At least you're only going to go from 1 to 4 once.
- Avs fan
At least you have a Nathan Mackinnon.
At least you're only going to go from 1 to 4 once.
- Avs fan
At least you have a Nathan Mackinnon.
That's true
And hey falling from 1 to 4 got us Cale Makar and Bowen Byram, so it's not the worst thing in the world. But the draft lottery will piss you off to no end.
Wow so the pens have a shot at winning the lottery if they lose to the habs? That certainly makes this bs play-in more palatable.
I would assume that if Pittsburgh were to lose to Montreal and NOT win the lottery, they would end up with the 15th pick due to their regular season record. Still, it is a nice consolation prize to have a chance at the top 3 picks.
Yeah, you and Vancouver did well with the falling. Detroit is yet to be seen with Seider, Rasmussen, and Zadina but it's still super frustrating that the worst team in the league's history is likely going to pick 4th overall in this draft.
It will be after the qualifying round at least.That's good news IMO.
It means that the draft will be after the season concludes and will mostly be business as usual at that point. The only difference is that teams that are currently "playoff" teams, like Pittsburgh, could end up in the lottery due to the play-in round.
I’d put money on it
Am I crazy or don't the Wild have the Pens 1st rounder this year in the Zucker trade? Or was there a condition? Did a quick Google and could not find one.
I vote for the "bunch of jerks" Hurricanes to lose in the final and organize a ritual boo at centre ice when Bettman starts to speak.Forget the lack of fans.
The lack of booing when Bettman hands the cup to the winning team this summer will be the weirdest experience. Maybe the players can take over and boo him instead?
Shayna Goldman. She writes a lot of analytics-based articles for the Athletic.
Ahhh ok gotcha! Thanks!According to Cap Friendly, the condition is if the Penguins miss the playoffs, they have the option of giving up the 2021 1st round pick instead.
This is probably something that the league will have to figure out. Does losing in the play-in round constitute missing the playoffs? I would assume yes.
I will absolutely not be happy if Edmonton/Pittsburgh get ANOTHER franchise player at 1st overall despite actually being good teams this time
If I were a Buffalo/NJ fan I’d be fuming right now.
Thanks -
While it definitely is not still clear, this leads me to believe the play ins are not considered playoffs. But maybe they will be considered regular season games.
Important distinction for a few reasons. 1 - players only earn their full pay cheque for regular season games 2 - points totals, player bonuses 3 - conditional trades, ex. Player must play X amount of games to receive this pick
If play in teams get a lottery chance...
Thats fine, then no play-in games and seed playoffs by point %The play-in teams had a lottery chance prior to the stoppage. Makes sense that they have one coming out of it too.
Thats fine, then no play-in games and seed playoffs by point %
Or I get it, you get to bend the rules to make it work in your favor but not me right?
Im praying Pittsburgh loses play-in and wins the 1st overall so everyone can feel my pain as a team not included in any of these fancy handouts
So were going to pretend a team 5-points out had as much a chance as making it as a 5-game series?What is the logic behind that first suggestion, though? You appear to be alluding to a contradiction or double standard that doesn't exist.
The play-in games, though obviously not a perfect substitution, are meant to represent the stretch run during which teams may have fallen out of or jumped into the playoff picture. This lottery system is consistent with that.
It doesn't represent shit. They're going to contract the last 20 or so games into a short 5 game series? That's hardly representative of the stretch run at all. Before you ask if I have any other suggestions, I don't, because this is unprecedented. But honestly, they'd have been better off finishing the season than spending months trying to find a substitute. You're wasting just as much time for a result that is never going to be accepted as legitimate.What is the logic behind that first suggestion, though? You appear to be alluding to a contradiction or double standard that doesn't exist.
The play-in games, though obviously not a perfect substitute, are meant to represent the stretch run during which teams may have fallen out of or jumped into the playoff picture. This lottery system is consistent with that.
Why? UFC has come back, the first PGA golf tournament was 2 weeks ago.I highly doubt this means hockey is 100% back. It seems like a presser to touch base with the fans, format detail plan, draft lottery etc. IF they return. Still lots of hurdles to overcome to give the go ahead to play.
When/if Bettman announces an actual return to play date (Phase 3) then we can get excited but this still has a chance of not happening IMO.
You see what you want to see. It's clear you hate the Pens. So you create this hypothetical scenario, that in your head, means the Pens were given a "fancy handout"Thats fine, then no play-in games and seed playoffs by point %
Or I get it, you get to bend the rules to make it work in your favor but not me right?
Im praying Pittsburgh loses play-in and wins the 1st overall so everyone can feel my pain as a team not included in any of these fancy handouts