ceber
Registered User
Tom_Benjamin said:Great. Goodenow goes along. Since we are pulling numbers out of our ass, Bob will agree to any cap over $200 million a team.
Tom
Ok, so my little joke at the end prevented you from answering the question. I should've left it off.
Seriously: Assuming the players are fairly paid, what's the problem with limiting the amount a team can spend on salaries as a whole?
Are the players and supporters of that side saying that no players will ever be fairly paid under a cap? On what is that opinion based? Is it a gut reaction?
Are they upset because it will limit where they can play? I think it probably would limit the teams available for a UFA in some cases. But since UFA supply is artificially limited already, I guess I don't see a problem with artificially limiting UFA demand a bit.
Last edited: