Alberta
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2005
- 1,710
- 18
This is still a weird one to me if he is staying in Sweden.
- I understand signing him to lock in his RFA status, sounds good.
- However, this makes his contract next year non-ELC creating an opportunity for an overpay next year in a non-ELC contract.
- However, this locks him into only negotiating with one team, keeping him affordable (ignoring Chiarelli's tendancy to overpay anyways)
- But then why would the player lock himself into potentially only one team bidding for him for a simple $92K signing bonus?
- But maybe the agent and Chia is super smart thinking that there could be an offersheet anyways if Edmonton doesn't pay allowing for free draft picks for Edmonton and the player just collected a nice signing bonus for nothing and can maximize his value next year (i.e no ELC limit).
- But then the final twist is the Schedule A bonus'. They are unattainable if he's playing in Sweden, so why include them if there is no intent to come over.
All in all, I suspect we haven't heard the full story yet. I'm thinking he's coming for training camp but will have a SHL contract in his back pocket if he doesn't make the team in training camp.
If the Oilers, say, promised a one-way deal coming out of that ELC for 19-20 (and beyond), that would probably be enough to entice Persson to give up the bidding war.
Otherwise, he's putting up way too much risk. If he regresses back to a Swedish Div 1 player, all of a sudden there's no contract coming to him from anyone.