Advanced stats in such a dynamic sport are effective for reading between the lines. They have a spot beside "the eye" test (aka, knowing what you're watching and talking about) at best. I won't get into example because there are clearly too many but this BSB article is another. I had Mac between 4-4.5m and still think that's a good number for what he brings to the team, a way (one of the only) out of the zone and some complimentary offence. Our crap defense needs this player going forward. The idea that people here buy solely into advanced stats to pass judgement on a new player playing on a new team in a new system isn't just funny, it's downright ****in hilarious, especially when most of these people are also watching the games in full. It really shows how little a lot of the big talkers actually know about the sport and what it takes to be involved in the play of it.