although I'm thinking he won't ever be either, age differences aside. I'd take Little over him for the NHL. I'd sign Chris Drury as a free agent before I'd sign Daniel Briere too, as an illustration.Patrick Kane is a better player in nearly every single category.
Well, Kane is not stronger or more able to play a well-rounded game. Yet. Although I'm thinking he won't ever be either, age differences aside. I'd take Little over him for the NHL. I'd sign Chris Drury as a free agent before I'd sign Daniel Briere too, as an illustration.
Isn't Bryan Little the better two-way player. He's also much tougher, right? Kane's more like a Hejduk and Little is more like a Langkow, I think. I've never seen either player, and I'm just going off of what I've read, so I could be way off.
You sure come up with a good reason. I'm sure you helped a lot of people lol.Pat Kane has way more potential then Littlle. It's as simple as that.
You sure come up with a good reason. I'm sure you helped a lot of people lol.
You can't really come up with a reason for a guy having more potential. He just has more raw talent, thus having more potential.
I don't think anybody would dispute that. I also think approximately 99.999% of anybody surveyed would take Kane. I'll be happy in my own little .001% of the world who takes Little. Crossing my fingers that the lax atmosphere of the OHL this year hasn't robbed him of the fire he'll need to make that Drury=Little vs. Briere=Kane comparison stick. It's a worry, I admit. But I'd still take Drury over Briere.Pat Kane has way more potential then Littlle. It's as simple as that.