Drivesaitl
Finding Hyman
From reading this thread and reddit comments, it seems hockey viewers tend to fall into one of two camps when it comes to play by play preference:
1. High energy excited cadence with effective inflections at mapping the energy of the game into an audio verbalized form.
2. Effectiveness at calling player names and efficiently describing the play on the ice.
Singh was excellent at (2) and awful at (1) which is why I think he is so divisive. Personally I would prefer a Type 1 announcer to a Type 2, and very few announcers are great at both, so I didn't much care for Singh but I like Jack Michaels.
Nice post, and I do stress #2. I get myself into games. i don't need the excitement piped in. I do need proper call of the game, clear voice, good enunciation, less mistakes.
I like the way you broke it down. Its probably the case for most people. I would even wonder another thing. People that like reading books would be #2. People that like audiobooks instead would prefer #1. Interesting how you laid that out. yours is the first post to actually break down the like/dislike.