Interesting format, Coleman on the attack. Not so sure he's got the right end of the stick on this one though. For starters, it was Toronto & Montreal (though to a lesser degree than the Leafs) that didnt want a 3rd Canadian team in 1967, not the "4 American clubs" as stated in this article. There was only 6 spots available and despite there being no ownership group in place & bidding, St.Louis awarded a franchise regardless as Norris wanted to unload the ancient & decrepit St.Louis Arena & packaging it with a franchise about the only way he was going to get that done. Of the other 5 teams, just based on footprint alone, San Francisco & LA, Minnesota, Pittsburgh & Philadelphia all made perfect sense really, so I guess you could point the finger at Norris & St.Louis as a block to Vancouver but there was far more to it than just that.
Then theres the Carl Brewer issue; what "American team stood in the way of a Canadian playing for his countries national team"? The Toronto Maple Leafs & specifically Punch Imlach was the one standing in Carl Brewers way. And the reasons for that are well documented. An acrimonious split, Brewer an oddball & outlier from the get-go, couldnt stand Imlach, a number of his team mates, hated the Trap System, didnt like playing by "The Code", got beaten up and was never really the same player thereafter. Quits after getting into an argument with Johnny Bower. Like picking a fight with a department store Santa Claus. Who does that?... and dont get me wrong, love Brewer, his monumental fight with the league, brilliant guy but still... prickly pear as was Imlach. Oil & water.
This style of writing, its premise, early 20th century provincialism & American xenophobia, out waving the then new Canadian Flag & Expo 67, that Smythe & Molson "owed it" to Canadians & the game of hockey to open their buildings & wallets to the National Team program (which I do agree with in part but over-all, not so much), well, thank God that kind of thinking is dying, an anachronism of the past. So we have some serious factual errors upon which a lecture is delivered in sonorous Edwardian tones all designed to raise the blood pressure of every God fearing hockey loving mothers son from Halifax to Victoria.... most excellent. Well done Jimmy. Certainly an interesting read, snapshot of the past, and yes, some "interesting ideas".