Facts about Klefbom.
He has five (5!) career PP goals in spite of being on just about every PP since joining the team. I’m afraid to look up the actual PP minutes.
In 2016/17 he put up 12-26-38. That’s nearly half of his career total goals and a third of his career points.
He is a stonking -35 for his career. Contrast with Larsson who is +26 since coming to Edmonton, Russell who is +1 since coming to Edmonton and Nurse who is -11 (all accumulated this season while trying to carry the entire backend).
Context is important. Playing big minutes for one of the worst teams in the league will do that to you.
In 14/15 Klefbom was -21 in a year where the entire team was minus. Eberle was -16, Nuge -12, Schultz -17, Petry -25, Purcell -33 and Yakupov -35. So there's -21 of those -35. I'm sure it was Klefboms fault that the team was a complete dumpster fire that year.
In 15/16 Klefbom was -4 in 30 games played, while top d man Sekera went -15, Schultz -22 and Nurse -13 with forwards Letestu going -21, Yakupov -16 and Eberle -12.
In 16/17 Klefbom was a plus player and a huge part of a team that almost went to the WCF's. Sekera and Larsson also had great years. Nurse was +/- 0 in sheltered minutes.
In 17/18 Klefbom played through an injury which clearly affected him. So this is really the only year you can criticize him for. Nurse had a good year and was +15.
In 18/19 Klefbom has been the best Oilers D by a country mile. Larsson has been really inconsistent if not outright poor since Klefbom went down. And Nurse has drowned (-11) trying to replace Klefbom's minutes. So not sure what you're trying to argue here.
As for the PP, he sucks on it, that's nothing new, and I don't see anyone in here trying to argue the opposite, so why even bring that up? Is there some sort of rule that says you have to be a wizard on the PP to be considered a good player? Isn't strong 5v5 play a hell of a lot more important?