Given there are probably a half million Eklund-wannabes out on Twitter.
I might have to warm this up again.....
If we hire Doan in any capacity do we not think he will first try to see if he can get this relationship to work before going full into a deal?
Maybe that’s the compromise though. Removing the C to make Tocchet happy and reset expectations.Oliver isn't a natural leader. His game dropped when he put on the C. There's no point.
The tweet didn’t come from an account that is verified but the quote about Oliver Ekman-Larsson came directly from Elliotte Friedman. I can try to find the link again
Oliver isn't a natural leader. His game dropped when he put on the C. There's no point.
I already knew about Friedman.
But you know how statements get twisted and re-contexted.
Everyone looks for an angle. The alleged rift between OEL and Tocchet goes all the way back to last year. Yet OEL was still given the C this year.
If we hire Doan in any capacity do we not think he will first try to see if he can get this relationship to work before going full into a deal?[/QUOTE
I hire a new GM and coach. Let them talk to OEL and go from there. All the better if Doan is hired in some capacity. Doan is very well respected in the hockey world regardless of what people think around here.
I think most teams would love to have him but yeah teams with big offense but questionable D (e.g. Edmonton, Toronto, etc.) will be extra excited to land him.I believe this 100%. He's not a leader. You can see that in his demeanor and attitude on the ice and when he's being interviewed. I think he'll go back to being a top pairing guy when he's on another team and no longer the captain. Sucks for us because we won't get full value for his talent but nothing more to be done at this point. I don't think he'd deal well with the questions that come with taking the C off his chest. He'd probably get worse. Maybe we can get Tippett into a bidding war with another team to drive up his value. I'd be he'd love to have OEL on that team.
OEL's play dropped with RT, like most other players. OEL is on the same or near same level as Hall. You just don't trade away these type of players unless you are rebuilding and we are not.Oliver isn't a natural leader. His game dropped when he put on the C. There's no point.
Only recent case I can think where it went ok is Joe Thornton. So yeah, I'm not sure OEL will respond well even though I think in his heart of hearts he doesn't really want to be captain.Taking away the C is a major step once you've already given it to a player. It usually ends the relationship with that player on that team, in most cases.
OEL's play dropped with RT, like most other players. OEL is on the same or near same level as Hall. You just don't trade away these type of players unless you are rebuilding and we are not.
You seem very confident of that in light of present circumstances...unless you are rebuilding and we are not.
OEL's play dropped with RT, like most other players. OEL is on the same or near same level as Hall. You just don't trade away these type of players unless you are rebuilding and we are not.
You just don't trade away these type of players unless you are rebuilding and we are not.
Only recent case I can think where it went ok is Joe Thornton. So yeah, I'm not sure OEL will respond well even though I think in his heart of hearts he doesn't really want to be captain.
I think most teams would love to have him but yeah teams with big offense but questionable D (e.g. Edmonton, Toronto, etc.) will be extra excited to land him.