They really should have a "best offensive defensemen" trophy and a "best defensive defensemen" trophy. To say that Kronwall should be in the running for a trophy that by defintion means "defense player who demonstrates throughout the season the greatest all-round ability in the position" is a joke. This trophy should go to the best two-way defensemen. I'll vote for guys like Kronwall, Karlsson, Green for a best offensive defensemen trophy all day. For an all-around ability trophy? Get real.
In my books guys like Pieterangleo or Shea Weber should win just about every year. Regardless of if they are putting up a ton of points, or top 5 in the league in points.
problem with an offensive d-man trophy is that it would be hard to determine the winner.
i think most fans would expect that the highest scoring d-man to win, like an art ross for d-men, but it is more impressive, imo, to score 50p for a terrible offensive team than 65p for a great offensive team. d-men generally get their points b/c of the play of F's.
for example, in '88 ray bourque led boston in scoring with 81p. next was ken linseman at 74p and then steve kasper at 70p. boston's PP was 3rd worst (16.59%). bourque had 34p on PP.
gary suter was the highest scoring d-man with 91p. calgary's leading scorers were loob (106p), mike bullard (103p) and nieuwendyk (92p). calgary had a dominant PP in that period and it was the best in '88 (28.46%). suter had 43p on PP.
i would vote for bourque over suter in that situation.