reminds me of the old days. How long since the havlat-recchi incident?
Last edited:
You don't get points for takedowns. It's a ***** move to get yourself out of a fight, and a great way to end someone's career. If anything, takedowns should be discouraged.disagree on hartnell-ruu (wash, maybe even ruu winning for the takedown).
carkner-o'donnell should probably be a no-decision, as the fight didnt really happen.
disagree on hartnell-ruu (wash, maybe even ruu winning for the takedown).
carkner-o'donnell should probably be a no-decision, as the fight didnt really happen.
Neil landed some nice shots on Shelley early in that fight, the size disadvantage came into play as it went on though, props to Neil for stepping up and fighting him none the less.
Props to Neil for actually fighting a heavyweight FOR ONCE. ****ing ***** that Neil is.
Those Ottawa announcers are a couple of babies. Potvin is one of the worst in the business.
Wash
Foligno
Hartnell
Carker
Shelley
as my 5 winners
Props to Neil for actually fighting a heavyweight FOR ONCE. ****ing ***** that Neil is.
Those Ottawa announcers are a couple of babies. Potvin is one of the worst in the business.
Ok, you're a homer.Call me a homer, but I disagree. I see it...
Winchester
Foligno
Draw
No contest (Carkner/O'Donnell)
Shelley
Bettman is not going to like this.
If you're going to rip on anyone, it should be at Shelley for turning down Carkner, a man his own size, only to scrap with a middleweight like Neil a few minutes later.
Bettman is not going to like this.
Ok, you're a homer.
Call me a homer, but I disagree. I see it...
Winchester
Foligno
Draw
No contest (Carkner/O'Donnell)
Shelley
Wash
Foligno
Hartnell
Carker
Shelley
as my 5 winners