Ok, that I agree with. He’s not playing up to his standard, which is why I think he must be hurt.
His shutting Tavares down is an undersold story in this series. JT had 47 goals this year and just an empty netter through 5 games so far.Careful..... Injuries are nothing more than excuses.
I think he's injured. That plus going up against Tavares (who is a stud and one of the best centers in the game) is not easy.
Someone mentioned Bergeron taking a shot off his foot before the playoffs. That sounds like exactly what’s ailing him because his skating right now isn’t good. But yeah, Tavares has been quiet so far which is good.Careful..... Injuries are nothing more than excuses.
I think he's injured. That plus going up against Tavares (who is a stud and one of the best centers in the game) is not easy.
His shutting Tavares down is an undersold story in this series. JT had 47 goals this year and just an empty netter through 5 games so far.
Not shutting down Tavares would create an even greater need for offensive firepowerThe issue is that the team lacks offensive firepower
Shutting down Tavares wont be enough
I hope he will be to old next game to make your point. Is it ok GoB’sBergeron is getting too old for playoff hockey with no replacement in sight
Hey mod is this ok?
lol.4 man 2nd line consisting of a player we don't have probably won't work.
IMO he looked renewed in games 6 and 7. Locked down Tavares and got some offensive zone time going.Hopefully Bergeron will start playing better soon. We're going to need it.
IMO he looked renewed in games 6 and 7. Locked down Tavares and got some offensive zone time going.
I suspect at least him and pasta are two of the "dinged up" guys Sweeney was talking about. Hope he is getting better, no rest coming up any time soonIMO he looked renewed in games 6 and 7. Locked down Tavares and got some offensive zone time going.
He was playing almost purely defense by the end. At one point in g7 they had 9 faceoffs and 8 were dzone.He's still not looking "dangerous" to me, nor has he been shooting well. He had one good look last night, but his shot was somehow blocked. That was his series in a nutshell (from an offensive perspective).
He's still not looking "dangerous" to me, nor has he been shooting well. He had one good look last night, but his shot was somehow blocked. That was his series in a nutshell (from an offensive perspective).
That was definitely a rough one, although he did look better in the first OT. I think he's been "fine" for the most part when it comes to defense even if he's not chipping in offensively, but tonight was a rough one overall. Everyone is always quick to say injury, but I'm not sure what it would be. Maybe he looks a little bit slower? Whatever it is, it's not something that has affected his faceoffs at all.
I hope/expect that penalty will piss him off in a good way.
I disagree. He looks tired but played a good game, not stellar but good.That was definitely a rough one, although he did look better in the first OT. I think he's been "fine" for the most part when it comes to defense even if he's not chipping in offensively, but tonight was a rough one overall. Everyone is always quick to say injury, but I'm not sure what it would be. Maybe he looks a little bit slower? Whatever it is, it's not something that has affected his faceoffs at all.
I hope/expect that penalty will piss him off in a good way.
huh?
He was fine tonight...and those shots in OT should have gone in, especially the 2nd one if Bob wasn't channeling his inner Timmy Thomas
the game winning PP goal penalty sukks....but no way you can pin that on him.
Patrice will make that one up
The game ebbs and flows and it’s rare you can pin a loss on any one player.
But let’s call a spade a spade. That was a terribly stupid penalty. He had no angle on the guy and the only thing he was going to get by reaching his stick in there was the guy’s feet. He only missed the puck by about four feet.
It’s up there with that “high sticking” penalty against MTL (or was it Tampa?) from behind the net back in 2011 (which may not have actually been a penalty) in terms of “why” factor.
I would pin the issue on Coyle dummy turnover before I do on Bergeron penalty
both weren't smart
This is all perception, and no research, but I swear that goals result directly from turnovers 20x as much in the playoffs. You can have carefully played, and somewhat uneventful, games entirely determined by goals scored following turnovers. I swear. It truly is unbelievable when you get the idea in your head and start to tally how many goals are scored directly following egregious mistakes.