Archijerej
Registered User
I'm not against going into the season with a stop-gap like Tierney, or someone like that, and let the chips fall where they may. That's fine.Who knows by how much. It might be a little or it might be a lot. Depends on a lot. But odds are the Habs are probably not a playoff team. And trading a 1st now for a guy like Dvorak is not something a team in that situation should do.
I don't think Vatanen or Shattenkirk would make a major difference. Maybe Shattenkirk. But now you're getting to the point that you're basically betting on a relatively old team with a bunch of guys with money term and some good young guys that you might not even be able to pay when their contracts are up. Betting that team is going to do something special, again, because... grit and depth.
And a mid 1st is not nothing. Caufield was a 16th OA pick in 2019. Suzuki was a 13th OA pick in 2017.
We're at the point (whether by the point in time of the retool or just how much money is tied up in guys earning 27+ money) where you have to show faith in your young guys. Give them a role and and consistency and work through the kinks. You can't just yank them around forever. Either your a team that can draft or develop or not. And if not, something has to change.
I just don't think we should overvalue picks and prospects. Even if we play patiently, once we're ready to contend, we're going to need a guy like Dvorak, just like Tampa needed Gourde, Boston needed Coyle and the Islanders needed Pageau. If there's an opportunity to acquire him now, we should seriously consider it.
I'm ok with either scenario, though, as long as the accumulation of prospects and picks isn't an end of itself.
Last edited: