Globalization, mechanization, unions and education have destroyed well-paying manufacturing jobs. There is no reason to pay some guy $60,000 a year to build sprockets here when a robot or guy in China can do it for pennies on the dollar. There's nothing sad about progress when ANYBODY can go to school.
Globalization is an interesting buzz word that economist coined and now everyone has picked up on it.
What we see today, which is a redistribution of wealth (economic definition of wealth) from the developed/advanced countries to those that are
developing.
The ideal that globalization represents--- everyone doing that which they do best or most efficiently and thus having pure competition --- is not what we have in the world today. Sorry to burst your bubble.
China will only have an advantage until it catches up. Back in the 1960's, everything was 'Made in Japan' and many considered it to be of low quality. That disparity didn't last long, although Japan does have far fewer people.
In fact, what you see happening is company's profiting off the gap that exists between advanced and underdeveloped countries. The advanced countries' societies claim they value clean air/water, worker rights and protection, health insurance, food safety, the best medical conditions for those who can pay and/or work, and so forth. These costs are passed on to the companies that operate here. The advanced society's are talking out of both ends because they also want cheap products and unlimited choices. Oh, and cheap energy.
Sorry, but real income in this country is declining. Education has nothing to do with it. I remember 20 yrs ago, the finance and service sectors were going to save our way of life. Until the banks started moving that offshore too.
Point being, we do not have barrier-free flow of people/labor, goods, services or even capital. Especially people. Until and unless that happens, the only thing you're going to see flowing is money, and unfortunately for this country, more of that is in the outward than the inward direction.
"White flight" occurs because nobody wants to live in an area where you have a 50-50 chance of being mugged if you walk around after dark. People try to make it into the classic American racial BS, but it's really economics and common sense. How many black families *want* to live in the ghetto? I've lived in three different areas of downtown Atlanta... there are just some places that don't have any money or stability and wind up full of drug dealers, prostitutes and thugs. Who wants to raise a family there?
White flight started in the 1960's ( and maybe '50's in some areas). I'm old enough to remember the civil unrest of the late 60's and 70's. No one wants to live in depressed areas, but the people who "can" leave, do leave, regardless of skin color. Or are you going to say that minority populations could have moved about freely and had equal access to jobs in the 1960's?
"White flight" = area's economics went into the crapper, crime rises so you move down the street. In Detroit's case "down the street" just kept getting further and further away due to extremely poor city management. Atlanta and Detroit faced the exact same racial issues in the 60s yet moved in polar opposite directions. Why? Detroit's economy withered, Atlanta's flourished. Don't try to pin it on race- rehashing or blindly accepting the idea of "white flight" implies that all white people are racist and all black people are criminals. Just stupid.
I have no idea how you concluded that is my position on the matter. There was a social phenomenon called white flight that has been studiously chronicled in the history annals of this country. You are the only one jumping to that conclusion.
Also, you may wish to revisit when Atlanta and south started rising, economically. Juxtaposed against all that is the Oil embargo, US dollar being moved off the gold standard, increasing international competition for the auto industry (1980's), increasing cost of oil, regulation of all sorts of things (EPA came into being when exactly??), and so on.
This isn't a problem that is explained in a few paragraphs.