I don't see why people are happy with that. MPS scored 8 goals and 4 assists in 79 games last year. I mean, Burrows had 6 goals and 8 assists in 71 goals and was constantly trashed.
If the plan is to somehow replace Burrows by Paajarvi in the salary structure, then yes it makes sense. If not, the only thing it does is block a young guy like Paul or Chlapik
However there's an upside because of Paajarvi "untapped" potential. He has a nice combination of size and speed so who knows? Maybe he "puts it together" and gets over 30 pts... Other than that, I dunno, he's not that great defensively. He's fine but he's no RickCondra that's for sure.
So yeah, I guess the other upside is to get a late pick at the deadline because I hope younger/better guys will eventually play over him.
I have a pretty strong sense that the 2C spot already has Brown pencilled into it, and going into camp it will be his spot to lose.
I also think that Smith will be traded (just to clear the cap space) and Formenton, Chlapik or Batherson will each get a shot for the 3rd LW opening.
Ideally, Gaborik and Burrows are both gone. Not sure how, but it kind of needs to happen.
You mean to reduce the salary expenditure... Unless surprisingly Melnyk decides to spend to the cap all of sudden!
I think it's the perfect timing to trade Smith. He still has value but turned 30 y/o and could be replaced internally by a cheaper quality young player (White? Chlapik?). We got a lot from that 3rd rounder used to draft Smith already. 542 games, 85 goals, 80 assists, 165 pts and an important role in the bottom-6 for years (+ playoffs). All of that while he was pretty cheap
If the plan is to keep Karlsson, eventually try to only have players younger than him (he turned 28 today). So EK would be the benchmark for players age.