Could have avoided problems and allowed Edmonton to prepare to host —- instead, it has been reported that Toronto began preparations early while Edmonton was only informed they would be a host at the last minute and had to scramble, despite being the clear and obvious choice from the beginning
Clear and obvious to some Oilers fans maybe? Every indication is Vegas was under serious consideration for a long time as the western hub.
From a health perspective, In the beginning there were only 2 viable places (Ontario had bad numbers initially)
No. Nevada's numbers weren't that bad in the initial stages.
So they get no credit here IMHO.
That's the exact problem I am pointing out. When the NHL that makes a decision beneficial to the Oilers certain fans will give the league no credit but will howl like a banshee when a different NHL decision doesn't go the Oilers way.
Now, the only way you can say that the Connor McDavid lottery was the league being nice to us is if you are assuming the lottery is a totally illegitimate farce, .
That's a textbook decision of gaslighting. Your claim for my assumption is ridiculous I am saying the league does not play favourites. It didn't play favourites in the McDavid lottery. It didn't play favourites in the points percentage decision for playoff seeding and it didn't play favourites with the Lucic ruling.
We were heavily victimized in the goal reviews, interference and blue line, etc.
Victimized? That's the dramatic language that needs to come to an end.
it is probably a cultural thing —- “everybody knows Edmonton is a safe market, we have to protect nascent franchises whose business situations are precarious,
I don't think anyone in the league believes the Flames need to be protected.