An organization that demands loyalty but gives none in return. He's respected in Ottawa and it's not like they're going to compete anyway.
Odd statement there, it was pretty much a given that he would be gone after this contract and it just makes sense. Normal to see teams move on from older goalies who don't play well. Re-signing him to have him out of the lineup does not seem like a very good move.
Even if we're not trying to win, it would be idiotic to take some playing time from a guy like Hogberg who vastly outplayed Anderson and will actually have an evolving role in this rebuild just because of "loyalty". This team has been loyal to Anderson ever since he was acquired from Colorado. The team decided to trade a young Robin Lehner and a young Ben Bishop just to keep Anderson as starter. If this is not commitment and loyalty to you I don't have a clue what loyalty means.
That would be like saying the Jets not signing Toby Enstrom was not being loyal.
Anyways this is a knee jerk reaction type comment where everyone just shits on the Sens for everything they do. This time it's not the case, it would be counterproductive to keep Anderson and it really makes no sense at all. Loyalty only goes so far, no team will keep a player if they can't play at the level that they need to. Especially if they would take some playing time off of some younger developing players.