Offside Challenge

Should there be a limit to the coach's use of the offside challenge?

  • Yes.

  • It's good the way it is.

  • Get rid of it altogether.


Results are only viewable after voting.

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,660
18,479
Las Vegas
should only be allowed if the goal is scored on that initial rush.

if a minute of zone time happens before the goal its not because of the offsides, its because you suck
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldo Montoya

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
The rule should be that if the defensive team gains possession any previous offside is nullified and the goal stands. If a team goes in offside and cycles the puck for 30+ seconds but never loses possession and then scores then they directly benefited from the offside play and the goal should be disallowed but if the defensive team gains possession and is unable to clear, that's on them.

It would also probably make it a lot quicker if the league reviewed it and not the refs. If a play is close to being offside they can review it while play is still going on, while the players celebrate, and while the coach looks at the iPad to decide if he's challenging it or not that way if they do challenge they can give an answer in seconds instead of having the ref go over and start the process after the game has already been delayed while the coach thought about what to do.
 
Last edited:

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
42,997
9,190
I think it adds to the suspense and story line.

The cheering for the other team to clear the puck on your PPs because you’re convinced that your team entered the zone offside and don’t want all your PP time wasted on a goal that won’t even count if scored(you obviously only get the time back if you score). That’s the pinnacle of fun right there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emerz

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad