OilerTitanFan
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2019
- 4,614
- 1,317
Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.Now imagine if they had a RH one timer option, or a real shot from the point.
Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.Now imagine if they had a RH one timer option, or a real shot from the point.
Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.
As I said, it does not really change the point of you post, but what am I missing here when it comes to the numbers?
Just edit your post quick and no one will notice!hmmm i just double checked you are right LaGu,sorry must have been old info from NHL.COM
That’s a terrifying thought.Now imagine if they had a RH one timer option, or a real shot from the point.
That’s a terrifying thought.
Thank-You for pointing out the flaw in what i wrote LaGu, i fixed it should be more accurate now.Just edit your post quick and no one will notice!
I mean the point is still the same, a bit closer but we are riding the best PP% since the 70ies, that is pretty cool!
Where does Broberg fit in come the future?Bouchard (RHD) will replace Klefbom up top eventually and he has a hell of a shot, and Yammo will replace one of Neal or Chiasson.
That PP is going to go supernova when this happens as long as someone becomes a net front presence. Yammo is one of the best puck retriever I have seen in a long time.
Where does Broberg fit in come the future?
Valid point!Probably not on the PP, my guess would be because of his skating on the pk to close gaps, and five on five.
Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.
If he unloads 20 shots a game and score one, i have no problems with that.18 G on 323 Shots is still a pretty poor shooting percentage (5.6%). Though I know they report shots a bit different so it'd be a bit higher by our measures.
No doubt sometimes his shot looks leathal, but not often enough.
Note, he's leading the league in shots by about 60 shots, but has the lowest shooting percentage of anyone with more than 9 goals.
According to trade proposals, he fits in as a player to be dumped in any package deals for Rakell.Where does Broberg fit in come the future?
If he unloads 20 shots a game and score one, i have no problems with that.
They count missed shots in liiga.If he's taking 20 shots and only scoring 1, odds are guys with better shooting percentages aren't getting the shots off that could have provided two goals.
My comments are not as a Puljujarvi hater, just trying to give context to his season. I'm happy he's finding success, but I don't see what he has accomplished this year as something that pushes his potential up to that of an elite shooter. I like the volume shooting, but when you are shooting that much, I'm hoping more of them go in or at least create the rebound that eventually goes in. Perhaps his assists are an indicator of that as I don't see him as a skilled playmaker, so here's hoping.
Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.
They count missed shots in liiga.
According to trade proposals, he fits in as a player to be dumped in any package deals for Rakell.
He’s a dead ringer for his countryman Olli Jokinen. Even a similar awkward way about him. Could see a similar career trajectory if put in the right situation. I believe it was Keenan that got Olli turned around quickly at about the same age.Check out some of the powerplays here. This is the RH player we have with his wicked shot.