Proposal: Palmieri to Pittsburgh

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,555
21,097
Interested in exploring different trade scenarios for Palms if NJ continues to struggle.

Zucker for Palmieri
Kapanen for Palmieri
McCann and Poulin for Palmieri
Poulin and 2022 1st for Palmieri and 2022 2nd

Depending on whether NJ wants to weight things more heavily towards youth, futures, or cost certainty.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,474
18,634
Zucker for Palmieri makes sense in a vacuum as a 1:1 swap but Zucker is signed for 3yrs and Pams will be a UFA at seasons end. We gave up a lot for Zucker so I'm not sure dumping that for a UFA is the smartest thing unless there was something else coming back.

That said, NJ has some decent young guys that could even the value. Maltsev, Foote, Boqvist, Merkley...
 

Puckclektr

Registered User
Jul 15, 2004
6,241
2,193
GTA
Jersey passes on all of those. Quite easily. What do any of those do to benefit the Devils?
 

hoyster

Registered User
Dec 1, 2011
1,345
322
Helsinki
Interested in exploring different trade scenarios for Palms if NJ continues to struggle.

Zucker for Palmieri
Kapanen for Palmieri
McCann and Poulin for Palmieri
Poulin and 2022 1st for Palmieri and 2022 2nd

Depending on whether NJ wants to weight things more heavily towards youth, futures, or cost certainty.
Maybe
I wouldn't
No
Absolutely no

My thoughts off the top of my head. Pens can't afford to trade their top prospect and their 2022 1st (which could even be a lottery pick) for a rental like Palmieri. I know they want to win now, but they have to think about the future at least a little.
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,240
11,818
California
Jersey passes on all of those. Quite easily. What do any of those do to benefit the Devils?
A top prospect and a first in a good draft for the last one. A top prospect and a good young C for the third one. A replacement younger top 6 winger in the second. A similar winger signed beyond next season in the first. All of these for someone who may or may not resign.
 

Puckclektr

Registered User
Jul 15, 2004
6,241
2,193
GTA
A top prospect and a first in a good draft for the last one. A top prospect and a good young C for the third one. A replacement younger top 6 winger in the second. A similar winger signed beyond next season in the first. All of these for someone who may or may not resign.
Are we really getting a first when we are giving up our second. Or are we just moving up in the draft? I would rather try to re-rign Palmeiri at a time where players are getting paid considerably less due to Covid then get another young forward. We have plenty of young forwards and I would rather have a proven one at a reasonable cost.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
If NJ moves Palmieri it's likely only after they fall out of the playoff race. He's just gotten his game back together after a tough start and I imagine that NJ wants to see how things go from here before making any decisions on Palmieri.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD

hidek91

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
1,811
1,459
Warsaw, PL
Interested in exploring different trade scenarios for Palms if NJ continues to struggle.

Zucker for Palmieri
Kapanen for Palmieri
McCann and Poulin for Palmieri
Poulin and 2022 1st for Palmieri and 2022 2nd

Depending on whether NJ wants to weight things more heavily towards youth, futures, or cost certainty.

As a Devils fan, I don't think that Zucker/Kapanen fit our timeline that much better than Palmieri, I'd actually like to bet on a Pens' 1st in 2022 but wouldn't give up 2nd in that deal.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,474
18,634
As a Devils fan, I don't think that Zucker/Kapanen fit our timeline that much better than Palmieri, I'd actually like to bet on a Pens' 1st in 2022 but wouldn't give up 2nd in that deal.

Given the age of your best players, how does a 30yo Palmieri fit better than a 24yo Kapanen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamurai

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
78,798
86,142
Nova Scotia
As a Devils fan, I don't think that Zucker/Kapanen fit our timeline that much better than Palmieri, I'd actually like to bet on a Pens' 1st in 2022 but wouldn't give up 2nd in that deal.
KK is 24 years old, Palms is 30. How is he not a fit for NJ timeline?

KK signed for 1 more years...then you sign him to a 5 year deal for his 26-30 year old seasons. So you would have him for 6ish years.

He would be a "vet" for the "now" kids in a few years. the last 2+ years(160 games) he is on a 45 pt pace/82 games. Nothing crazy...but very good depth. And his speed fits perfectly with ow NJ plays.
 

hidek91

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
1,811
1,459
Warsaw, PL
KK is 24 years old, Palms is 30. How is he not a fit for NJ timeline?

KK signed for 1 more years...then you sign him to a 5 year deal for his 26-30 year old seasons. So you would have him for 6ish years.

He would be a "vet" for the "now" kids in a few years. the last 2+ years(160 games) he is on a 45 pt pace/82 games. Nothing crazy...but very good depth. And his speed fits perfectly with ow NJ plays.

As I replied above, the comment was mainly aimed at Zucker but still I believe that e. g. Holtz and Mercer fit our timeline better than Kapanen does. Also, Kapanen produced very well playing with elite centers, same as Johnsson did. And we got Johnsson for a B prospect.

Meanwhile, Palmieri has produced very well, no matter who he played with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HBK27 and Tripod

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
78,798
86,142
Nova Scotia
As I replied above, the comment was mainly aimed at Zucker but still I believe that e. g. Holtz and Mercer fit our timeline better than Kapanen does. Also, Kapanen produced very well playing with elite centers, same as Johnsson did. And we got Johnsson for a B prospect.

Meanwhile, Palmieri has produced very well, no matter who he played with.
Gotcha.

Palms is one of those guys who has been underrated thru the years. Always seems to score against us...lol. He picked up right where Elias left off.
 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
7,790
6,251
Zucker for Palmieri makes sense in a vacuum as a 1:1 swap but Zucker is signed for 3yrs and Pams will be a UFA at seasons end. We gave up a lot for Zucker so I'm not sure dumping that for a UFA is the smartest thing unless there was something else coming back.

That said, NJ has some decent young guys that could even the value. Maltsev, Foote, Boqvist, Merkley...
I doubt NJ would have interest in Zucker in a one for one swap. Much less, if you ask for a prospect on top of it.
 

Strakanator

Registered User
Sep 21, 2007
276
222
Does anyone understand what the word strategy means?

3 year remaining cup window means you don’t care about any futures in those 3 years. Pens need all NHL ready players for 3 years.

This is it for the Penguins. Last cup window for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicksDigTheTrap

Boondock

Registered User
Feb 6, 2009
5,778
2,387
Overpayments everywhere, other than maybe Zucker.
Zucker is 29 and is a 20 goal, 40pt player getting paid $5.5 for 3 seasons. Palmieri makes under $5, has averaged over 25 goals a year and 50+ pts over the past 4-5 seasons. KP plays on the PP and the PK. Palmieri is the better player by a margin. Yes KP will need a contract after this year, but that Zucker cap hit is not good, I wouldn't want it in exchange for KP. The devils are better off getting a 1st than be saddled with the Zucker contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JUSTGIROUXIT

Habs10025

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,606
969
Interested in exploring different trade scenarios for Palms if NJ continues to struggle.

Zucker for Palmieri
Kapanen for Palmieri
McCann and Poulin for Palmieri
Poulin and 2022 1st for Palmieri and 2022 2nd

Depending on whether NJ wants to weight things more heavily towards youth, futures, or cost certainty.
Pittsburgh aren't trading players with term like Kapanen , McCann , Zuker or their 1st rd pick , 2nd rd pick or their best prospect Poulin for Palmieri who's unrestricted after this season.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad