e-e
Registered User
i grabbed the hockey news (feb 14) between games today. there is an article form mike brophy at page 22. At the end of the piece there are odds for big 7 at olympics.
here
according to him:
finland: no miikka kiprusoff, NO CHANCE!
slovakia: unless peter budaj, karol krizan, or jan lasak goes to bed one night and wakes up the next day as patrick roy, they CANNOT be taken seriously as medal hopefuls.
does enybody else (besides me) think that unless "senior writer" mike brophy goes to bed one night and wakes up the next day as bob mckenzie he knows **** about objective journalism and respect?
anybody good at math here? : what are the odds to see finland and slovakia in final base on his odds?
btw: what do you think about media and torin 2006?
here
according to him:
finland: no miikka kiprusoff, NO CHANCE!
slovakia: unless peter budaj, karol krizan, or jan lasak goes to bed one night and wakes up the next day as patrick roy, they CANNOT be taken seriously as medal hopefuls.
does enybody else (besides me) think that unless "senior writer" mike brophy goes to bed one night and wakes up the next day as bob mckenzie he knows **** about objective journalism and respect?
anybody good at math here? : what are the odds to see finland and slovakia in final base on his odds?
btw: what do you think about media and torin 2006?