Orr says Crosby is a top-5 player of all time, McDavid has the potential to be the best ever

Dominance

99-66-4-9-87/97
Sep 30, 2017
7,844
12,337
The Land of Hockey
Josh Yohe goes into detail of the interview here:

[URL="https://theathletic.com/1895857/2020/06/30/is-sidney-crosby-one-of-the-best-hockey-players-of-all-time-bobby-orr-says-yes/?source=twittered"]Is Sidney Crosby one of the best hockey players of all time?
[/URL]

For those who aren’t subscribed to the Athletic, there are some sound bites pulled out here:

Orr tabs Crosby as top-5 player in NHL history: 'Sid belongs on that list'

Both Orr and Lemieux have now said Crosby clearly belongs in the top-5 GOAT discussion. I’m sure many on here will have a field day with how the greatest defenceman of all time did not punish Crosby for his injuries, but rather praised him for his perseverance.

Probably more interesting is the comment about McDavid. I think it shows recognition of how the league has changed and become more competitive and more inclined to parity, and therefore a current or future player would not necessarily have to match Gretzky’s statistics and awards to really enter the GOAT discussion. I’m interested if people would agree or disagree with this.
 

67Leafs67

Registered User
Nov 8, 2014
774
631
McDavid has some catching up to do already at age 23 if he's going to best Gretzky. Great offensive talent, and definitely will go down as one of the greats, best of his generation, HHOF lock, etc, will probably match Crosby and potentially surpass. Cracking the top four? Possibly, but I wouldn't bet on it. Ousting Gretzky at No.1? Nah. This is just the typical past generation of players hyping up the current generation.
 

TheOtherOne

Registered User
Jan 2, 2010
8,274
5,270
Hasn't Gretzky been on record saying his neighbors cousins best friend is better than him?
Former players over praising younger players is nothing new
Have you ever seen Gretzky's neighbor's cousin's best friend play? Gretzky's neighbor's cousin's best friend is f***ing electric. If you're building a team for the ages you want to include Gretzky's neighbor's cousin's best friend. Don't underestimate Gretzky's neighbor's cousin's best friend.



[now pretend I know how to photoshop and attached an all-star trading card showing "Gretzky's neighbor's cousin's best friend" on it]
 

nowhereman

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
9,262
7,657
Los Angeles
Calling Crosby a top 5 player of all time is certainly not a stretch, given he's already in the mix with Beliveau, Hull and Richard. There's still some career value yet to be squeezed out of him, since he'll still need the overall career numbers to go along with all his other accomplishments, but I can very much see Sid ending up close to being #5. He's arguably the 4th best forward of all time, if you look at ability/individual dominance and give him the benefit of the doubt with his injuries.

McDavid, on the other hand, will never touch Gretzky. First of all, he'd have to be as talented as Gretzky, which he is most certainly not. Secondly, everything would have to go right for him in his career, which it most certainly won't (I mean, the guy was drafted by Edmonton). The guy isn't even as good as Crosby, who's not close to Gretzky, so this really doesn't add up. I mean, he hasn't won an Art Ross/Hart in years.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,204
138,573
Bojangles Parking Lot
Crosby doesn't need to be as good as Gretzky/Orr/Howe/Lemieux to be in the top-5.

He needs to be better than the next player, which is the Hull/Beliveau/Richard tier.

I'd say that as of right now, he's on a plane with those guys. Assuming he still has some impressive exploits left in store for the latter stages of his career, then it will end up being fully defensible to have him #5 when all is said and done. Especially if you don't spend too much time worrying about inconveniences such as including goalies in the game of hockey.
 

Khelandros

Registered User
Feb 12, 2019
3,981
4,463
Josh Yohe goes into detail of the interview here:
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1981275/amp
Is Sidney Crosby one of the best hockey players of all time?

For those who aren’t subscribed to the Athletic, there are some sound bites pulled out here:

Orr tabs Crosby as top-5 player in NHL history: 'Sid belongs on that list'

Both Orr and Lemieux have now said Crosby clearly belongs in the top-5 GOAT discussion. I’m sure many on here will have a field day with how the greatest defenceman of all time did not punish Crosby for his injuries, but rather praised him for his perseverance.

Probably more interesting is the comment about McDavid. I think it shows recognition of how the league has changed and become more competitive and more inclined to parity, and therefore a current or future player would not necessarily have to match Gretzky’s statistics and awards to really enter the GOAT discussion. I’m interested if people would agree or disagree with this.
One of your points is fact, the other is your opinion. Here is the quote from the actual article:
Orr said. “I think Connor McDavid can be up there with them someday. But Sid is there."
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
47,991
19,715
MN
Crosby needs to continue to be effective for about another 6-8 years, IMO, for him to be top 5. Off the top of my head, Beliveau, Lafleur, Trottier, Perrault were all in Crosby's class as forwards...I'm sure others can chime in with examples. Hell, Ovi is now in his class, with his terrific production as he ages and his Cup win.

I never saw Beliveau in his prime(1950's), so I might be underrating him.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,204
138,573
Bojangles Parking Lot
I never saw Beliveau in his prime(1950's), so I might be underrating him.

One could argue that Beliveau had a more decorated career, in terms of staying healthy and consistently being the best C in the league.

That said, if I were to argue Crosby over Beliveau, I'd start with:

1) Crosby played on a relatively ordinary NHL team, not a completely dominant dynasty that had the league's best defenseman, best goalie, and best goal-scoring winger at the same time. He can be forgiven for not winning 10 Stanley Cups, seeing as very few players from this era can match Crosby's 3.

2) Having 2 Conn Smythes as opposed to 1 is a non-trivial difference.

3) Crosby's numbers hold up against Beliveau's, and they're better on a per-game basis.

4) Beliveau dealt with the odd injury, but nothing nearly as catastrophic as losing entire prime seasons to neurological issues.

5) We're comparing a guy who turns 33 next month to a guy who racked up achievements until age 39, including his final 4 years in an expansion environment that artificially extended careers.

6) The tie should usually go to the more recent player.
 

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
14,748
11,592
Crosby needs to continue to be effective for about another 6-8 years, IMO, for him to be top 5. Off the top of my head, Beliveau, Lafleur, Trottier, Perrault were all in Crosby's class as forwards...I'm sure others can chime in with examples. Hell, Ovi is now in his class, with his terrific production as he ages and his Cup win.

I never saw Beliveau in his prime(1950's), so I might be underrating him.

Ovechkin hasn't hit 90 points since the 09-10 season, despite playing pretty much every game. Let's slow the brakes
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
47,991
19,715
MN
You are forgetting that is was harder to score during most of Beliveau's career. Defence and physicality was a thing during the original six era. He was also a relative giant back then and could physically dominate in a way that Crosby can not.

Losing games to injuries can not be perceived as a positive thing. Durability is an ingredient to the recipe for greatness.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
47,991
19,715
MN
Ovi scores goals at a prolific and consistent rate. That matters, and always has mattered. That's what made Richard and Hull great. Ovi is the closest thing I've seem to Hull.
 

filinski77

Registered User
Feb 12, 2017
2,619
4,296
The McDavid thing is laughable, McDavid is part of Orr Hockey group, so either Orr is:
a) A senile 72 year old man, or
b) Wants to boost and give some confidence to his client (more likely IMO)

The Crosby thing at least has some basis, Crosby is definitely up there for the #5 spot with Jagr/Hasek/Ovi/Hull etc, so it's reasonable for Orr to want to just throw in a Canadian in that spot.

McDavid has a long way to go before he is appointed anything. For all we know, he could never win a scoring title, or goalscoring title, or a cup. Too much potential for things to go wrong. Crosby was probably deemed the next Gretzky after his Ross in his 2nd season, then he only went on to win 1 more the rest of his career. Ovechkin won 3 straight Pearsons, and lead the league in points/gp those same 3 years, and never did after that. Crosby's greatness now has came from great consistency and cups, Ovechkin from his goalscoring.
 

mouz135

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
1,966
2,113
Mcdavid? Best of all time? Laugh.

The Crosby suggestion could be true though
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad