Panarin vs Stone

[Kshahdoo]

Which of these two would you like to get for your favorite team?

Click to read more...

 

[TomasHertlsRooster]

Panarin is the better player but at this point I’d rather get Stone due to various other factors.

 

[Foppberg]

The loaf

 

[BowDownToVasilevskiy]

Panarin

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Panarin. When the checking gets tighter and goals dry up in the playoffs, you take the guy who can manufacture offense like few others

 

[bert]

Stone for me, the difference in offence compared to the defensive and posession game he brings makes him the better player. He makes guys better around him in all ways and is elite in all scenarios. He loves to score and he brings an incredible work eithic to the game.

 

[Machinehead]

Both

 

[Flair Hay]

Depends if your team needs a two way guy or a flashy finisher. Both are awesome playmakers.

 

[JaegerDice]

Stone.

Over the past 3 seasons:

5v5, Stone has 106 points over 186 games for 0.57 PPG 5v5.
All Sit, Stone has 171 points over 186 games for 0.92 PPG.

5v5, Panarin has 140 points over 218 games for 0.64 PPG 5v5
All Sit Panarin has 223 points over 218 games for 1.02 PPG 5v5

So you're basically losing 0.07 PPG 5v5 and 0.10 PPG overall for a guy that is far better defensively, has had tougher deployment on a worse team, and could very likely cost you less AAV.

You are losing all of 6 points 5v5 per season and 8 points total per season for a much more versatile and potentially cheaper player.

Easy choice.

 

[CallMeShaft]

Bread, if for no other reason than he's gonna age a lot better than Stone. But that's what happens when you play that type of style and don't make the NHL until your mid twenties.

 

[Bounces R Way]

Artemi is the markedly better player, so I'll go with him.

 

[34]

Panarin

 

[Regal]

Bread, if for no other reason than he's gonna age a lot better than Stone. But that's what happens when you play that type of style and don't make the NHL until your mid twenties.

This is what I'd be worried about with Stone as well. Not that he's old, but if he's not a great skater in his mid 20s, I'd worry about where he'd be if he lost a step in his early 30s.

 

[BrettHullsToe]

If my favorite team was Florida, I'd take Panarin. Since it's not, I take the guy who might actually re-sign with them.

 

[Ctrain2k]

Stone.

Over the past 3 seasons:

5v5, Stone has 106 points over 186 games for 0.57 PPG 5v5.
All Sit, Stone has 171 points over 186 games for 0.92 PPG.

5v5, Panarin has 140 points over 218 games for 0.64 PPG 5v5
All Sit Panarin has 223 points over 218 games for 1.02 PPG 5v5

So you're basically losing 0.07 PPG 5v5 and 0.10 PPG overall for a guy that is far better defensively, has had tougher deployment on a worse team, and could very likely cost you less AAV.

You are losing all of 6 points 5v5 per season and 8 points total per season for a much more versatile and potentially cheaper player.

Easy choice.

That’s kinda irrelevant, neither of these guys were near the same player 3 years ago that they are today.

 

[Trap Jesus]

They're probably my two favorite wingers in the league, would be happy with either one on Boston. I think Panarin would be the more interesting fit on the Bruins though.

 

[sufferer]

Both

#rag$

Stone for the Sabres. We need an elite two-way player to replace O'Reilly.

 

[Aladyyn]

Flip a coin

 

[QJL]

This is really close. I think it actually comes down to the rest of your roster. If you need a dynamic offensive player, Panarin. If you need an everything guy with a little less offense, Stone. For the Rangers, I’d take Panarin.

 

[bolt thrower]

For the Bruins I take Stone but would never say no to Panarin.

 

[HockeyDBspecialist]

There are so many negative factors affecting Panarin,

Stone is the better one because of that, talent wise it's Panarin and not even close.

 

[780il]

Panarin wouldnt sign in Edmonton so I took Stone.

But, if Panarin would sign here he's my choice.

 

[Morgs]

Panarin has a crazy high defensive impact as well...? They're both extremely well-rounded players.

I went Panarin because I think he'd fit better on the Leafs as he plays LW.

Panarin - Matthews - Nylander
Johnsson - Tavares - Marner

Lol.

 

[McKappa]

Stone pretty easily

 

[Machinehead]

#rag$

Stone for the Sabres. We need an elite two-way player to replace O'Reilly.

The "#Rag$" will be targeting neither.