Toggle sidebar

[OFFICIAL] 2017 Magic Number/OOT Game Thread [FLAMES HAVE QUALIFIED]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kahvi

Kahvi

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 4, 2007
4,934
3,587
Alberga
Looks like its either Anaheim or Chicago (Edmonton also a small possibility), and I'd put my money its Anaheim if I had to.
 
Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
WESTERN CONFERENCE - PACIFIC DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | x | Anaheim Ducks | 80 | 44 | 23 | 13 | 41 | 101 | 0.631 | 2 | 105 | 1.5 Win(s) or 3 Point(s)
2 | x | Edmonton Oilers | 79 | 44 | 26 | 9 | 40 | 97 | 0.614 | 3 | 103 |
3 | x | San Jose Sharks | 80 | 45 | 28 | 7 | 43 | 97 | 0.606 | 2 | 101 |
4 | x | Calgary Flames | 80 | 44 | 32 | 4 | 40 | 92 | 0.575 | 2 | 96 |
5 | | Los Angeles Kings | 79 | 38 | 34 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.525 | 3 | 89 |
6 | | Vancouver Canucks | 79 | 30 | 40 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.437 | 3 | 75 |
7 | | Arizona Coyotes | 80 | 29 | 41 | 10 | 23 | 68 | 0.425 | 2 | 72 |

WESTERN CONFERENCE - CENTRAL DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | z | Chicago Blackhawks | 80 | 50 | 22 | 8 | 46 | 108 | 0.675 | 2 | 112 | Clinched 1st in Western Conference
2 | x | Minnesota Wild | 80 | 47 | 25 | 8 | 44 | 102 | 0.638 | 2 | 106 |
3 | x | St. Louis Blues | 79 | 43 | 29 | 7 | 42 | 93 | 0.589 | 3 | 99 |
4 | x | Nashville Predators | 80 | 40 | 28 | 12 | 38 | 92 | 0.575 | 2 | 96 |
5 | | Winnipeg Jets | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 35 | 83 | 0.519 | 2 | 87 |
6 | | Dallas Stars | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.481 | 2 | 81 |
7 | | Colorado Avalanche | 79 | 22 | 54 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.297 | 3 | 53 |

WESTERN CONFERENCE - WILD CARD
TOP 2 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT
1 | x | Calgary Flames | 80 | 44 | 32 | 4 | 40 | 92 | 0.575
2 | x | Nashville Predators | 80 | 40 | 28 | 12 | 38 | 92 | 0.575
3 | | Los Angeles Kings | 79 | 38 | 34 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.525
4 | | Winnipeg Jets | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 35 | 83 | 0.519
5 | | Dallas Stars | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.481
6 | | Vancouver Canucks | 79 | 30 | 40 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.437
7 | | Arizona Coyotes | 80 | 29 | 41 | 10 | 23 | 68 | 0.425
8 | | Colorado Avalanche | 79 | 22 | 54 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.297

WESTERN CONFERENCE - MAGIC NUMBERS

RANK | PLAYOFF RK | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | MAX ROW | MAGIC #* | Tragic #**
1 | C1 | Chicago Blackhawks | 80 | 50 | 22 | 8 | 46 | 108 | 0.675 | 2 | 112 | 48 | CLINCHED |
2 | C2 | Minnesota Wild | 80 | 47 | 25 | 8 | 44 | 102 | 0.638 | 2 | 106 | 46 | CLINCHED |
3 | P1 | Anaheim Ducks | 80 | 44 | 23 | 13 | 41 | 101 | 0.631 | 2 | 105 | 43 | CLINCHED |
4 | P2 | Edmonton Oilers | 79 | 44 | 26 | 9 | 40 | 97 | 0.614 | 3 | 103 | 43 | CLINCHED |
5 | P3 | San Jose Sharks | 80 | 45 | 28 | 7 | 43 | 97 | 0.606 | 2 | 101 | 45 | CLINCHED |
6 | C3 | St. Louis Blues | 79 | 43 | 29 | 7 | 42 | 93 | 0.589 | 3 | 99 | 45 | CLINCHED |
7 | W1 | Calgary Flames | 80 | 44 | 32 | 4 | 40 | 92 | 0.575 | 2 | 96 | 42 | CLINCHED |
8 | W2 | Nashville Predators | 80 | 40 | 28 | 12 | 38 | 92 | 0.575 | 2 | 96 | 40 | CLINCHED |
9 | | Los Angeles Kings | 79 | 38 | 34 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.525 | 3 | 89 | 39 | | ELIMINATED
10 | | Winnipeg Jets | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 35 | 83 | 0.519 | 2 | 87 | 37 | | ELIMINATED
11 | | Dallas Stars | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.481 | 2 | 81 | 35 | | ELIMINATED
12 | | Vancouver Canucks | 79 | 30 | 40 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.437 | 3 | 75 | 29 | | ELIMINATED
13 | | Arizona Coyotes | 80 | 29 | 41 | 10 | 23 | 68 | 0.425 | 2 | 72 | 25 | | ELIMINATED
14 | | Colorado Avalanche | 79 | 22 | 54 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.297 | 3 | 53 | 24 | | ELIMINATED


EASTERN CONFERENCE - ATLANTIC DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | y | Montreal Canadiens | 79 | 46 | 24 | 9 | 43 | 101 | 0.639 | 3 | 107 | Clinched 1st in Atlantic Division
2 | | Ottawa Senators | 79 | 42 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 94 | 0.595 | 3 | 100 |
3 | x | Boston Bruins | 80 | 44 | 30 | 6 | 42 | 94 | 0.588 | 2 | 98 |
4 | | Toronto Maple Leafs | 79 | 39 | 25 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.589 | 3 | 99 |
5 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 79 | 39 | 30 | 10 | 35 | 88 | 0.557 | 3 | 94 |
6 | | Florida Panthers | 79 | 33 | 35 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.487 | 3 | 83 |
7 | | Buffalo Sabres | 79 | 32 | 35 | 12 | 30 | 76 | 0.481 | 3 | 82 |
8 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475 | 2 | 80 |

EASTERN CONFERENCE - METRO DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | x | Washington Capitals | 79 | 53 | 18 | 8 | 51 | 114 | 0.722 | 3 | 120 | 0.5 Win(s) or 1 Point(s)
2 | x | Pittsburgh Penguins | 79 | 49 | 19 | 11 | 45 | 109 | 0.690 | 3 | 115 |
3 | x | Columbus Blue Jackets | 79 | 49 | 22 | 8 | 47 | 106 | 0.671 | 3 | 112 |
4 | x | New York Rangers | 79 | 47 | 26 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.633 | 3 | 106 |
5 | | New York Islanders | 79 | 38 | 29 | 12 | 36 | 88 | 0.557 | 3 | 94 |
6 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531 | 2 | 89 |
7 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 79 | 35 | 30 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.532 | 3 | 90 |
8 | | New Jersey Devils | 79 | 28 | 37 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.443 | 3 | 76 |

EASTERN CONFERENCE - WILD CARD
TOP 2 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT
1 | x | New York Rangers | 79 | 47 | 26 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.633
2 | | Toronto Maple Leafs | 79 | 39 | 25 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.589
3 | | New York Islanders | 79 | 38 | 29 | 12 | 36 | 88 | 0.557
4 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 79 | 39 | 30 | 10 | 35 | 88 | 0.557
5 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531
6 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 79 | 35 | 30 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.532
7 | | Florida Panthers | 79 | 33 | 35 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.487
8 | | Buffalo Sabres | 79 | 32 | 35 | 12 | 30 | 76 | 0.481
9 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475
10 | | New Jersey Devils | 79 | 28 | 37 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.443

EASTERN CONFERENCE - MAGIC NUMBERS

RANK | PLAYOFF RK | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | MAX ROW | MAGIC # | Tragic #**
1 | M1 | Washington Capitals | 79 | 53 | 18 | 8 | 51 | 114 | 0.722 | 3 | 120 | 54 | CLINCHED |
2 | M2 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 79 | 49 | 19 | 11 | 45 | 109 | 0.690 | 3 | 115 | 48 | CLINCHED |
3 | M3 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 79 | 49 | 22 | 8 | 47 | 106 | 0.671 | 3 | 112 | 50 | CLINCHED |
4 | W1 | Montreal Canadiens | 79 | 46 | 24 | 9 | 43 | 101 | 0.639 | 3 | 107 | 46 | CLINCHED |
5 | A1 | New York Rangers | 79 | 47 | 26 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.633 | 3 | 106 | 47 | CLINCHED |
6 | A2 | Ottawa Senators | 79 | 42 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 94 | 0.595 | 3 | 100 | 40 | 0.5 Win(s) / 1 Point(s) |
7 | A3 | Boston Bruins | 80 | 44 | 30 | 6 | 42 | 94 | 0.588 | 2 | 98 | 44 | CLINCHED |
8 | W2 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 79 | 39 | 25 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.589 | 3 | 99 | 41 | 1.0 Win(s) / 2 Point(s) |
9 | | New York Islanders | 79 | 38 | 29 | 12 | 36 | 88 | 0.557 | 3 | 94 | 39 | | 1 loss(es) / 2 points
10 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 79 | 39 | 30 | 10 | 35 | 88 | 0.557 | 3 | 94 | 38 | | 1 loss(es) / 2 points
11 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531 | 2 | 89 | 33 | | Eliminated
12 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 79 | 35 | 30 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.532 | 3 | 90 | 36 | | Eliminated
13 | | Florida Panthers | 79 | 33 | 35 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.487 | 3 | 83 | 31 | | Eliminated
14 | | Buffalo Sabres | 79 | 32 | 35 | 12 | 30 | 76 | 0.481 | 3 | 82 | 33 | | Eliminated
15 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475 | 2 | 80 | 25 | | Eliminated
16 | | New Jersey Devils | 79 | 28 | 37 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.443 | 3 | 76 | 28 | | Eliminated
 
Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
Remaining Schedule for the Western Conference.

Thursday
Date | Matchup | Time / Result
06-Apr | St. Louis@ Florida | 7:30 PM ET
06-Apr | Minnesota @ Colorado | 9:00 PM ET
06-Apr | Chicago @ Anaheim | 10:00 PM ET
06-Apr | Calgary @ Los Angeles | 10:30 PM ET
06-Apr | Edmonton @ San Jose | 10:30 PM ET

Saturday
Date | Matchup | Time / Result
08-Apr | Chicago@ Los Angeles | 6:00 PM ET
08-Apr | St. Louis @ Carolina | 7:00 PM ET
08-Apr | Minnesota @ Arizona | 9:00 PM ET
08-Apr | Edmonton @ Vancouver | 10:00 PM ET
08-Apr | Calgary @ San Jose | 10:00 PM ET

Sunday
Date | Matchup | Time / Result
09-Apr | Colorado @ St. Louis | 6:00 PM ET
09-Apr | Los Angeles @ Anaheim | 8:30 PM ET
09-Apr | Vancouver @ Edmonton | 9:00 PM ET

With the Ducks still having Chicago on Thursday and the Oilers having a game in hand, the Oilers are still in the race for the Pacific title. If we want WC1, we need to win our final 2 games because I suspect Nashville and St. Louis will both win out.
 
DCDM

DCDM

Da Rink Cats
Mar 24, 2008
38,094
6,426
Calgary
Not sure if it has been brought up, but the Flames are officially locked into a WC spot. So it'll either be Hawks or (Ducks | Oilers | Sharks).
 
FlamerForLife

FlamerForLife

Mon Seanahan
May 22, 2015
4,702
1,926
Calgary
Tapu Debe said:
Not sure if it has been brought up, but the Flames are officially locked into a WC spot. So it'll either be Hawks or (Ducks | Oilers | Sharks).
Click to expand...

Sharks would be the best matchup for us Imo but that would require them to winout and Anaheim to lose their remaining games, if it's not San Jose I'd rather face Chicago than Anaheim or edmonton
 
DCDM

DCDM

Da Rink Cats
Mar 24, 2008
38,094
6,426
Calgary
FlamerForLife said:
Sharks would be the best matchup for us Imo but that would require them to winout and Anaheim to lose their remaining games, if it's not San Jose I'd rather face Chicago than Anaheim or edmonton
Click to expand...

Sharks have Edmonton and Calgary left. They could conceivably win out but if we lose vs SJ and Nashville wins both of their remaining games then we get pushed down to where we would play Chicago.

Speaking of Preds, they have Dallas and Winnipeg left. They've been a bit up and down lately from what I can tell but those are both very winnable games for them. Then again, if they win out, they would leave the WC situation and it would be the Blues instead.

Speaking of Blues, they have Panthers, Hurricanes, and Avs left. Realistically they're good enough to go 3-0 but they lost to Winnipeg last night so :laugh: Either way, I think both the Preds and Blues end up in the WC1 spot, although the Preds need to outright get more points than the Flames.

Ducks have Chicago and LA left, I think a reasonable expectation for them would be 1-1 in those games. Then again their defense is in shambles so who really knows. But pretty sure they only need to pick up one more win to clinch the div.

Oilers have SJ and Vancouver left. Again reasonable expectation would be 1-1 in those games, they have to win out and hope for some help from other teams to win the div.

It's also worth nothing that it's impossible for both Edmonton and SJ to win out because there's a H2H left.

So after that massive brain dump, I think what we'll end up with is the following:

C1. Chicago vs WC2. Calgary
C2. Minnesota vs C3. St. Louis
P1. Ducks vs WC1. Nashville
P2. Edmonton/San Jose vs P3. San Jose/Edmonton
 
Mobiandi

Mobiandi

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
20,982
17,386
I don't really want WC1 tbqh. I think playing Chicago gives us a fresh start and we can just focus on playing our game
 
DCDM

DCDM

Da Rink Cats
Mar 24, 2008
38,094
6,426
Calgary
Mobiandi said:
I don't really want WC1 tbqh. I think playing Chicago gives us a fresh start and we can just focus on playing our game
Click to expand...

I agree with you. Even when we were not so hot at the start of the season we actually played the Hawks pretty well. Now of course playoff Chicago is a different beast but still I wouldn't mind using that series as a measuring stick of sorts.
 
Anglesmith

Anglesmith

Setting up the play?
Sep 17, 2012
46,469
14,781
Victoria
Tapu Debe said:
Sharks have Edmonton and Calgary left. They could conceivably win out but if we lose vs SJ and Nashville wins both of their remaining games then we get pushed down to where we would play Chicago.

Speaking of Preds, they have Dallas and Winnipeg left. They've been a bit up and down lately from what I can tell but those are both very winnable games for them. Then again, if they win out, they would leave the WC situation and it would be the Blues instead.

Speaking of Blues, they have Panthers, Hurricanes, and Avs left. Realistically they're good enough to go 3-0 but they lost to Winnipeg last night so :laugh: Either way, I think both the Preds and Blues end up in the WC1 spot, although the Preds need to outright get more points than the Flames.

Ducks have Chicago and LA left, I think a reasonable expectation for them would be 1-1 in those games. Then again their defense is in shambles so who really knows. But pretty sure they only need to pick up one more win to clinch the div.

Oilers have SJ and Vancouver left. Again reasonable expectation would be 1-1 in those games, they have to win out and hope for some help from other teams to win the div.

It's also worth nothing that it's impossible for both Edmonton and SJ to win out because there's a H2H left.

So after that massive brain dump, I think what we'll end up with is the following:

C1. Chicago vs WC2. Calgary
C2. Minnesota vs C3. St. Louis
P1. Ducks vs WC1. Nashville
P2. Edmonton/San Jose vs P3. San Jose/Edmonton
Click to expand...

The Oil actually have Sharks and then Canucks twice. Their game in hand is a big advantage for them. So going 2-1 gives them a shot at the division if Anaheim goes 0-2. Going 3-0 gives them a more realistic shot, especially if none of the wins are in a shootout.
 
Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
IMO the best possible scenario is the Flames and Oilers both win out with Anaheim losing against Chicago tomorrow. The Oilers are the best match-up. After that, I don't think there is a preferable match-up between Chicago and Anaheim.
 
Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
WESTERN CONFERENCE - PACIFIC DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | x | Anaheim Ducks | 81 | 45 | 23 | 13 | 42 | 103 | 0.636 | 1 | 105 | 0.5 Win(s) or 1 Point(s)
2 | x | Edmonton Oilers | 80 | 45 | 26 | 9 | 41 | 99 | 0.619 | 2 | 103 |
3 | x | San Jose Sharks | 81 | 45 | 29 | 7 | 43 | 97 | 0.599 | 1 | 99 |
4 | x | Calgary Flames | 81 | 45 | 32 | 4 | 41 | 94 | 0.580 | 1 | 96 |
5 | | Los Angeles Kings | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.519 | 2 | 87 |
6 | | Arizona Coyotes | 81 | 30 | 41 | 10 | 24 | 70 | 0.432 | 1 | 72 |
7 | | Vancouver Canucks | 80 | 30 | 41 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.431 | 2 | 73 |

WESTERN CONFERENCE - CENTRAL DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | z | Chicago Blackhawks | 81 | 50 | 23 | 8 | 46 | 108 | 0.667 | 1 | 110 | Clinched 1st in Western Conference
2 | x | Minnesota Wild | 81 | 48 | 25 | 8 | 45 | 104 | 0.642 | 1 | 106 |
3 | x | St. Louis Blues | 80 | 44 | 29 | 7 | 43 | 95 | 0.594 | 2 | 99 |
4 | x | Nashville Predators | 81 | 41 | 28 | 12 | 39 | 94 | 0.580 | 1 | 96 |
5 | | Winnipeg Jets | 81 | 39 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 85 | 0.525 | 1 | 87 |
6 | | Dallas Stars | 81 | 33 | 37 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.475 | 1 | 79 |
7 | | Colorado Avalanche | 80 | 22 | 55 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.294 | 2 | 51 |

WESTERN CONFERENCE - WILD CARD
TOP 2 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT
1 | x | Calgary Flames | 81 | 45 | 32 | 4 | 41 | 94 | 0.580
2 | x | Nashville Predators | 81 | 41 | 28 | 12 | 39 | 94 | 0.580
3 | | Winnipeg Jets | 81 | 39 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 85 | 0.525
4 | | Los Angeles Kings | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.519
5 | | Dallas Stars | 81 | 33 | 37 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.475
6 | | Arizona Coyotes | 81 | 30 | 41 | 10 | 24 | 70 | 0.432
7 | | Vancouver Canucks | 80 | 30 | 41 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.431
8 | | Colorado Avalanche | 80 | 22 | 55 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.294

WESTERN CONFERENCE - MAGIC NUMBERS

RANK | PLAYOFF RK | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | MAX ROW | MAGIC #* | Tragic #**
1 | C1 | Chicago Blackhawks | 81 | 50 | 23 | 8 | 46 | 108 | 0.667 | 1 | 110 | 47 | CLINCHED |
2 | C2 | Minnesota Wild | 81 | 48 | 25 | 8 | 45 | 104 | 0.642 | 1 | 106 | 46 | CLINCHED |
3 | P1 | Anaheim Ducks | 81 | 45 | 23 | 13 | 42 | 103 | 0.636 | 1 | 105 | 43 | CLINCHED |
4 | P2 | Edmonton Oilers | 80 | 45 | 26 | 9 | 41 | 99 | 0.619 | 2 | 103 | 43 | CLINCHED |
5 | P3 | San Jose Sharks | 81 | 45 | 29 | 7 | 43 | 97 | 0.599 | 1 | 99 | 44 | CLINCHED |
6 | C3 | St. Louis Blues | 80 | 44 | 29 | 7 | 43 | 95 | 0.594 | 2 | 99 | 45 | CLINCHED |
7 | W1 | Calgary Flames | 81 | 45 | 32 | 4 | 41 | 94 | 0.580 | 1 | 96 | 42 | CLINCHED |
8 | W2 | Nashville Predators | 81 | 41 | 28 | 12 | 39 | 94 | 0.580 | 1 | 96 | 40 | CLINCHED |
9 | | Winnipeg Jets | 81 | 39 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 85 | 0.525 | 1 | 87 | 37 | | ELIMINATED
10 | | Los Angeles Kings | 80 | 38 | 35 | 7 | 36 | 83 | 0.519 | 2 | 87 | 38 | | ELIMINATED
11 | | Dallas Stars | 81 | 33 | 37 | 11 | 33 | 77 | 0.475 | 1 | 79 | 34 | | ELIMINATED
12 | | Arizona Coyotes | 81 | 30 | 41 | 10 | 24 | 70 | 0.432 | 1 | 72 | 25 | | ELIMINATED
13 | | Vancouver Canucks | 80 | 30 | 41 | 9 | 26 | 69 | 0.431 | 2 | 73 | 28 | | ELIMINATED
14 | | Colorado Avalanche | 80 | 22 | 55 | 3 | 21 | 47 | 0.294 | 2 | 51 | 23 | | ELIMINATED


EASTERN CONFERENCE - ATLANTIC DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | y | Montreal Canadiens | 80 | 46 | 25 | 9 | 43 | 101 | 0.631 | 2 | 105 | Clinched 1st in Atlantic Division
2 | x | Ottawa Senators | 80 | 43 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 96 | 0.600 | 2 | 100 |
3 | x | Boston Bruins | 81 | 44 | 30 | 7 | 42 | 95 | 0.586 | 1 | 97 |
4 | | Toronto Maple Leafs | 80 | 39 | 26 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.581 | 2 | 97 |
5 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 80 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 36 | 90 | 0.563 | 2 | 94 |
6 | | Buffalo Sabres | 80 | 33 | 35 | 12 | 31 | 78 | 0.488 | 2 | 82 |
7 | | Florida Panters | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.481 | 2 | 81 |
8 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475 | 2 | 80 |

EASTERN CONFERENCE - METRO DIVISION
TOP 3 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | Div Magic #
1 | x | Washington Capitals | 80 | 54 | 18 | 8 | 52 | 116 | 0.725 | 2 | 120 | Clinched Presidents Trophy
2 | x | Pittsburgh Penguins | 80 | 50 | 19 | 11 | 46 | 111 | 0.694 | 2 | 115 |
3 | x | Columbus Blue Jackets | 80 | 49 | 23 | 8 | 47 | 106 | 0.663 | 2 | 110 |
4 | x | New York Rangers | 80 | 47 | 27 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.625 | 2 | 104 |
5 | | New York Islanders | 80 | 39 | 29 | 12 | 37 | 90 | 0.563 | 2 | 94 |
6 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531 | 2 | 89 |
7 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 80 | 35 | 31 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.525 | 2 | 88 |
8 | | New Jersey Devils | 80 | 28 | 38 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.438 | 2 | 74 |

EASTERN CONFERENCE - WILD CARD
TOP 2 TEAMS QUALIFY

RANK | | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT
1 | x | New York Rangers | 80 | 47 | 27 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.625
2 | | Toronto Maple Leafs | 80 | 39 | 26 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.581
3 | | New York Islanders | 80 | 39 | 29 | 12 | 37 | 90 | 0.563
4 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 80 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 36 | 90 | 0.563
5 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531
6 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 80 | 35 | 31 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.525
7 | | Buffalo Sabres | 80 | 33 | 35 | 12 | 31 | 78 | 0.488
8 | | Florida Panthers | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.481
9 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475
10 | | New Jersey Devils | 80 | 28 | 38 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.438

EASTERN CONFERENCE - MAGIC NUMBERS

RANK | PLAYOFF RK | --- --- TEAM NAME --- --- | GP | W | L | OT | ROW | POINTS | PT PCT | GR | MAX PTS | MAX ROW | MAGIC # | Tragic #**
1 | M1 | Washington Capitals | 80 | 54 | 18 | 8 | 52 | 116 | 0.725 | 2 | 120 | 54 | CLINCHED |
2 | M2 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 80 | 50 | 19 | 11 | 46 | 111 | 0.694 | 2 | 115 | 48 | CLINCHED |
3 | M3 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 80 | 49 | 23 | 8 | 47 | 106 | 0.663 | 2 | 110 | 49 | CLINCHED |
4 | W1 | Montreal Canadiens | 80 | 46 | 25 | 9 | 43 | 101 | 0.631 | 2 | 105 | 45 | CLINCHED |
5 | A1 | New York Rangers | 80 | 47 | 27 | 6 | 44 | 100 | 0.625 | 2 | 104 | 46 | CLINCHED |
6 | A2 | Ottawa Senators | 80 | 43 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 96 | 0.600 | 2 | 100 | 39 | CLINCHED |
7 | A3 | Boston Bruins | 81 | 44 | 30 | 7 | 42 | 95 | 0.586 | 1 | 97 | 43 | CLINCHED |
8 | W2 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 80 | 39 | 26 | 15 | 38 | 93 | 0.581 | 2 | 97 | 40 | 1.0 Win(s) / 2 Point(s) |
9 | | New York Islanders | 80 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 36 | 90 | 0.563 | 2 | 94 | 38 | | 1 loss(es) / 2 points
10 | | Tampa Bay Lightning | 80 | 39 | 29 | 12 | 37 | 90 | 0.563 | 2 | 94 | 39 | | 1 loss(es) / 2 points
11 | | Philadelphia Flyers | 80 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 31 | 85 | 0.531 | 2 | 89 | 33 | | Eliminated
12 | | Carolina Hurricanes | 80 | 35 | 31 | 14 | 33 | 84 | 0.525 | 2 | 88 | 35 | | Eliminated
13 | | Buffalo Sabres | 80 | 33 | 35 | 12 | 31 | 78 | 0.488 | 2 | 82 | 33 | | Eliminated
14 | | Florida Panthers | 80 | 33 | 36 | 11 | 28 | 77 | 0.481 | 2 | 81 | 30 | | Eliminated
15 | | Detroit Red Wings | 80 | 32 | 36 | 12 | 23 | 76 | 0.475 | 2 | 80 | 25 | | Eliminated
16 | | New Jersey Devils | 80 | 28 | 38 | 14 | 25 | 70 | 0.438 | 2 | 74 | 27 | | Eliminated
 
1989

1989

Registered User
Aug 3, 2010
10,387
3,914
Do any scenarios still exist where Calgary plays San Jose in the first round?
 
Lunatik

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,246
8,380
Signature said:
Do any scenarios still exist where Calgary plays San Jose in the first round?
Click to expand...
Nope, not in round 1. We are locked into a WC spot and they best they can get is 2nd in the pacific and even that will take them beating us and then Edmonton losing back to back games against Vancouver. So San Jose is all but officially locked into that 3rd seed because I cannot seed the Oilers not getting a single point against the Canucks.

We are guaranteed to have Anaheim, Edmonton of Chicago in round 1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom