NYR LW: Patrick, Henry, Graves, Vickers, or Prentice

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
25,001
14,392
Vancouver
I know a lot of people have done them before, but I'm trying to make "All-Time Teams" for every franchise, and then put them in a simulator to see how they do. I'm picking the teams based only on what they did for the franchise, ignoring the rest of their career (factoring in mainly how good they were, but also considering how important they were in terms of perhaps helping change the fortunes of the franchise, how much they contributed to a winner, any intangibles they brought, tenure, chemistry with consistent line-mates, etc.) I'm a bit stuck on the Rangers.

Here's my forward line-up so far:

Bun Cook - Frank Boucher - Bill Cook
Vic Hadfield - Jean Ratelle - Rod Gilbert
_________ - Mark Messier - Andy Bathgate
_________ - Neil Colville- Bryan Hextall


I think it's a pretty solid group, and the only questionable selections are probably Hadfield and Colville. Hadfield is probably pretty close to the group in the thread title, but I wanted to keep the GAG line intact. Colville could probably be replaced by a few guys, such as Tkaczuk, Watson, Esposito, Laprade, or even Patrick or Henry, who played both centre and wing. I like Tkaczuk's tenure with the team and defensive game. But he was also just a very good second line centre, while Colville was a HoFer, a first line centre and tied for the leading scorer on a cup win.


So, I need to fill out the other two LW spots, and I think it basically comes down to Lynn Patrick, Camille Henry, Adam Graves, Steve Vickers or Dean Prentice.

Patrick is in the HoF and seems like the most likely choice for one spot. But he wasn't a main scorer outside of his three big years during the war. His first two, however, came before many of his teammates left. Was he a late bloomer, or a product of the watered down league?

Henry was a slick player and very good goal-scorer who was actually top-7 in goals 6 times. Yet his overall game seems lacking and his teams were never very good.

Graves and Vickers are similar hard working fan favourite types each with one big season that led to a 2nd team all-star nod, but were not in the same league as the other guys as scorers.

Prentice had some big seasons, but he was on the same teams as Henry, with the same lack of success, and I'm not sure if he was actually better.


So what do you guys think? I think Patrick probably gets a spot (on the 4th line, playing with teammates Hextall and Colville), but not sure about the other. The other thing I've though of is adding Cecil Dillon, and moving him to LW



Also, any other comments on the team would be appreciated.

Here's the rest of the team:

Brian Leetch - Brad Park
Bill Gadsby - Harry Howell
Ching Johnson - Ott Heller

Ed Giacomin
Mike Richter
Chuck Rayner

Heller is somewhat questionable, but he played 15 year, won two cups, was a 2nd team all-star and teamed with Johnson.

Kerr and Worsley were probably better goaltenders than Richter, and perhaps he gets too much credit with the cup win (which Kerr also has), but he feels more like an all-time Ranger.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,982
Brooklyn
Does the sim take defense into account? If not, Patrick is definitely the best choice.

I would probably take Patrick and Graves for the last two spots. Prentice was very good defensively - basically the defensive conscience for Bathgate - but his offense wasn't anything special.

Henri was basically a PP specialist (and an excellent one). Don't know much about Vickers.

By the way, whatever line has Messier-Bathgate on it will be better than the GAG line, and not by a small margin.
 

jkrx

Registered User
Feb 4, 2010
4,337
21
Graves for sure... I just loved that player for some reason.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
25,001
14,392
Vancouver
Does the sim take defense into account? If not, Patrick is definitely the best choice.

I would probably take Patrick and Graves for the last two spots. Prentice was very good defensively - basically the defensive conscience for Bathgate - but his offense wasn't anything special.

Henri was basically a PP specialist (and an excellent one). Don't know much about Vickers.

By the way, whatever line has Messier-Bathgate on it will be better than the GAG line, and not by a small margin.

The sim does take defense into account, though I'm not sure how much forward defense affects it (I know defenseman defense is fairly large). I think even with it Patrick is probably a choice.

I had a feeling perhaps Henry was a PP specialist, as for the last few seasons I have the numbers for, he scored a high number of PP goals. It's not a bad thing to be, but I think it's not enough to make the team.

I had heard a few things about Prentice's defense, but I wasn't sure if he was solid or very good. Like Graves and Vickers he had the one big scoring season as well when he was 4th in goals (and another 8th). I think all three of them are fairly close, but like you I think I'd probably go with Graves just because of how well he's thought of by fans, and his contribution to a cup.

You're right about Messier and Bathgate. I put them there mainly because the GAG line is so well known, and they were Rangers for a bit longer. The sim essentially splits the playing time of the lines fairly evenly though.
 

pappyline

Registered User
Jul 3, 2005
4,587
182
Mass/formerly Ont
The sim does take defense into account, though I'm not sure how much forward defense affects it (I know defenseman defense is fairly large). I think even with it Patrick is probably a choice.

I had a feeling perhaps Henry was a PP specialist, as for the last few seasons I have the numbers for, he scored a high number of PP goals. It's not a bad thing to be, but I think it's not enough to make the team.

I had heard a few things about Prentice's defense, but I wasn't sure if he was solid or very good. Like Graves and Vickers he had the one big scoring season as well when he was 4th in goals (and another 8th). I think all three of them are fairly close, but like you I think I'd probably go with Graves just because of how well he's thought of by fans, and his contribution to a cup.

You're right about Messier and Bathgate. I put them there mainly because the GAG line is so well known, and they were Rangers for a bit longer. The sim essentially splits the playing time of the lines fairly evenly though.
Prentice was a much better player than Graves. Graves is way over-rated by rangers fans because he played recently & he was a role player on a team that happened to win a a cup.
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,190
7,331
Regina, SK
Definitely, without a doubt Dean Prentice. Prentice brought everything you would want in a complementary left winger. Top-15 in goals and assists six times each.

I'd probably lean towards Lynn Patrick next, considering he led the NHL in goals and made multiple all-star teams. Vickers was like a slightly less-skilled Ryan Smyth who had one elite season. Graves was very good but not as dominant or historically significant as Patrick or Prentice.

As for Henry... great PP goalscorer. If you want a PP specialist on the squad he's your man.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,982
Brooklyn
Out of curiosity, how does the sim use "defense?" Is it like the NHL video games where each player gets a rating?

If you want an "all round" player, Prentice is probably the best choice for the Bathgate line.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
25,001
14,392
Vancouver
Out of curiosity, how does the sim use "defense?" Is it like the NHL video games where each player gets a rating?

If you want an "all round" player, Prentice is probably the best choice for the Bathgate line.

I'm not entirely sure how it does it, but it does have a defensive rating for each player (though, I have a beef with some). As well, the sim decides the best PKers on each team, and the rating has an affect there. (And Prentice would most likely be on there).


I'm a big Prentice fan. You've got to go with Prentice.

http://hfboards.com/showpost.php?p=24639641&postcount=116

Thanks for the info. I think he's definitely the choice for the Bathgate line. I knew he had some decent goal and assist finishes, in the teens, and was a better offensive player than Graves and Vickers, but I didn't realize he was such a great forechecker and defensive player as well.

I suppose I saw Graves as more of a "Ranger", but he definitely gets overrated by Rangers fans because of that cup win (as does Richter), and it was pretty ridiculous they retired his number and then thought, oh crap, Bathgate was the much better player, we better retire his too.


Any thoughts on the rest of the team? In particular the choice of Colville (over Tkaczuk, Esposito, Laprade, Watson, etc), Heller (over Coulter, Beck, Greschner, Seiling, Nielson, Patrick, etc) and Richter and Rayner (over Worsley and Kerr)
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,190
7,331
Regina, SK
As for Colville - It would be nice to see who you'd have on the blueline. because Colville won a hart as a defenseman, and you might want to put him there. If you do, you don't have to agonize over whether to put Camille Henry or Lynn Patrick on the 4th line - you can have both, because both can play center.
 

pappyline

Registered User
Jul 3, 2005
4,587
182
Mass/formerly Ont
As for Colville - It would be nice to see who you'd have on the blueline. because Colville won a hart as a defenseman, and you might want to put him there. If you do, you don't have to agonize over whether to put Camille Henry or Lynn Patrick on the 4th line - you can have both, because both can play center.
Colville never won a Hart but does belong on the team as a centre. Was an AS at both centre & defense. The listed defense looks pretty good so leave Colville at centre.

As for Goal drop over-rated Richter & add Worsely.
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,190
7,331
Regina, SK
Colville never won a Hart but does belong on the team as a centre. Was an AS at both centre & defense. The listed defense looks pretty good so leave Colville at centre.

As for Goal drop over-rated Richter & add Worsely.

strange, why did I think Colville won a Hart? :laugh: (no, I didn't have him confused with Goodfellow)

Yeah, that defense looks good, Colville wouldn't fit on it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad