Value of: Nyquist, Toffoli, Zucc, or Silfverberg to EDM

TS Quint

I can see!
Sep 8, 2012
7,792
5,064
They can protect the 1st for one year otherwise the other team might never see it. I’d take the chance that the Oilers finish bottom 10 for the next 2 year.
 

deaderhead28

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
5,356
3,873
I don't know, i'm rubbish with player values.

Something like

Lucic, Puljujarvii, 1st top 5 protected (18) 2nd(19) for Tofolli



Which works out as

1st for TT

PP+ 2nd to lose Looch

Kings fans wont like it though


Ahh No.Not enough from the Oilers to take that awful Lucic contract.Plus you to trade Toffoli to a rival?Kings cap is a mess and we need to get faster,not slower while adding another long term idiotic cap hit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KingCanadain1976

Mister Ed

Registered User
Dec 21, 2008
5,254
968
The Oilers do have enough space to take on Nyquist's contract if everyone stays on IR or LTIR but it's when the players are healthy that it becomes a problem.
I don't see how a deal could be made, other than including RNH and DET upping the trade offering.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,018
7,376
Calgary, AB
Puljujarvi + for Toffoli would interest me. However I don't see how the teams can make the cap work. Edmonton cannot take on the extra and LA cannot afford to take players with term back.
 

drw02

Registered User
Aug 10, 2013
5,736
973
Nyquist is somewhat underrated and would be a solid addition for a playoff contender but think a 1st is a little steep. Would be thrilled to get it but a 2nd+ is more realistic and reasonable imo.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
14,962
9,690
2 2nds for Zucc as the main pieces work for me. We can figure out the rest from there. We're not getting an unprotected 1st, but I'd settle for 1 mid first, or 2 2nds.
 

KasperTheGrittyGhost

Registered User
Jan 12, 2008
1,401
255
Michigan
Why would a team give up a 1st and a 3rd for a guy who is quitting?

9f48TQ
 

405Exit

Registered User
Mar 15, 2018
2,442
424
Unprotected. No interest otherwise

I don’t even think I would do it for a unprotected first. Losing Silf means we basically are tanking. We have no one to replace him pts wise. He’s over a ppg so far into the season as well

First + is what I would want.
 

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
22,980
15,338
Worst Case, Ontario
I don’t even think I would do it for a unprotected first. Losing Silf means we basically are tanking. We have no one to replace him pts wise. He’s over a ppg so far into the season as well

First + is what I would want.

I agree that we hold on to Silfverberg for as long as the playoffs look like a possibility.

But if the season goes south, I could see moving him as a rental. There would no doubt be interest from playoff bound teams given his track record, likely enough to get someone to part with a 1st +
 

razor ray

Registered User
May 8, 2011
1,510
1,586
I doubt it’s a 1st for Nyquist. Maybe a 2nd and a 3rd if some money is retained.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->