I could have sworn Ben Hutton signed in Detroit, like I would have bet money on it.
weird.
Just another bottom-six-able-to-play-in-the-top-four-for-a-short-time defenseman Benning has thrown away in the last years. Stecher, Hutton, Corrado, Biega, Fantenberg, Schenn. Toss in Tanev and Hamhuis on that list, except you can call them decent-to-good top pairing d.
The only saving grace is the amount of poor defensemen that Benning has also thrown away - Larsen, Clendenning, Pedan, Bartkowski, Weber, Sbisa (exp. draft), Pouliot, and a bunch of even more marginal players. Unfortunately Benning invariably pays some sort of asset to acquire the above.
Sigh. The asset mismanagement is horrific in Vancouver. Benning, in the last five years has managed to acquire three NHL quality d-men - one by overpaying in free agency (Myers) and then Hughes fell in his lap in the draft to due the ineptitude of the teams he has built. Schmidt was forced on him by the Vegas cap crunch and the fact that nobody else would take Schmidt's full salary and/or give any sort of asset.
What a depressing time I just had looking through Canuck rosters of the last five years.
Back on topic - I wouldn't mind Hutton back on a near league minimum contract. He's a capable bottom pair d-man with flashes to do more. Would rather him than Hamonic. Unfortunately, Benning has 24 million in dead and/or replacement level player tied up in cap.
Damn it.