Common sense and eye test tell me way too many goals are going in from non prime scoring areas. I don’t need stats to tell me that. That’s literally what’s happening every night on the ice. It doesn’t happen with this much frequency in all the other games I watch. And I watch a ton.My argument is that the way stats are recorded for goalies (and other things too) isn’t accurate enough to pass judgment like you (and many others) do. It’s just not scientific, it’s a feel good thing that becomes impressive because people now have “averages” and “standard deviations” and “confidence intervals” to deal with.
But the statistical measures that sound good to people are only as good as the raw data going in. And what my common sense and eye test tells me is that Bob hasn’t been as bad as the numbers imply. I deal with enough statistics to state that with some confidence.
You can make any claims you want - I’m not impressed by your (or your links) analysis. What’s next, you’re gonna call this “settled science” because enough people say so?